I hate pedantic debates.
No you don't, you despise them, there's a difference.
I hate pedantic debates.
That it's a slow traffic day and this discussion is the only thing right now that keeps this thread going?Am I missing anything?
Yup, time to move on.That it's a slow traffic day and this discussion is the only thing right now that keeps this thread going?
I guess, if he would look through his feet instead of a veil, maybe things would be clearerYup, time to move on.
I guess there's no sense in attempting to converse with a fustian pontificator who only sees things through a thick veil of animosity.
![]()
believe me, I know it's not the majority.
Also, believe me, it's not the worst fandom out there.
Take a look at the big message boards for Doctor Who for instance. 50% of the participants on those boards just post to tell how the show has lost it's way and isn't as good as it was since circa November 1963
nope, he certaimly isn'tYes.
It has many uses and many definitions. I am using it very consistently and with a definition that I have made clear.
That seems pretty unlikely - A warlord running a sector in Federation space? Regardless of how the Federation feels about the romuleans - I cannot see that.
It is more likely that given what we know about upcoming episodes that it is just beyond the federation border.
Just like there is no on-screen evidence of a USS Verity (unless I missed it) - I would ignore this unless something on screen confirms it.
And some think they do, but really aren't aware of what that actually entails. Continually attempting to adapt it to their faulty reasoning.
No. Still just you.nope, he certaimly isn't
No there really isn't any other meaning for a 'Mary Sue' other than it being a writer placing themselves into a story. Considering how many people hate Picard, he isn't a Mary Sue. Nobody hates the Mary Sue in a story. Also, even if a 'Moral Mary Sue' was actually a thing, I don't think it really applies to Picard considering he made an immoral choice of choosing his pride and hubris over saving Romulan lives.
I dont even know what that means.you need new feet (© @Hythlodeus)
i really thought you were following this threadI dont even know what that means.
No, there are many meanings, and have been for years. And he never chose anything over saving Romulan lives. That's just it. Everyone but him is responsible for this. He did not cause the supernova, he did not cause the synth attack, he did not ban the syths, and he sacrificed his career to continue the Romulan rescue effort. He never chose anything over that.
then put on your reading feet and try reading that post again. It seems clear to me.I dont even know what that means.
s/he might have you on igno, thoughthen put on your reading feet and try reading that post again. It seems clear to me.
Am I missing something? The entire point of the show is that he did not continue it! The moment Starfleet pulled the rug out of him, he literally gave up and retired to Burgundy for fourteen years. He could've called in the hundreds of favors he'd collected during his captaincy, but he did nothing. He was a personal friend to Sarek and Spock and never asked the Vulcans for help. He was the Arbiter of Succession to the Klingon Empire, and the former Federation ambassador to Qo'noS was his former subordinate, but he never went to the Klingons for help. He could've asked the merchant fleets for assistance, but he didn't do any of that. Even if he couldn't muster any help, he could've at least gone back to Vashti and help the refugees there including Elnor who looked up to him as a father figure, but he instead chose to cut himself off from the entire galaxy and went to sulk in his family home for fourteen years.he sacrificed his career to continue the Romulan rescue effort
No, he is the Executive Producer of ST Picard. Were you actually unaware of that? Apparently some are.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.