• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek Rotten Tomatoes Rating

I think the marketing of this film has been a masterstroke. The way they set up the prescreenings, the worldwide tour, the Kuwait visit, the Austin premier, has generated enormous goodwill towards this production. The casting was a stroke of genius too. All the movie stars are in non-recurring roles. I imagine they will follow the same template for the sequel. At the same time, the cast and crew of this film have expressed enormous respect for all that has preceded them. Yes, you can point to the decidedly ungeeky proclamations that certain cast or crew haven't ever watched Star Trek. Elijah Wood evidently never read LOTR. At the same time, there are an equal, if not greater, number of cast and crew who were Trek fans all along. There's a balance between the old and the new. Also, for all the fretting over Abrams "for future fans of Star Trek" line, that's the truth, any successful Star Trek film is for future fans of Star Trek, because the existing ones are either getting older or don't have the numbers to sustain a successful franchise. Star Trek needs to be new. It needs to be relevant to young people today. Part of that relevance is going to come from forgetting what you already know about Star Trek. A case in point: Leno deriding Trek fans as pathetic losers who could only get a date with a blowup doll in his segment on the trek cologne. That attitude has to change, and Abrams and Paramount are doing their damndest to change it. I support them fully. I hope they pull it off. Appeal to new fans will appeal to critics. Goodwill towards new and existing Trek fans generates positive momentum, good reviews, and ultimately big box office numbers, which is what it's all about in the end. Make a profitable movie and have fun doing it. It seems they've accomplished the latter goal. I suspect they'll make a lot of money too.
 
You are just part of a sad minority of Trek fans.
Even in this very forum various polls have shown that about 95 % of people intend to see the movie. And most of them have no concerns about its direction.

You're ignoring the fact that many peple who participate in such polls happen to be studio plants. j/k ;)

Dude...we are trying to keep it a secret. ;)

By the way all those people writing positive reviews after seeing the movie are plants too.
But have no fear. Inevitably, a negative review will come. And will be hailed by all as the only true and unbiased one.:shifty:
 
But have no fear. Inevitably, a negative review will come. And will be hailed by all as the only true and unbiased one.:shifty:

The review will open thus: "The latest in a line of reboots, Star Trek opens with a shot of the Kelvin, except now it's all wrong. This ship only has one nacelle and a registration number that starts with a zero instead of another numeral. It only gets worse from there."
 
You are just part of a sad minority of Trek fans.
Even in this very forum various polls have shown that about 95 % of people intend to see the movie. And most of them have no concerns about its direction.

And allow me to doubt how many of you who claim that you will not see it, will actually do it.
If for nothing else, so that you will be able to come here and whine about every little detail that contradicts whatever fan fiction you've been building in your heads for decades.

Paramount may actually make MORE money off of them than the rest of us. They'll probably go see it several times in order to record every single detail they don't like so they can fulfill their own prophecies!
 
I can't believe people are still trying to compare Trek and Watchmen. They couldn't be more different really. And no, the reviews for Watchmen weren't all positive initially. They were very mixed from the beginning and RT number was never very high.
 
I can't believe people are still trying to compare Trek and Watchmen. They couldn't be more different really. And no, the reviews for Watchmen weren't all positive initially. They were very mixed from the beginning and RT number was never very high.

Indeed. That was a real struggle to adapt a series that its creator described as "unfilmable", and the reviews were a pretty clear warning to casual viewers.

This is deliberately made and marketed for the masses.
 
We are very pleased.

:D

Wasn't this movie supposed to be universally panned by Trekkies and layman alike? Isn't it supposed to bomb - what with the raping of childhood and all.

The nacelles are too big people! THIS CANNOT STAND! TEA PARTY!!!!!
 
Trek's Competition
Wolverine May 1: Comes out the week before Trek. Has had a lot of bad buzz, and it leaked which has already been downloaded over a million times. WOM is mixed at best. Anyway should Open from $60-$90. Trek is going to crush this film.

Excuse my ignorance, but what does WOM stand for?

The only acronym that occurs to me is "World of Movies", or something.. :/
 
Trek's Competition
Wolverine May 1: Comes out the week before Trek. Has had a lot of bad buzz, and it leaked which has already been downloaded over a million times. WOM is mixed at best. Anyway should Open from $60-$90. Trek is going to crush this film.

Excuse my ignorance, but what does WOM stand for?

The only acronym that occurs to me is "World of Movies", or something.. :/

word of mouth?
It is indeed "word of mouth".
 
The newest review, from Dark Horizons, is rather cautiously positive. It sums up by saying it's a good film, but points out a lot of problems on the way.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top