Same, but I'm repeatedly told I'm wrong and I don't understand being a fan.Draw in the crowd, or draw in the smaller groups of fans? Time will tell if that's a profitable strategy.
Personally, I prefer less fanservice and more fresh stuff.


Same, but I'm repeatedly told I'm wrong and I don't understand being a fan.Draw in the crowd, or draw in the smaller groups of fans? Time will tell if that's a profitable strategy.
Personally, I prefer less fanservice and more fresh stuff.
I love it when they use real Physics in their 3D Space manuevers
I concur, but the choice of manuever is what I have a problem with. Not the fact on whether or not he can accomplish said manuever.
Kirk exposed a VERY wide silhouette towards his attacker when a different manuever wouldn't have exposed nearly as much.
Another issue I noticed on the USS Faragut, where were the aft Phaser Turrets?
Why wasn't the Dorsal Phaser Turrets firing the entire time they were doing the Immelman?
Did they only have Phaser Turrets on the Ventral side, because that's the only time they started firing.
I think so. I have vague memories of that at least. It was something that hadn't really been shown before. So, it was new. And you know how people often react to new things. But it was all based on physics, and I loved it too!Did they? That was one of the scenes that absolutely sold me (and the rest of the folks in my house) on the show.
Go back in time, kill pike with a bat’leth.I'm a little curious what the Batleth centered solution the Monks wanted to do before Movie Pike convinced them to let him go back.
they’ve had this nickname for a long time.I've been a Star Trek fan since 1988, and I don't ever recall hearing or seeing the term Monster Maroon. Is there anything about the monster part? Is this a reference to old actors gaining weight?
More a reference to how heavy the jacket was, being made out of wool.I've been a Star Trek fan since 1988, and I don't ever recall hearing or seeing the term Monster Maroon. Is there anything about the monster part? Is this a reference to old actors gaining weight?
Go back in time, kill pike with a bat’leth.
Seems like Kirk is better at thinking on his feet and figuring out how to avoid getting hit by a surprise attack then Pike.Yeah the space battle portion was a bit of a let down. There were a ton of missed phaser shots at close range.
But a key point from "Balance of Terror" seemed to have been overlooked by Kirk and Pike and that was the firing of the plasma torpedo. In "Balance of Terror" Kirk had the Enterprise warp in reverse in an attempt to avoid getting hit by the torpedo. We know in SNW's version the plasma torpedo can be dodged by warping away. So a missed opportunity.
Given Pike's history that is not surprising.Good episode. Lots of Christ/Christian themes surrounding Pike throughout all of this - fully knowing one's destiny, still ultimately embracing that destiny for the good of others even at great personal cost, taking on the possible fates of others (such as Spock in this episode) in a redemptive way. Hopefully it won't be a long wait for season 2!
Yup, properly demonstrated in this ep.As stated above Kirk is more emotionally adaptive to unfolding crises than Pike seems to be. Kirk prefers the diplomatic approach but is more than willing to go the "hit them and give them a bloody nose" strategy if it means his ship and crew and the wider Federation come out intact.
I think so. I have vague memories of that at least. It was something that hadn't really been shown before. So, it was new. And you know how people often react to new things. But it was all based on physics, and I loved it too!
As opposed to an SF audience who is like "FUCK SCIENCE! Do a barrel roll, bitch!"?You loved it, I loved it, others loved it, the show lasted five seasons and got spinoffs.
And then we got The Expanse for six seasons. I'd say there's a ready SF audience for shows with accurate science!
STO has this weapon you can put on Romulan ships, its slow and unwieldy but when it hit it really hitsYup, properly demonstrated in this ep.
What I'm more surprised about is why we don't see the Plasma Cannon Ball launcher more often in the future.
Was the close-range weakness too much to over-come or adapt to?
Or did the existence of the Plasma Torpedo largely negate the value of the Plasma Cannon Ball in the future?
Yup, properly demonstrated in this ep.
What I'm more surprised about is why we don't see the Plasma Cannon Ball launcher more often in the future.
Was the close-range weakness too much to over-come or adapt to?
Or did the existence of the Plasma Torpedo largely negate the value of the Plasma Cannon Ball in the future?
Yup, properly demonstrated in this ep.
What I'm more surprised about is why we don't see the Plasma Cannon Ball launcher more often in the future.
Was the close-range weakness too much to over-come or adapt to?
Or did the existence of the Plasma Torpedo largely negate the value of the Plasma Cannon Ball in the future?
I love accuracy in science fiction. Have for a long time. I just don't expect it in my Star Trek or Star Wars.
I never expected it from Star Trek either. ESP pretty much sold that to me as "eh...soft science."I don't expect it in Star Wars, which never pretended to be science fiction. I was disappointed when Trek stopped being a science fiction show.
Doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it, but it was disappointing. But I get it. Science fiction is hard.
I don't think Pike on Talos IV is the end of his story. We don't know what happens to him after "The Menagerie". So they can do something there, eventually.
I never expected it from Star Trek either. ESP pretty much sold that to me as "eh...soft science."
So, yeah, I won't pretend Star Trek is any harder than Star Wars. It just faked it well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.