Indeed. (I needed to censor the word and it works because the Gorn are such a weirdly attractive group of species).They're so well-suited to it...
Image by Odd The Sun God.
Indeed. (I needed to censor the word and it works because the Gorn are such a weirdly attractive group of species).They're so well-suited to it...
Isn't that the same scene where Kirk is gifted reading glasses. Something that really should not exist in the future if you are to go by the picky standards of some.Exactly. You don't want things (and people) to get so "evolved" and "futuristic" and "utopian" that we can't relate to the characters.
So, Kirk drinks coffee and eats chicken sandwichs and gripes when McCoy tells him to eat more salads, etc. And people occasionally swear and squabble and lose their tempers, and college kids are sometimes immature and make bad decisions . . . .
Back twenty years ago, Voyager and Enterprise were indeed hated amongst fandom as much as the Kurtzman shows are now. "Breaking canon" was one of the most common complaints people made about Enterprise back in the day. Even Voyager got some vitriol over ignoring what the other shows established, particularly Dark Frontier and stuff about the Borg.None of those shows broke Canon as badly. Also none were hated as much as any Kurtzman Trek.
In between episodes of course. Does the rest of the world make TV shows about the characters studying???? Just students listening to Teachers and taking notes?Yeah, and the rest of the world when see those American shows is like "When these people study?!?"![]()
In between episodes of course. Does the rest of the world make TV shows about the characters studying???? Just students listening to Teachers and taking notes?
“Bro” what are you even talking about? I haven’t asked you what you like or dislike. And I’ve seen all Trek from “Encounter at Farpoint” on first run so don’t make presumptions about me either, please and thank you.Bro you're talking to someone who watched first run Voyager as a teenager, loved it and spent literal hours defending it online. So don't presume to make assumptions about what I like or dislike.
Yeah, I was one of those in those discussions and haven’t forgotten them. Nor do I give those shows a pass just because (come to a Zoom, we can talk about it) or do I attack current shows for the same. I rather liked DSC s1, and Pike on DSC has for me been him at his best. I loved PRO. I wish we could have gotten 7 years of the PIC s1 universe and of course LEG. Plus there are things in all the current series I like, including in SFA. Be that all as it may, it doesn’t change anything.I'm not attacking anything, but stating facts that none of the series are perfect and some that are now considered 'classic' had glaring flaws. Like I said. I am old enough to remember how hostile the fanbase were to Enterprise, how maligned Voyager was and the constant comparisons between TNG and DS9. I also remember the continual calls for Rick Berman and Brannon Braga to be replaced.
Nah, I disagree. And I’m not the only one.The arguments being made against new trek are the exact same as the ones that were being made towards 90's trek. It's just the same shit repeated ad nauseum. I have my criticisms of each series, but I also genuinely enjoy them all and I don't understand the need to tear down the latest franchise offering because of some arbitrary, inconsistent and down right hypocritical set of criteria.
Absolutely. Hearing how interesting characters became the way they are? Fine. Spending hours of watching them to get there? Not so much.Starfleet officers waxing nostalgic about their rowdy Academy days, and the antics they got into
I love TNG "Tapestry". For one episode, that's great. But I wouldn't watch an entire series based on that.
Transporter phasers existed in TNG with.. The Gambit? (Picard on the pirate ship)
There is just so much not to like about this episode.
I will say that the phasers being set to transport was cool, though we have seen this in the past. (As far back as TNG's "Gambit" two-parter.)
Sudden loss of trade might affect the availability of rare materials and specialty manufacturing required for common machines and appliances to exist - the same as it would, and does, in the real world. Then you either can't make the gadgets, have to innovate new designs where possible, or make compromises in function and reliability.The burn just affected dilithium. That wouldn't affect replicator technology.
In between episodes of course. Does the rest of the world make TV shows about the characters studying???? Just students listening to Teachers and taking notes?
This could have inspired the coinage of "Touch grass." Not that it did...Got a laugh out of this comment in that thread:
![]()
What is "the overall structure of Star Trek," though? Does DS9 fit it? Does Lower Decks fit it? How about Picard? All of those would seem to deviate from the norm of previous Star Trek series in some way.I think the fact that this show is a youth show, a young adult show, doesn't fit the overall structure of Star Trek.
He's been voicing the campus computer in all three episodes so far. He's a main cast member in the opening credits and even gets a special "with" credit.Is Stephen Colbert being used for just this one episode or is he cast as the Digital Dean?
Pretty sure he's been in every episode so far.Is Stephen Colbert being used for just this one episode or is he cast as the Digital Dean?
Hijinks will ensue.Anxiety around exams is a big part of youth drama!
You will now pay the penance of being forced to watch every upcoming episode of the show and noticing him every single time.Wow I totally missed that until this episode!
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.