• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Grading & Discussion

Grade the movie.


  • Total voters
    290
Have been spoilered, and do t agree with almost any of the story choices made, have read the arguments for and against, and basically, I hope the execution is damned amazing.
Otherwise they are just killing old heroes for shits and giggles at this point. Not before totally screwing them up first...Han got stripped of his happy ending and killed, Luke too from what I see, totally character assassinated, and there’s nothing left for Leia but dying after seeing her life’s work and family relationships all destroyed. What next? Lando asking for small change before being shot?
I’ll watch it, but I do not have hope.

I disagree with the majority of the world at this point that Luke was killed, but the point is made by both Leia and Rey at the end of the film that they have never felt an incredible sense of purpose. Luke has moved on to another plane of existence and has become more powerful than anyone could imagine (to paraphrase A New Hope). I fully believe that there is a story point to the ending of the film beyond what most people have considered.
 
I'm starting to come around to the theory/wishful thinking that there are actually going to be two more. Splitting the final movie in two is practically obligatory for series, these days (even Avengers is doing it, so it's spreading beyond direct literary adaptations). Maybe Episode XI is the end of this trilogy, thematically, and then they tie off the whole saga with an Episode X, capping off the trilogy of trilogies.

I'd kind of rather they do a second trilogy with these characters forging ahead and standing on their own against new challenges, rather than living in the shadow of the previous generation or even stuck handing off the baton to anyone else just yet. Basically the kind of trilogy me might have gotten had Lucas decided to do the ST in the late 80's/early 90's.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with the majority of the world at this point that Luke was killed, but the point is made by both Leia and Rey at the end of the film that they have never felt an incredible sense of purpose. Luke has moved on to another plane of existence and has become more powerful than anyone could imagine (to paraphrase A New Hope). I fully believe that there is a story point to the ending of the film beyond what most people have considered.

Not seen it as I say, but it’s already leading to me actually hoping it’s one of those times j j just ignores stuff. If it pans out the way it’s described, and from what you say, maybe he just invented a force transporter lol. Would make a change from breaking the heroes then killing them off. Shame George gave up after 3D phantom menace.
 
I disagree with the majority of the world at this point that Luke was killed, but the point is made by both Leia and Rey at the end of the film that they have never felt an incredible sense of purpose. Luke has moved on to another plane of existence and has become more powerful than anyone could imagine (to paraphrase A New Hope). I fully believe that there is a story point to the ending of the film beyond what most people have considered.
There usually is, and Hamil has hinted at coming back, so I would love to see how that all wraps up.
 
Most fans are human and fallible (add to that the fact that most people are no longer reading fiction, much less the myths and classics), so most fans take character deaths in a literal sense.

"See you around, kid!" doesn't sound to me like a final curtain call. I'm anticipating at least one encore.
 
Most fans are human and fallible (add to that the fact that most people are no longer reading fiction, much less the myths and classics), so most fans take character deaths in a literal sense.

"See you around, kid!" doesn't sound to me like a final curtain call. I'm anticipating at least one encore.
Very interesting. I'd like to hear more about the fans that aren't human, and infallible.

#Godisatrekkie
 
Very interesting. I'd like to hear more about the fans that aren't human, and infallible.

#Godisatrekkie
Just hedging my bets that one fan might be infallible and inhuman. We've all see Galaxy Quest and that episode of Futurama.
 
I'm starting to come around to the theory/wishful thinking that there are actually going to be two more.

It's Disney, not Lucas.
There's gonna be movies with this cast for as long as they make $1 billion+ at the box office. ;)
 
I've seen it three times in the cinema and my opinion of it has improved a bit, even if Rian Johnson got a bit too cocky and its subplots pissed a lot of people off.
 
It's Disney, not Lucas.
There's gonna be movies with this cast for as long as they make $1 billion+ at the box office. ;)
Do you think Han Solo will do a Billeeoonn? I'm gonna put out a prediction right now

$787,000,000 worldwide.
 
No, but it doesn't mean they can't be changed either. I agree that a romance for Rey would absolutely be within the pattern. But, I also think it is within the same pattern to have a hero learn ancient mystic ways and not be in a relationship. in both instances, a pattern is being followed

The difference here is that Rey is not purposely removing herself from relationships like Obi-Wan or Luke. She's the other side of the traditional fairy tale coin in being a heroine who also can find romance.

