No, that's not what's going on here. Dak'Rah egging him on isn't starting the fight in this context at all. That's nothing compared to the atrocities that he committed. M'Benga wouldn't have knifed him the heart had that been all there was to it. And M'Benga wouldn't be able to tell Pike with a straight faced authenticity that he didn't start the fight if it was only about him being egged on. He's clearly referring to the events of the war.Even if he were only referring to that day's events, he could honestly say that he didn't start the fight. Dak'Rah was the one who insisted on engaging with M'Benga repeatedly, up until the last moment when he went to M'Benga's quarters (office?) and wouldn't leave even after the truth was out.
What an excellent heartfelt review. You touched on a lot of things I got out of my second viewing but from the perspective of someone who's served. This was such a complex uneasy episode. I love that Star Trek is back and gets to do what it always did so well.I enjoyed this episode, both as a GWOT veteran and M'Benga fan. M'Benga really embodied a man of duty who still worked hard to fit the mold of Starfleet even with the trauma he was holding inside. My take from this is a man who once killed others that chose to become a doctor, take an oath of preserving life to save the Federation he believes in during the height of a bloody war only to break that oath in a deeply painful way to stop the atrocities on J'gal, he hates the blood he has on his hands and I respect him for understanding the consequences of his own choices even when they hurt but produce a better outcome.
Flash forward to his interactions with Rah on the Enterprise and he is not only doing his best to face resurfaced traumas from only a couple of years back but also facing the cowardly man now masquerading as a reformed diplomat who drove him to break his oath as a doctor and go on the warpath to wipe J'gal of the marauding Klingon commanders, a man sitting on a throne of make-believe and false glories soaking up the sun as his world of lies built on injustices insults the very real sacrifice made of both Federation and Klingon on that distant blood soaked moon.
The sparing match again shows Rah as powerful and abusive yet weak in his resolve as he has nothing to stand on in the lies and shame he's surrounded himself with, a facade of a person where M'Benga is humanly vulnerable and physically weaker yet enduring, standing by his experiences knowing the truth, living with it and drawing strength from his sense of resolve and integrity in the face of evil tempting him to break and be just as weak as it is, as weak as Rah knows himself to be inside propping up a convenient lie for his own benefit.
As we see M'Benga suffer both in the present and in the past he remains the believer struggling to do right. In the end I feel he grabbed the knife from storage not only as a touchstone to his past, an item of pain from a time where the world seemed so far away and nothing felt right but also proof, proof that he was the one who killed those commanders on J'gal, proof that he was the one who had to make a hard decision and kill for what he felt was right, and foremost proof that Rah was a liar and he could prove it to the world with the evidence that very blade carried if he so decided. Rah confronting M'Benga in the face of that proof showed Rah for the evil he is, a coward who knows he can't bully M'Benga into siding with him and knowing full well that M'Benga is the key to his demise and that d'k tahg is all he needs to show Rah for who he truly is to everyone. Rah calls M'Benga a selfish human in a raised voice showing that he finds M'Benga's unwillingness to let the truth of the past go to be revolting to him in the light of possibly being exposed. While we don't see the fight unfold in detail my personal take away was that Rah attempted to take the knife away so that no evidence would exist of his lies, M'Benga wanting to preserve not only that evidence but a touchstone to his own moral choices wrestled with Rah to keep possession of the knife and in the ensuing bout over it Rah was accidentally impaled subsequently killing him.
While M'Benga may not have started the struggle, or even intentionally killed Rah, he's honest that the outcome is something he can live with as in a way justice was served in his eyes. That's why in the end when he addresses Pike as friends about the fight he isn't lying or covering up as he still is a man of genuine integrity, still a believer in the good of Starfleet, yet human enough to admit that Rah's death felt good to him in a way Pike will never be able to understand. Consequences are obviously likely on the horizon for M'Benga even in the accidental death of an individual but I appreciate that the priority of the story is not will M'Benga get in trouble but instead that he is only human, a scarred human, who spends his hard days trying to fix biobed number 2 yet can never seem to fix the problem. That these demons live with us regardless of time, distance, justice served or given even as we continually try and work on ourselves to be more, be better. This story really stuck with me and my own experiences of war and living, but more so embodies the little thing I love the most about Trek, and that is regardless of the hill to climb, enemy to face, hardship to endure, there is always more awe and beauty to be found out there, and that the victories come in the form of friendship, discovery, love, and growth. An episode that makes you appreciate the happy episodes even more.
Thank-you for pointing it out. I have to admit when I see a post that takes me three screens to scroll through I often just glance and skip past. Worth a second look.What an excellent heartfelt review. You touched on a lot of things I got out of my second viewing but from the perspective of someone who's served. This was such a complex uneasy episode. I love that Star Trek is back and gets to do what it always did so well.
I don't think the tech for seperating weapons, items, & gear while in the transporter buffer was common until the 24th century.
If you get to 8.9 sell.I’ll go 8/10. But it’s a high 8…like 8.6-8.7.
Especially if you watch an episode like "Aid Station," like I just did. A very well done episode that could have taken the show in a much different direction with the characters.On a lighter note…it is kinda funny to think of M’Benga as Hawkeye (or Col. Blake based on his fishing cap from last season) and Christine as Hot Lips Houlihan.
I mean, she was still a cadet.Like it was real easy for Uhura to dismiss Ortegas’ qualms about the guy.
If you get to 8.9 sell.
