• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 3x10 - "The Last Generation"

Engage!


  • Total voters
    397
If you're refering to the glimpse of a Connie engineering section seen in Best of Both Worlds part II, I wouldn't say it's definitely a Constitution class. We only see it for a second and only a part of the ship. I consider most of the wreckage in that episode to be best left unidentified.
Yeah I am. I haven't read that Ex Astris article in ages. I can't recall how definitive it was. Wolf 359 was a graveyard of AMT models.
 
We only know that the Enterprise was launched in 2245 and that there were "12 like her in the fleet", according to Kirk in TOS. For all we know, that could simply mean there were only 12 Connie's outfitted like the Enterprise, as I'm sure they made more then only 12.
There's no reason for such a liberal interpretation of "like her". It's clear that he meant there were 13 at the time of the episode. They might've made more afterwards, though we never saw another one after TOS, except the 1701-A.
 
Honestly, with all the Sovereign classes in the fleet we saw, there would have been no need to retire the E even.
Just upgrade it, refresh it's infrastructure with replicators and transporters, and keep it running for another 100 odd years.
This frequent change in ships (for no good reason) just doesn't make sense in-universe wise.

I thought it was pretty much stated canon that she was smashed into a 1000 pieces? Just do not blame Worf.
 
Which is why I am surprised they got away with Q. John de Lancie was not paid for Episode 10. He was paid for season 2, and Terry Metalas asked if he could have 20 minutes to quickly shot a scene for season 3, which De Lancie agreed to do. Perhaps pushing that scene into the end credits makes a legal difference.
I can't imagine they didn't pay him. They probably had to pay him scale for a cameo. Not paying him would get both him and the studio into trouble with the guild. And Matalas and Kurtzman too. I read the AMA and Matalas said he had no money, but he could have not been literal in that.

One possibility is that Season 2 and 3 actually had a combined budget since it was shot back to back and counted as one production, so Lancie's labor was paid for via his Season 2 compensation. This happened in some multipart films, but I'm not sure for TV. Who knows though.
 
-_-

Yorktown is the least "not canon" thing in the history of Star Trek canon. It was Gene's idea. It was producer intent. Essentially every piece of licensed work ever that dealt with the Enterprise-A's history, mentioned it.

All that's missing is one dumb throwaway line.

Regardless "Yorktown" itself is a historic name, and "Sao Paulo" is one of Latin America's great cities (and imagine what it's like in the 24th century). Honoring a vibrant city got pushed aside to rename it Defiant, which is named after a ship that vanished in the 23rd century, and a ship that got blasted to hell 6 weeks earlier in Chintoka.

EIther way you cut it, this "nuhhh it should be the TItan" shit is literally the worst of Star Trek, where the "rules" are arbitrary and selectively ignore precedent because fans don't like the decision and more than that, they want to straight jacket the story for some reason.

The payoff in that moment, at that first viewing, of finding out the entire season had been the Enterprise-G's origin story, is so much richer than just being introduced to some random fucking ship. Because now it means every repeat viewing of the season is flavored by "this is destined to be the 1701-G", and that's a lovely way to rewatch the series.

You simply do not have that if they dumped a new ship on us. What's gained? Servicing some abstraction of not "dissing" the Titan name? Nonsense. Trek fans have a 50 year habit of pushing aside storytelling with nonsense, but this is really apotheosis of it.

The fandom really has a history of certain arbitrarily determined memetic axioms that take root and never seem to go away. You can say this is the definition of fandom, especially among those motivated to have extended discussions in a forum like this. One other example is the vocal minority of fans who still insist DSC and SNW aren’t in the prime universe because of reasons….
 
I can't imagine they didn't pay him. They probably had to pay him scale for a cameo. Not paying him would get both him and the studio into trouble with the guild. And Matalas and Kurtzman too. I read the AMA and Matalas said he had no money, but he could have not been literal in that.

One possibility is that Season 2 and 3 actually had a combined budget since it was shot back to back and counted as one production, so Lancie's labor was paid for via his Season 2 compensation. This happened in some multipart films, but I'm not sure for TV. Who knows though.
There are probably work arounds agreeable to all parties.
 
That was pretty dumb but super thankful no one else died. For a second it felt like they were going to kill JLP. Seems like the setup to a new series? No doubt it will be written and directed and tied up neatly with a little bow by Matalas. I would have preferred a seven/shaw series setup but, wtf do I know?