No, it isn't pointless because it speaks to the intention on the part of the author.

Its pointless as it comes off as a line inserted into the crawl of ROTS, yet is never seen in the actual film--not to any degree. Where are the "heroes" on the side represented by Sidious, Dooku, Greivous, or the Trade Federation? It did not exist, because Lucas did not intend for there to be shadings of gray (which would be the opposite of his reason for drawing clear ideas of good and evil in creating Star Wars in the post anti-hero / disillusioned films released in the ten years before Star Wars hit screens).


None of this in TLJ runs "off the track" of traditional fairy tale mythos either. You can't discount TPM either because the base of the argument is "For six films..."

I did not discount TMP. I noted it was produced in the 20th century, with the rest of the PT in the 21st, as a matter of chronological accuracy. That does not alter what I posted days ago:

Suddenly going off in different directions (again, for no valid reason, other than for change's sake) makes little sense, hence the reason Lucas did not do that in a trilogy produced between the mid 70s to early 80s, and another largely (with the exception of TPM) from the early 21st. Very different social and political eras, yet Lucas remained on his course.

The PT is not some radical course change from how Lucas followed the traditional myth motifs, for the logical reason that in-universe, the PT had to naturally lead into the OT, with its very clear myth traditions from start to finish. The sequel trilogy is the one which clearly goes off track. Like the days of the Expanded Universe, if there are characters and/or stories that need to go in its own direction, then its best to create its own series independent of the Skywalker story.

And then she ignored the problems and her own values for the sake of her love. You are correct in that it is tragic, but not for the reasons being argued. It is tragic in that she feels she must throw away her fears and risk her career, and to hell with the consequences. It doesn't feel like it flows from the character in a smooth way. This is partially damaged by the cutting of Padme's arc in ROTS, as well as the deleted scene with Padme's family.

"Throwing away" career and other duties for love is not only one of the longest lived plot devices in literature/cultural myths, but its real world counterpart predates that. You seem to be suggesting that her life was her career/duties--as if that is what she should value above all else. A life without love (the most natural of human desires) is not living at all, particularly if one consciously shunts it aside all for a career, or the alleged value of duties.

That's the part that bothers be-necessary to Anakin's fall. None of it feels like these players have agency. Just wheels in fate's (or the Force's?) machine work that they cannot stop.

Tragic romance in fairy tales have players who make their own decisions; in SW, the will of the Force directs certain events, but all characters have free will to do--or not do--the things that point their lives in a certain direction. Padme being a player in a tragic romance does not remove her responsibility in all that happens, despite the Force being pushed out of balance, and attempting to correct that through the Skywalker children. Knowing Padme made her own decisions gives her plight some weight, as she was fighting to right all that went wrong until her last breath.

And it's better than Rey becoming romantically involved with the black guy. Why not admit it?

As I've observed not only on TrekBBS, but elsewhere, some create a universe of excuses why Finn and Rey should not be together...excuses that do not hold up to questioning, which usually leaves one time-honored sickness as the true reason for the never-ending resistance to the idea.

Now the Rey/Poe shippers are materializing. I guess it's important that Rey either has no romantic interest by the end the trilogy or that she either ships with Kylo Ren or Poe Dameron . . . anything other than her shipping with Finn. Because . . . hey, we can't have a young white woman having a romance with a black guy.:rolleyes:

Yes--a homicidal dictator or a guy she barely knows...instead of the one character that naturally bonded with her not only as a friend, but--if you look at her expression as Finn is pulling the sheet on Rose / her message to Chewbacca which (despite no on-screen translation) would not be retreading a message of a friendship both she and Finn already know exists. Nope--that's all buried with one Poe scene and fantasies that Rey will "save" Ren in time for the two to become an item.
 
TREK_GOD_1 said:
As I've observed not only on TrekBBS, but elsewhere, some create a universe of excuses why Finn and Rey should not be together...

I think it's more "need not be together" than "should not be together".
 
Finn's the practical choice for a romance, it's just the one the producers will never do. Actually, I can't see them giving her getting any actual factual romantic interest.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top