Especially if you watch an episode like "Aid Station," like I just did. A very well done episode that could have taken the show in a much different direction with the characters.
I mean, she was still a cadet.
Well since we didn't learn our lesson after Vietnam (first loss since 1812) and just compounded it in Afghanistan, the chances that we learn from Afghanistan are small....After Vietnam and Afghanistan, I think the idea of sending large occupation forces to sit on a location for decades is presumably never going to be repeated again...
That is not correct. The creators and writers of DS9 never waffled about Dukat. They always presented it as "from Dukat's point of view he feels he justified", but the show itself never supporting that view. Viewers interpreted it that way because Alaimo was such a good badguy, and (face it) because some people are just weird in that they will support the most vile people if they are charismatic or put up a "toughguy" persona. They wrote "Waltz" specifically to make it totally clear to any fans who were supportive of Dukat that he was a maniac and wrong....One of my complaints about Deep Space Nine is the fact that Gul Dukat is meant to be a Nazi officer and the show waffled between the idea that he was redeemable or not. I feel like they made the right call by settling on the fact, “Dukat is incapable of reform and will always be a monster because the kind of man who did the thing he did is incapable of seeing what he did as wrong.”
Couple of points here. 1) No way was Rah anything as bad as Eichmann. Rah didn't organize a genocide, he was a military commander who committed war crimes (indiscriminate targeting of civilians) in, as far as we know, one major battle in a (shortish) war. 2) While his actions might be considered war crimes by the Federation, and even dishonorable when looked at by the most rigid version of Klingon honor (for example Worf's), even Klingons say "there is nothing more honorable in war than victory". 3) Rah isn't considered a mass murderer by the Klingons. We the viewer assume that at first (because of Ortegas's comments), but the name "Butcher of J'Gal" though it may have been coined by the Federation was adopted by Klingons because Rah defected and claimed to have killed his own men. That is why he is also a "Butcher" to the Klingons, not because he targeted civilians.Weirdly, my biggest comment about this episode is, "How stupid is the Federation?" Going with the above Eichmann example, General Dak'Rah is a guy SO SCUMMY and SO DISHONORABLE that the Klingons call what he did mass murder and this is a guy the Federation appoints as an ambassador. It's akin to appointing Ted Bundy or Jim Jones to be the ambassador to the United States. Yes, Ted and Jim would know United States culture but it's an insult and I can't imagine did the Federation any favors. It really goes a long way to suggest the Federation does not understand the Klingons on ANY conceptual level...
I wouldn't say it is impossible that Chapel, either now or in the future, believes that she saw what she said she saw. She has her own PTSD to deal with and a strong bond with M'Benga that could lead her to believe what she wants to believe. Just an idea....She'd better not ever have to place her hand on the circular light of truth thingy about this, or she's going to be in trouble.
This makes me wonder: is SNW going to end the Chapel/Spock relationship soon (say now, or in season 3?) or keep it an on-again, off-again thing throughout the whole series? We know the powers-that-be are loath to drop will-they/won't-they relationships if they don't have to (TV shows love that tension, even for characters that didn't need it). I personally would appreciate the rest of Chapel's story in SNW to not have to depend on Spock a la TOS....Speaking of Chapel, it's rather sad that we never saw a happy minute in their romance. I figure it's deader than Khan at the end of Star Trek II. It would have been nice to have seen some happiness for a little while. We know that by TOS that it wasn't a thing, but would it have hurt to see a little joy for a little while?
Something...something mutual trust...something respect.and sure Uhura was just a cadet but still, the guy just laid on the charm and everyone rolled over except for the 3 war vets and only Spock really noticed until things got real.
If people didn't learn not to invade Russia in the winter I have a feeling you're right.Well since we didn't learn our lesson after Vietnam (first loss since 1812) and just compounded it in Afghanistan, the chances that we learn from Afghanistan are small.
Probably.This makes me wonder: is SNW going to end the Chapel/Spock relationship soon
Ugh, Disco Klingons.
??
I'm asking because what do the Disco Klingons have to do with this episode (other than them being shown from Disco footage in the recap at the beginning)?
I just didn’t like seeing them even in flashbacks. Hate the design, glad they went back to a more traditional look.
Couple of points here. 1) No way was Rah anything as bad as Eichmann. Rah didn't organize a genocide, he was a military commander who committed war crimes (indiscriminate targeting of civilians) in, as far as we know, one major battle in a (shortish) war. 2) While his actions might be considered war crimes by the Federation, and even dishonorable when looked at by the most rigid version of Klingon honor (for example Worf's), even Klingons say "there is nothing more honorable in war than victory". 3) Rah isn't considered a mass murderer by the Klingons. We the viewer assume that at first (because of Ortegas's comments), but the name "Butcher of
That said, it was a really good episode. But I’m not sure about the ending. I don’t have a problem with M’Benga killing the guy but something about the way it all wraps up felt…off. I can’t put my finger on why though. Maybe we needed a bit more with Pike either throughout the episode or extend the scene at the end. Maybe more wrap up with Chapel and M’Benga. I dunno.
As a MASH fan, I definitely agree. M'Benga even suggested the patented Hawkeye heart massage to save the guy. I'm sure that, among other things, was an intentional callout to the series.On a lighter note…it is kinda funny to think of M’Benga as Hawkeye (or Col. Blake based on his fishing cap from last season) and Christine as Hot Lips Houlihan.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.