It works easiest if you just say that Q moved them to a completely alternate timeline. Which is simplistic but also accurate.I am not sure I buy the whole explanation of why Guinan does not recognize Picard.
It works easiest if you just say that Q moved them to a completely alternate timeline. Which is simplistic but also accurate.I am not sure I buy the whole explanation of why Guinan does not recognize Picard.
Alternate timeline would explain some of the inconsistencies I have with the 2024 stuff. I doubt it thoughIt works easiest if you just say that Q moved them to a completely alternate timeline. Which is simplistic but also accurate.
Cris: The cigars are free and make me feel better.Guinan: So Cris, let's just for the moment assume that what you're saying is indeed true, and that you have indeed somehow recently arrived from a future where money does not exist and everyone works to better themselves. How do you explain having developed an obvious addiction to cigars in the future that you describe?
Where? This thread?So these Aegis members won’t remember Kirk if they keep with the time travel rules they established here
By the showrunner.Where? This thread?
Were you born here in the USA, or in Iran?Persian American. Half anyway. My father came here in the '70s.
I'm still not getting it.
As of 2024, both the Federation and Confederation timelines are possible futures. Therefore, characters from either timeline should be able to travel back to a point before the divergence - and even meet each other. I see no reason why this shouldn't be able to happen. For example, even though Picard and crew are now from the Confederation timeline, they will still meet Sisko and the DS9 crew if they stick around long enough, because the Federation timeline is still a possible future.
Also, the Guinan from "Watcher" should still have met Picard in the 1800's, because again, the Federation is still a possible future.
The divergence has not happened yet, so logically speaking, one timeline shouldn't be "dominant" over another. There ARE no separate timelines at this point.
I'm still not getting it.
As of 2024, both the Federation and Confederation timelines are possible futures. Therefore, characters from either timeline should be able to travel back to a point before the divergence - and even meet each other. I see no reason why this shouldn't be able to happen. For example, even though Picard and crew are now from the Confederation timeline, they will still meet Sisko and the DS9 crew if they stick around long enough, because the Federation timeline is still a possible future.
Also, the Guinan from "Watcher" should still have met Picard in the 1800's, because again, the Federation is still a possible future.
The divergence has not happened yet, so logically speaking, one timeline shouldn't be "dominant" over another. There ARE no separate timelines at this point.
I would kind of agree with your points because it's reasonable to assume that the normal timeline will be restored. So, if it's restored in 3 days, that means that the normal timeline exists forward beyond that point, which means they can travel back to the past from the normal timeline.I'm still not getting it.
As of 2024, both the Federation and Confederation timelines are possible futures. Therefore, characters from either timeline should be able to travel back to a point before the divergence - and even meet each other. I see no reason why this shouldn't be able to happen. For example, even though Picard and crew are now from the Confederation timeline, they will still meet Sisko and the DS9 crew if they stick around long enough, because the Federation timeline is still a possible future.
Also, the Guinan from "Watcher" should still have met Picard in the 1800's, because again, the Federation is still a possible future.
The divergence has not happened yet, so logically speaking, one timeline shouldn't be "dominant" over another. There ARE no separate timelines at this point.
The Confederation timeline overwrote the Federation timeline, including all the time travel stories from that timeline.If the 2024 divergence has already happened, then it's too late, isn't it? Nothing the crew does could possibly make any difference.
The Confederation timeline overwrote the federation timeline.
Her odd eyes and lips are the opposite of hot to me, but attraction is very subjective of course.Personally, I like the recasting and I mean no offense or disparagement or anything in saying this but as a straight male viewer I find Ito's Guinan a lot "hotter" than Whoopi's (sorry Whoopi). I want to see Ito's Guinan in Strange New Worlds fighting the Borg or something.
This whole thread is a qagh festivalthat’s a whole new can of worms probably best avoided for now
19th century Guinan and 24th century Guinan look a lot more similar than either compared to this new 21st century Guinan. Whoopi's face didn't change a lot at all. I at least don't see any typical signs of aging like wrinkles. NewGuinan's eye rings actually make her look older in my viewWhy? She is younger here. Also the actress is the same age Whoopi was when she started on TNG.
Why would they?The recasting of Guinan allows her to appear in Strange New Worlds as much as they want if they want to take that option. What you suggest doesn't have this option.
Only if the 2024 divergence has already happened. In which case, this whole series is pointless.
If it has NOT happened - which seems to be the intention, since the crew seems to think that there's a point to what they're doing - then logically the Federation timeline has NOT been overwritten, because neither timeline exists yet!
They've gone back in time to change the timeline back to the federation timeline.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.