So? Must every fairy tale trope be checked off?The difference here is that Rey is not purposely removing herself from relationships like Obi-Wan or Luke. She's the other side of the traditional fairy tale coin in being a heroine who also can find romance.
Yes, Lucas did intend for shades of gray, with a good guy becoming bad and the bad guy actually having a point.Its pointless as it comes off as a line inserted into the crawl of ROTS, yet is never seen in the actual film--not to any degree. Where are the "heroes" on the side represented by Sidious, Dooku, Greivous, or the Trade Federation? It did not exist, because Lucas did not intend for there to be shadings of gray (which would be the opposite of his reason for drawing clear ideas of good and evil in creating Star Wars in the post anti-hero / disillusioned films released in the ten years before Star Wars hit screens).
Fair enough. I misread it.I did not discount TMP. I noted it was produced in the 20th century, with the rest of the PT in the 21st, as a matter of chronological accuracy. That does not alter what I posted days ago:
The PT, especially TPM and AOTC, diverts far more than you give it credit for, but we are no so far removed from its novelty to not appreciate it.The PT is not some radical course change from how Lucas followed the traditional myth motifs, for the logical reason that in-universe, the PT had to naturally lead into the OT, with its very clear myth traditions from start to finish. The sequel trilogy is the one which clearly goes off track. Like the days of the Expanded Universe, if there are characters and/or stories that need to go in its own direction, then its best to create its own series independent of the Skywalker story.
She did value it above all else until Anakin came along. It didn't feel natural. It felt forced."Throwing away" career and other duties for love is not only one of the longest lived plot devices in literature/cultural myths, but its real world counterpart predates that. You seem to be suggesting that her life was her career/duties--as if that is what she should value above all else. A life without love (the most natural of human desires) is not living at all, particularly if one consciously shunts it aside all for a career, or the alleged value of duties.
And yet, it doesn't feel like it in the text.Tragic romance in fairy tales have players who make their own decisions; in SW, the will of the Force directs certain events, but all characters have free will to do--or not do--the things that point their lives in a certain direction. Padme being a player in a tragic romance does not remove her responsibility in all that happens, despite the Force being pushed out of balance, and attempting to correct that through the Skywalker children. Knowing Padme made her own decisions gives her plight some weight, as she was fighting to right all that went wrong until her last breath.
That argument proceeds from false assumption and concludes in error.As I've observed not only on TrekBBS, but elsewhere, some create a universe of excuses why Finn and Rey should not be together...excuses that do not hold up to questioning, which usually leaves one time-honored sickness as the true reason for the never-ending resistance to the idea.
And that's a load of garbage. People ship all characters, from Frodo/Thorin, to Princess Peach and Master Chief. It's not "buried." It's barely registered and we haven't seen the conclusion of the film! Yet, the assumptions abound...absurd.Yes--a homicidal dictator or a guy she barely knows...instead of the one character that naturally bonded with her not only as a friend, but--if you look at her expression as Finn is pulling the sheet on Rose / her message to Chewbacca which (despite no on-screen translation) would not be retreading a message of a friendship both she and Finn already know exists. Nope--that's all buried with one Poe scene and fantasies that Rey will "save" Ren in time for the two to become an item.
Oh, jeez, already. Forget the friggin' romance. Can't a woman be a major character without having to hook up with a man?
So? Must every fairy tale trope be checked off?
This.It's pretty clear that Rey thought she was following in Luke's footsteps, that she sensed some good in Kylo and just as with Luke did with Vader (who was *waaaay* more far gone and evil than Kylo), she thought she could bring him back over to the light. She was wrong. Her intentions were good, but she let her need for kinship and guidance cloud her judgement.
This.
And Luke tried to save the guy who cut off his hand and enslaved most of the galaxy.She never stopped to wonder if Kylo Ren was setting a trap or anything similar . . . considering that he had attempted to violate her mind just a FEW DAYS EARLIER in order to discover Luke's whereabouts? Rey must have been incredibly stupid.
Larger ships-larger signatures. Poe had to run interference for the Resistance not to detect it.If Finn and Rose were able to slip away from Leia's command ship undetected by the Resistance or the First Order on a transport ship, why couldn't the surviving members of the Resistance have done the same in small groups . . . EARLIER IN THE FILM?
Rey and Finn? Wasn't Rose introduced/inserted to give Finn a love interest? As clumsy as that was executed.I don't understand why Rey & Finn have to be a romance? Is it really so inconceivable for a young man and woman to just be friends?
Same here. This is all wrapped up in racist, mythological trope, Star Wars has always done this, nonsense.I don't understand why Rey & Finn have to be a romance? Is it really so inconceivable for a young man and woman to just be friends?
Why most Rey be in a romance? Why must any of them?
I don't understand why Rey & Finn have to be a romance? Is it really so inconceivable for a young man and woman to just be friends?
Isn't that why Anakin and Padme had to hide their romance? And then what happened bore out exactly WHY Jedi should never do that.. Their feelings and emotions outweigh the force. Anakin's love for Padme was the straw that broke the bantha's back and ushered in his transition to the Dark Side.
You are assuming from error.I can see why you feel that way, considering that the only three potential mates for Rey is a guy played by a black actor, another guy played by a Latino actor, and the white guy who almost tried to mind rape her.
For the record, the romance between Han and Leia is the part I skip while watching TESB. I would rather it not be a part of the saga...period.Would you feel this way if Finn had been portrayed by a white actor?
Why not question the idea of Leia becoming romantically involved with someone? Oh right. Han was played by a white actor.
There is a difference between romance and emotional involvement. Study Plato.If that's the case, then NO ONE in the entire Star Wars saga should not have been emotionally involved with someone. Or . . . they should have been emotionally involved with blood relatives or a religious organization.
considering that the only three potential mates for Rey is a guy played by a black actor, another guy played by a Latino actor, and the white guy who almost tried to mind rape her.
Ok... So maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree here, bringing up TPT, but isn't it established that Jedi are not to fall in love and get married and have families?
That reads pretty much like angry fan reviews of everythinghttps://twitter.com/botnikstudios/status/942911487244406786
Here we have some autogenerated TLJ reviews.
Is it like writing an essay on a subject and you want to use all the buzz words to impress the teacher?That reads pretty much like angry fan reviews of everything![]()
Rey and Finn have that potential.In the end, they will go for a love story. We all know this. And, in the end, they will go with the one guy (or girl) with whom Rey/Daisy Ridley has the most chemistry on screen. ROMANTIC CHEMISTRY.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.