Yes, yes it was. I just anticipated someone taking me too seriously.I also think someone will eventually buy it and show it. But what I don't see is that someone making more episodes of it.
Which means sarcasm was not remotely your intent.
Yes, yes it was. I just anticipated someone taking me too seriously.I also think someone will eventually buy it and show it. But what I don't see is that someone making more episodes of it.
Which means sarcasm was not remotely your intent.
Well, as much as I wish I were, I'm not actually currently in a position to buy Prodigy. So it doesn't really matter if I pass the responsibility on to someone else or not.Eh, 99% of the time when I've read or heard something like "I'm sure someone will do it" without specifying any realistic specfic person/group, the end result ends up being no one actually does it (because everyone thinks someone else will do it, ergo no one does it).
Hi Tim Cook, nice to see you on here, don't worry we won't tell anyone else who you really are. And by the way, you should tell the Foundation tv show folks to actually follow the books, otherwise you might get a riot like Netflix's Witcher. And the Apple TV needs a wired private listening option like Roku has.Well, as much as I wish I were, I'm not actually currently in a position to buy Prodigy. So it doesn't really matter if I pass the responsibility on to someone else or not.
Maybe we start an LLC.Well, as much as I wish I were, I'm not actually currently in a position to buy Prodigy. So it doesn't really matter if I pass the responsibility on to someone else or not.
Damn, was it that obvious? Well, I may as well tell you that Apple is going to buy Paramount soon. Look forward to iOS being replaced with LCARS.Hi Tim Cook, nice to see you on here, don't worry we won't tell anyone else who you really are. And by the way, you should tell the Foundation tv show folks to actually follow the books, otherwise you might get a riot like Witcher's Netflix. And the Apple TV needs a wired private listening option like Roku has.
![]()
![]()
Just says available to buy, no date.
I would suggest starting with ICARS then work your way up to L.Damn, was it that obvious? Well, I may as well tell you that Apple is going to buy Paramount soon. Look forward to iOS being replaced with LCARS.
40 episodes will be all we'll get. Who knows when we'll see #21-#40. All we can do is keep our fingers crossed and hope this whole thing doesn't fall apart and the series ends with a cliffhanger that never gets resolved.
I suspect there's more to this story. At least looking over the CTV Sci-Fi content my cable service provides On Demand all their shows (Star Trek and non-Trek) are all listed as being removed July 19, even SNW. Though this could be one of their weird "forms must be obeyed" type of things and many of those shows will be back almost right away. They've been doing that all year with the series The Ark, where each time we get to the date listed as when it'll be pulled from On Demand, it's back the next day with a new date listed for when it will be pulled.Anyways turns out I was wrong, sometime in July cravetv is losing all the Star Treks except SNWs according what folks on this sight. So official the only things left worth watching on Cravetv will be SNWs as well as Corner Gas & Republic of Doyle reruns.
RIP CTV SCI/CRAVETV.
I really don't think this logic applies to business decisions like whether or not to buy a property from an external provider to broadcast/stream. You think Netflix will go "oh, Amazon will probably buy it, so we don't need to"?Eh, 99% of the time when I've read or heard something like "I'm sure someone will do it" without specifying any realistic specfic person/group, the end result ends up being no one actually does it (because everyone thinks someone else will do it, ergo no one does it).
I suspect there's more to this story. At least looking over the CTV Sci-Fi content my cable service provides On Demand all their shows (Star Trek and non-Trek) are all listed as being removed July 19, even SNW. Though this could be one of their weird "forms must be obeyed" type of things and many of those shows will be back almost right away. They've been doing that all year with the series The Ark, where each time we get to the date listed as when it'll be pulled from On Demand, it's back the next day with a new date listed for when it will be pulled.
Perhaps it's a glitch in their system?
If anything, that would just make them want it more.I really don't think this logic applies to business decisions like whether or not to buy a property from an external provider to broadcast/stream. You think Netflix will go "oh, Amazon will probably buy it, so we don't need to"?
Only because I wasn't there.
I was sort of expecting the series to have an abbreviated run. I would have been delighted to be wrong.
Where you saw the past, I saw progress. TNG regularly has women and POC in command roles, both as ship captains and admirals, and it tried to address LGBTQ issues allegorically. DS9 had a POC and a woman in command roles, and addressed same-sex romance far more directly. Voyager also had a woman and POC in command roles, and as for not continuing with LGBTQ matters, well... consider the showrunners.
I suspect there's more to this story. At least looking over the CTV Sci-Fi content my cable service provides On Demand all their shows (Star Trek and non-Trek) are all listed as being removed July 19, even SNW. Though this could be one of their weird "forms must be obeyed" type of things and many of those shows will be back almost right away. They've been doing that all year with the series The Ark, where each time we get to the date listed as when it'll be pulled from On Demand, it's back the next day with a new date listed for when it will be pulled.
Given Bell has made no formal announcement about losing Star Trek, that seems very likely.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.