Very few thoughts:

"if earth falls, everything falls" clearly Earth is a US-style hegemonic power in the Federation.

Is there some reason they didn't flood the transporter room with anaesthezine gas or trap the baby borgies on the pad with a force field? Terry loves plot holes...
 
I thought it was pretty much stated canon that she was smashed into a 1000 pieces? Just do not blame Worf.
I want a Lower Decks scene of Worf ramming his ship into another Reman ship trying to outdo Picard and then he brings the ruin of a ship back to Spacedock and Picard sees it and he's like "Not again! What have I told you about firing first and asking questions later?"
"Admiral if I may.. We ran out of torpedoes."
 
I can't imagine they didn't pay him. They probably had to pay him scale for a cameo. Not paying him would get both him and the studio into trouble with the guild. And Matalas and Kurtzman too. I read the AMA and Matalas said he had no money, but he could have not been literal in that.

One possibility is that Season 2 and 3 actually had a combined budget since it was shot back to back and counted as one production, so Lancie's labor was paid for via his Season 2 compensation. This happened in some multipart films, but I'm not sure for TV. Who knows though.

It could be. I did notice that John de Lancie was not credited for Episode 10. Reading that interview Metalas gave, I did wonder if that made Paramount uncomfortable, and John de Lancie's agent furious.
 
The F being decommissioned has something to do with a fault in its computer system according to those Instagram logs. Not because of its age.
My head canon reason is that, rather than refit the computer system, Starfleet completed the several ships of that size in the 2380s as kind of a "sunk cost" follow up to the Galaxy-Intrepid lineage that migrated in some Sovereign tech, but as part of the lessons learned review from the Dominion War decided that it was the 23rd century mid-sized "modular built" ships that allowed them to have a large, sustainable fleet. Therefore in the 2390s they shifted back to mid-sized ships (still larger than most 23rd century ships) that shared common parts in different configurations.

There is real world precedent for this. The US Navy's Zumwalt class of destroyer is the largest ever built and was supposed to see 30 ships. But they were too big, too hard to build, and too much of a technological outlier, so they curtailed it to 3 ships, and resumed upgraded versions of it's predecessor class. The next class will take the Zumwalt tech, modernized, and put it in an easier-to-build hull.

The Connie-III, Sagan, Duderstadt, Echelon and maybe the Excelsior II all share common parts. Even with Replicators, building starships still takes substantial work hours, and through real world modular construction you could build a lot of those classes of ships by combining independently built parts, in the time it would take you to build a single Enterprise-F type inside-out. And on top of that, upgrades you make to "Connie-III, Sagan, Duderstadt, Echelon" "family of classes" couple probably be applied to all of them, whereas it would need modification to be back integrated into older ships of unique designs.

This is, incidentally, something the US Navy is going through right now because it wants to get rid of all the 1980s Los Angeles-class subs ASAP, despite some of them having years of life left, to go to an all-Virginia-class fleet because it'll take less work and be faster, to support one large attack sub class, and not two (putting the 3 class special mission Seawolfs aside).

Again this is all head canon, but applying real world reasoning to the seeming early retirement of the Enterprise-F has it make all the sense in the world. It would be incidentally the same reason that the Galaxy class is gone. But in keeping the Sovereigns an the "Battle of Sector 001" era ships around, despite their more integrated designs than the 2390s/2400 designs, they too share a common set of technologies. Galaxy/Nebula and Enterprise-F type really seem like outliers.
 
You new here? IT MATTERS!!!!!!!! ;)
Books are fun. During the interregnums, they were all we had. But they can be rendered irrelevant at a keystroke.
You say that but if you go to the Discovery threads and say this doesn’t match with continuity, you get attacked by people saying it doesn’t matter.
You can’t have it both ways.
 
There's no reason for such a liberal interpretation of "like her". It's clear that he meant there were 13 at the time of the episode. They might've made more afterwards, though we never saw another one after TOS, except the 1701-A.

There was a Constitution class ship at Wolf 359, they used the Enterprises blown up saucer from Star Trek 3.
 
Why is it whenever the show writers don’t address every possible contingency and what-if scenario it suddenly becomes a plot hole??

“I really wanted Italian food for dinner but nothing was available”

“wait you could have gotten Chef Boyardee!! Fucking plot holes”
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top