• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 1x13 - "What's Past Is Prologue"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    288
It depends on the extent. If it’s minor, then they might keep it but I think this is supposed to be the Federation on its last legs and I don’t think that will stick.

Which is why I suggested we wait and see what actually happens before we get out of sorts!
 
Okay, having finished the entire episode, I like it a bit better. I still think it was very flawed, and I'm rating it worse than the rest of the MU episodes (6/10) as a result.

The good about the episode was basically the visual elements. The ship shots seemed better than in past episodes, and the fight choreography was excellent - action movie level. I liked the twist of Georgiou surviving, which was unexpected. I liked the ending scenes of Stamets navigating the network as well.

Unfortunately, the dialogue and plotting was action movie level dumb as well. This is Trek for people with double-digit IQs. Lorca's character had zero complexity - he was just a dumb MU heavy who was destroyed for nothing. All of the characters had dialogue which was just too on the nose, with tons of exposition and/or technobabble as the plot needed. As I mentioned, the added stakes of the entire multiverse being destroyed made no sense - if all someone needed to do is construct a big ship powered by the mycelial network, it would have been destroyed billions of years in the past, given we're talking about an infinite number of universes. And the ending scene where the "battle lines" updated without any word from the federation was just eye-rollingly dumb.

The worst by far however is given it appears that the Klingon War might have been lost by the Federation (unclear based upon the trailer, as others have noted) we might be heading for a reset/time travel episode. This potentially means that the entire season was for nothing, and they might just do a mulligan.
 
Last edited:
Amusingly he was a villain, and not even a very good or memorable villain sadly. I knew he'd be defeated and killed so unceremoniously, in the interest of elevating other characters.

Yep, Lorca reminds me a Bond villain. He boasts a lot but in the end, gets defeated pretty easily by the hero. Burnham's plan of pretending to bring Georgiou to him, is a pretty standard hero plan and Lorca fell for it hook line and sinker.
 
They to find a way to rescue Prime Lorca. Jason Isaacs was the only one keeping the show together.

You are dreaming in technocolour.

I'm certain Isaacs will appear in Season 2. He will. As a guest spot and a surprise twist. That's what these modern serialized shows always do with characters who are written off. I don't think Isaacs will get an important role anymore at this point.

It would overshadow Mary-Sue Burnham. We're inching closer and closer to 'Captain Burnham'
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top