• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: Starships Model/Magazine Subscription

A long time ago, I read some article online delineating the notable differences between the TAS-E and the TOS-E, driving some to speculate that she may have undergone an intermediate refit prior to the full TMP refit.
memory-alpha certainly considers the TAS changes and additions part of a refit, which was reasonable until disco-prise also become a refit, or pre-fit or some shit.
 
memory-alpha certainly considers the TAS changes and additions part of a refit, which was reasonable until disco-prise also become a refit, or pre-fit or some shit.

With the TAS version, you can squint your eyes and write off the second bridge turbolift as part of the new bridge module. A bit harder to reconcile the Discovery changes in universe.
 
Early this year, I took the position on a whim that the TOS filming model was built with forced perspective to make the ship appear longer in front angle views. Rear shots used a different lens to expand the rear out straighter which also shrunk the forward part of the ship to also make it appear longer/bigger. I re-sketched the secondary hull to remove said perspective and the result in fact look more TAS-like: gave more room in the hangar bay; and raised the two rear windows up to put them on the observation deck instead of in the middle of the decks. In filmation drawings (the artist picks the views and angles), there is no camera lens selections as you see with model filming...some people thought this was a heretic exercise.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/eng...rprise-revisited.297971/page-31#post-12888902

I've speculated the Star Trek Beyond version of the Enterprise was redesigned in forced perspective to look longer from the front and back, and the ship was filmed in such a way to minimize how weird it looked from the sides and top (most, if not all, views of the entire ship from those angles are either from an extreme distance, or are obscured and seen through Yorktown's glass tunnels and canals).
 
I've speculated the Star Trek Beyond version of the Enterprise was redesigned in forced perspective to look longer from the front and back, and the ship was filmed in such a way to minimize how weird it looked from the sides and top (most, if not all, views of the entire ship from those angles are either from an extreme distance, or are obscured and seen through Yorktown's glass tunnels and canals.
according to the magazine, she was redesigned without concept art, they just took the CG model and distorted it until they got a look they liked. if they had gone the concept art route, she probably wouldn't have ended up looking quite so weird. but i actually really like the weirdness. the enterprise is a weird ship in any form when you get down to it.
 
Well I received the Cloaked Defiant today and... the little tiny magazine was all crunched up inside the box... and then the nose fell off! At $40 I will be contacting Eaglemoss. :(
 
Would Love an X Plane set! Venture star, Shuttle.. Be nice.

They shrank the neck and pylons to appear weaker than the ITD one... which was stupid, and looks like crap.
 
On Twitter, Ben replied to Irish Trekkie that if enough people were willing to buy, he could ask his bosses about a NASA/ESA collection, comparing it to the non-canon ships that got made.

Link: https://twitter.com/bencsrobinson/status/1195423880288129026?s=21

For reference, the non-canon ships required 5.000 people to voice interest in the petition.


Personally, I’d love Voyager 2 and the space shuttles Enterprise & Buran.

Goddammit would I love that!!
But please in the standard size, not XXL. I don't buy those. The small but detailed enough size really is the best part of the collection.

Also, do the NSEA Protector from Galaxy Quest. Please.
 
I'd like to see that finished. I think the TAS Enterprise needs more love.
I appreciate the thoughts, but I'm not skilled enough nor have the computer tools to tackle it. Beside, I'm still wrestling with the scale of the Enterprise (947 v. 1080 or more); clearly, the TAS-E is bigger than 947. More room is needed for the bridge and its second turbolift, and especially the huge shuttlebay as seen in Mudd's Passion.
tas-MP-Shuttlebay.jpg

I think Shaw did a neat job putting the various TAS Engine Rooms into his model. Also, I'm not sold on some other goofy areas like the Dilithium Crystal Chamber from The Terratin Incident. :)
tas-ti-pan.jpg
 
Visited Forbidden Planet in Manchester, UK for the first time in over a year. There’re no Eaglemoss ships or mags. Was hoping to get the SS Lakul.
 
The Akira/Thunderchild arrived yesterday. Beautiful model. They have definitely learned the hard lesson about trying to line up window decals with recessed surface details and removed the physical recesses entirely. The actual alignment of the windows, however, seems super-wonky to me, as if the decks to which they are supposed to be aligned are actually rolling hills. Probably due to the odd shape of the twin catamaran hulls. They just couldn't figure out how to make the texture mapping line up with real decks. Which is fine - the original probably had that problem too. Most of these models were never intended for up-close scurtiny.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top