Of course you can.You can't please anyone
They can't please everyone, but that was always true.
Of course you can.You can't please anyone
Gross.I will share the pain, and gain strength from the sharing.
![]()
BSG did 9/11 stuff?BSG did the 'lost in space' stuff a million times better than Voyager, and the 9/11 stuff a thousand times better than the Xindi arc in ENT.
BSG did the 'lost in space' stuff a million times better than Voyager, and the 9/11 stuff a thousand times better than the Xindi arc in ENT.
Then you had SG-1 which did 'space adventure of the week' better than either of those two Trek shows, throw in a couple of dogshit-tier TNG movies and Trek has been second rate ever since, unfortunately.
Berman/Braga Trek did not evolve to compete, and NuTrek has done nothing to rehabilitate the franchise.
It was like a million 9/11s.BSG did 9/11 stuff?
I would be entirely unsurprised that the dream ending business was studio interference. I don't know that feedback from season 3 would have been necessary as a motivator; just watching the episode could easily have done it.
I think it's probably for the best that the Year One thing doesn't come about, personally. But that's me.
The picture of the survivor is fairly 9/11It was like a million 9/11s.
Oh, they could most certainly stretch out Year One to more than one streaming season. Just because one can does not mean one should, but that would be absolutely doable. Remember one season of the original show could be upwards of 24 episodes; the first season was almost thirty.
Too much set up costs for a 1 year series
We saw the bridge update from DIS to SNW
I remember Georgeau 'Eww, orange'
Don't you get it? It's okay when Berman did it, because he got what Star Trek actually IS (or so I say these days). However, Kurtzman does it and it's WRONG and ABHORRENT as he is hedonistic swine and I will continue to think of him as such until twenty years from now when someone else is in charge of the franchise and they become the target of my hatred making Kurtzman seem okay now.![]()
It kind of already did that with Voyager.
Plus, the courtroom is the thing described as accurate in Encounter at Farpoint, not Q's outfit.

And it's also worth pointing out, in the twenty-five years since that episode aired, not one person complained about those Q wearing the 21st century judge's robes. Yet, Kurtzman does it with a character who is only implied to be a Q and we see That Crowd pull out their pitchforks and torches in rage over it.Well, whaddya know - people holding the Kurtzman era to a double standard again?
I'm shocked. Well, not that shocked.
Sounds like I theatre I went to to see Beyond ten years ago.I went to the showing of TWOK and Space Seed on Saturday. My sister and I were on the younger end of the audience. Most people were in their late 60s to late 70s. There was even a lady in a walker. No younger people at all in the audience. Definitely no teens or twenty somethings.
Since the current expectation is recapturing the glory days of the Berman era forever sleep but not be a bad idea.Its last rest from TV didn't do a whole lot of good. Unless you mean... "forever sleep" to quote my namesake in which case, yes, perhaps.
I have absolutely no memory of that scene. If you showed it to me out of context I would say it's a cheap fan production.![]()
It kind of already did that with Voyager.
The judges are from Q2. They are judgingTrelane, what? Don't look at me like that, fine for shorthandJunior so the outfits do make sense. It is how Q has made others perceive him when he is in a judging role.
Q are just very judgemental. They'd have probably exterminated humanity if Trelane failed his school project
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.