Another 1. But keep trying.That's equivalent to whatever joke you thought you were making. Wasn't worth any more thought than that.
Another 1. But keep trying.That's equivalent to whatever joke you thought you were making. Wasn't worth any more thought than that.
Ok, I can respect that view. I can see that for other types of situations, such as the one you described.Sometimes it really does help to just be acknowledged. One could make a parallel to a person with a terminal illness, they may not want help or pity because it reminds them of their weakness or mortality and so you have to meet people on their terms sometimes.
I saw the beauty and the fun in the compromise that was met with the Klingons. Everyone was able to get what they wanted in a way that worked for everyone.
Isn't that baked in to most Star Trek species? They are all kind of one stereotype that needs one thing in order for them to continue as a planet/race/species.Ok, I can respect that view. I can see that for other types of situations, such as the one you described.
I still think having the entire species require that pandering for their own survival is . . . silly.
On paper I would entirely agree with you, a variety of opinions is vastly more desirable but these opinions need to come from a genuine place and not be formed before even watching an episode, or not bothering to watch it as the case may be, and they have to be expressed in a way that can stimulate further discussion and an exchange of viewpoints.Im a member here and I can voice my opinons. Why would I want to go to a place were 100% of the people are like minded? Variety is good. Plus there are some here thay feel the way I do. I also don't believe my negativity is unfounded.
I'll grant you that's uncertain. But, it doesn't make it any better that they ALL require a manufactured conflict they could win for their own survival. Either they mostly knew it was fake and needed the pandering to make the right choice OR they thought it was real (except maybe the top guy) and that manipulated them into make the right choice. Either way it undercuts the message that they're a diverse, complex, intelligent species.Other than their leader that Ake spoke with, how many Klingons actually know this was a setup? I gather that this was not shared with anyone except the High Council, and the conflict was purposely manufactured by both sides.
Interesting you should say that. My wife and I were just remarking how cheap and cartoonish the series looks. Not all the times but when there is a lot of CGI it is definitely subpar. The physical stages look great though.
All of them? The Klingon weapons were set to minimum power which would have taken a purposeful act on the part of those in command of the ships.Other than their leader that Ake spoke with, how many Klingons actually know this was a setup? I gather that this was not shared with anyone except the High Council, and the conflict was purposely manufactured by both sides.
I'll grant you that's often the case. I just thought they were trying to not do that here. And it seemed so obvious too. But you're right that it is consistent with a lot of the monolithic portrayals of alien cultures.Isn't that baked in to most Star Trek species? They are all kind of one stereotype that needs one thing in order for them to continue as a planet/race/species.
It's also consistent with all too many real life issues. Things are treated as massive opinions, rather than nuanced.I'll grant you that's often the case. I just thought they were trying to not do that here. And it seemed so obvious too. But you're right that it is consistent with a lot of the monolithic portrayals of alien cultures.
Could we not spend many days discussing Star Trek plots that are a little silly if you think too much about them?Ok, I can respect that view. I can see that for other types of situations, such as the one you described.
I still think having the entire species require that pandering for their own survival is . . . silly.
I'd agree with that. The difference is that in the show, the Klingons reacted as if they were a single, consistent culture with no variation. In the real world, if you treat a group that way and they are actually diverse, you won't get the results you expect.It's also consistent with all too many real life issues. Things are treated as massive opinions, rather than nuanced.
That's why this BBS exists! And it has been around for a LONG time. So, you're right!Could we not spend many days discussing Star Trek plots that are a little silly if you think too much about them?
Yes, it is very common in fiction. Especially in Star Trek.I'd agree with that. The difference is that in the show, the Klingons reacted as if they were a single, consistent culture with no variation. In the real world, if you treat a group that way and they are actually diverse, you won't get the results you expect.
So, through the unified Klingon reactions, the writers basically confirmed the Klingons were that single culture. One that is easily deceived and/or manipulated. It wasn't just that the characters thought they were one-dimensional stereotypes. The Klingons actually acted that way.
It has endured for 2000 years and will continue to endure long after paramount plus has crumbled into dust.That's why this BBS exists! And it has been around for a LONG time. So, you're right!
So, what are you saying? It's NOT ok to be annoyed by juvenile characters. That we're forced to like them?! Interesting.You just shot yourself in the foot with that comment.
It is, just a TV show.
I wasn't trying. Your original "joke" about "a list of words" was so dumb that it's not worth the effort. Do better. At least try to make sense.Another 1. But keep trying.
There's a whole sequence all about that angst.I swear to Rod, it’s like no one has ever seen a film or tv about the military or college before SFA. Look at For All Mankind. The characters are adults and part of an elite group of veteran military pilots yet are involved with reckless, petty and juvenile antics with angst filled private lives. Top Gun’s hero is fits that as well.
Most folks who find a thing as apparently annoying to view as you've been describing, usually move on to watch something else that doesn't ring that bell and they find enjoyable.So, what are you saying? It's NOT ok to be annoyed by juvenile characters. That we're forced to like them?! Interesting.
I guess whatever floats your boat. You like 'em, you got 'em! Enjoy!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.