Fair enough. Again, a lot depends on whether the criticism actually compares it to the earlier shows or not.
If you want to say, "the science in that episode was sloppy," that's a perfectly valid criticism that, yes, doesn't require you to acknowledge every bit of sloppy science in every previous STAR TREK project.
But if you say "DISCO is way more sloppy about science than classic Trek," then you're inviting comparisons and counter-examples.
Then again, if you want to argue that we
should hold DISCO to a higher standard than previous Treks . . . well, yeah, that's where things get interesting when it comes to comparisons. It's not a double standard, I admit, if someone admits up front that they're holding DISCO to a higher standard because it's 2019 and TV is more sophisticated these days.
As opposed to insisting that the "STAR TREK never did THAT in the good old days" . . . aside from the seventeen times they did.