Not even a little bit to me.TMP DOES feel In continuity with TOS..![]()
Mileage will vary.
Not even a little bit to me.TMP DOES feel In continuity with TOS..![]()
There is a reason why older people tend to need help using a mobile phone compared to the phones they grew up with, even though both can make and receive calls.Well then why did Data have to tell him he could recreate the TOS bridge on the Holodeck? That is what he told the computer when he went to the Holodeck. As a pioneer in the technology he should only have been told they "we have a Holodeck here that you helped pioneer. Go nuts."![]()
No way. Not nearly on the level of Trek. Star Wars errors are extremely minor to treks ....
Based upon the standards poisted in this thread the below dialog makes Riker look stupid:There is a reason why older people tend to need help using a mobile phone compared to the phones they grew up with, even though both can make and receive calls.
But that's different. Somehow.Based upon the standards poisted in this thread the below dialog makes Riker look stupid:
RIKER: Ensign, can you help me find Commander Data? I understand he's somewhere on this deck.
ENSIGN: This way, sir. You must be new to these Galaxy class starships, sir. (to wall) Tell me the location of Commander Data.
COMPUTER: Lieutenant Commander Data now located in Holodeck area 4J.
ENSIGN: And as you see, sir, it's pointing you that way.
RIKER: Thank you
ENSIGN: You're welcome, sir.
"Who designed this ship anyway?"Based upon the standards poisted in this thread the below dialog makes Riker look stupid:
RIKER: Ensign, can you help me find Commander Data? I understand he's somewhere on this deck.
ENSIGN: This way, sir. You must be new to these Galaxy class starships, sir. (to wall) Tell me the location of Commander Data.
COMPUTER: Lieutenant Commander Data now located in Holodeck area 4J.
ENSIGN: And as you see, sir, it's pointing you that way.
RIKER: Thank you
ENSIGN: You're welcome, sir.
Well, it was a $40 million remake of TOS S2 The Changeling.TMP DOES feel In continuity with TOS..![]()
"we don't mention Sulu's predecessor here".Same reason you tell a person what books you have in the library. “Here’s something you might.”
We aren't privy to the conversation between Data and Scott about holodecks. (Or even the one with Geordi beyond the one mention) Scotty very well might have said, "Laddie, I tested the first ship board holodeck. La'An almost..." At which point Geordi probably cut him off.
Because that's not how the holodeck he tested worked?Well then why did Data have to tell him he could recreate the TOS bridge on the Holodeck? That is what he told the computer when he went to the Holodeck. As a pioneer in the technology he should only have been told they "we have a Holodeck here that you helped pioneer. Go nuts."![]()
That was the 0.003% he lostThe only explanation that makes sense to me, and it is a painful one at that, is Scotty did suffer pattern degradation in the buffer. The memory center of his brain was affected; either storage or retrieval capacity was lost to some degree.
"we don't mention Sulu's predecessor here".
You're...you're joking, right?
One need only look at the Original Trilogy to see retcon after retcon. Vader started out as the guy who killed Luke's father in Star Wars, only to become his actual dad in Empire...simply because Lucas thought this was a better twist than having Obi-wan being the true murderer. Luke wanted to bang his sister for two movies because Lucas only decided they were twins when writing Return of the Jedi. And don't get me started on Han vs Greedo, that only proved how much of a revisionist Lucas was. How many times did he have to redo a scene he got right the first damn time? There's more discrepancies, further exacerbated by the Prequels and more, but you get my point.
Lucas loves to claim he planned all three, no wait six, no wait nine, movies ahead of time. But anyone who watched interviews at the time or read The Secret History of Star Wars, knows this is complete bullshit. He was making it up as he went along. And it shows.
As others have pointed out, Star Wars has much less content than Star Trek, in terms of actual hours of TV and film. It also has one predominant writer vs many for Trek. I love Star Wars...I was a Star Wars fan long before I became a Star Trek fan. But Star Wars has way more obvious and egregious continuity errors than Star Trek ever had, especially considering it's lesser content and single author.
Lucas had NO CLUE of where the Star Wars saga would go. Heck the main characters were being changed a lot in development. Han Solo was a green shinned monster with gills and Luke Skywalker was called Annakin Starkiller who was a general from a family of dwarfs. The first movie wasn't even called episode 4 A New Hope on release. It was simply called Star Wars. And don't try and tell me Luke and Leia were meant to be brother and sister all along when you had the two of them kissing in the second movie. Give me a break. That was a last second change as was Vader being Luke's father. Lucas is the biggest BS artist in history. NONE of that stuff was well planned nor thought out.You're...you're joking, right?
One need only look at the Original Trilogy to see retcon after retcon. Vader started out as the guy who killed Luke's father in Star Wars, only to become his actual dad in Empire...simply because Lucas thought this was a better twist than having Obi-wan being the true murderer. Luke wanted to bang his sister for two movies because Lucas only decided they were twins when writing Return of the Jedi. And don't get me started on Han vs Greedo, that only proved how much of a revisionist Lucas was. How many times did he have to redo a scene he got right the first damn time? There's more discrepancies, further exacerbated by the Prequels and more, but you get my point.
Lucas loves to claim he planned all three, no wait six, no wait nine, movies ahead of time. But anyone who watched interviews at the time or read The Secret History of Star Wars, knows this is complete bullshit. He was making it up as he went along. And it shows.
As others have pointed out, Star Wars has much less content than Star Trek, in terms of actual hours of TV and film. It also has one predominant writer vs many for Trek. I love Star Wars...I was a Star Wars fan long before I became a Star Trek fan. But Star Wars has way more obvious and egregious continuity errors than Star Trek ever had, especially considering it's lesser content and single author.
Then I have a bridge in San Francisco to sell you. It's also golden.Those are not continuity issues. It's called adding backstory. None of it contradicted ANH. Of course Lucas didn't have all three films planned out. Any nerd worth his salt knows this. What you are describing is not continuity or canon.
As for Han shooting Greedo second. So what??That was redone and Lucas had every right to. If the original creators of TNG want to go into the episodes and edit them to make more sense with SNW they are welcome to. I have no problem with that. But for now that that is not the case....
No one will ever convince me that Star Trek is on the same level as Star Wars when it concerns story cohesion. Star wars is gold compared to copper Star Trek in that regard.
lol noStar wars is gold compared to copper Star Trek in that regard.
Yes. Absolutely YES....lol no
Realistically, the cat shouldn't have even let him grip onto the amount of the door he was. Really, as soon as Jack grabbed hold of the door, the cat should have just glared at him all "WTF, bro?" until Jack let go and froze to death away from the door. But I understand the folks behind the video had to work with the pre-existing movie footage.And the cat still wouldn't make room for Jack on the door.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.