Watched this a week ago in 4k. It not only holds up I think it's a very good "Star Trek" movie and good "scifi" movie.Just rewatched this last night. Still my third favourite of the Kelvinverse films but it rose in my estimation. It also made me want more from this particular cast (and sad Anton Yelchin is gone).
Why?that I didn't have a major problem with. 2009 pissed me off with making Kirk a captain while still on academic probation.
Sad but fair.I heard all of the arguments defending it in 2009. I had all those discussions then and I'm not gonna derail the thread with them now, especially since that was just the tiniest part of my post. But you asked so there you go.
And also why a seemingly disgraced Scotty sneaks on board, disobeys a direct order under penalty of court-martial, and then just suddenly becomes an accepted member of the crew.It was the same reason Chekov was suddenly old enough to be there.
What? What court martial?And also why a seemingly disgraced Scotty sneaks on board, disobeys a direct order under penalty of court-martial, and then just suddenly becomes an accepted member of the crew.
However, I get it, you're the director and can do what you want, but your kid's cameo on Yorktown is too obvious and pulls me out of the movie every time.
The little green boy who watches a train go past. It's almost kind of a director trademark at this point, Justin Lin did very similar shots in at least two of the Fast and Furious movies.This is probably my most rewatched Trek movie and I honestly never knew the director's kid even had a cameo on Yorktown.
Was that Sulu's kid? Or someone else?
The little green boy who watches a train go past. It's almost kind of a director trademark at this point, Justin Lin did very similar shots in at least two of the Fast and Furious movies.
It's only one or two seconds of screen time. The train whizzes past, the boy looks at it go, we cut to something else.I honestly don't even remember it off the top of my head.
I hate seeing TFF at the bottom, but 09 and ID belong at the top.
What should I be seeing here? It takes 30 seconds or so to load a "broken image link" icon:
View attachment 39114
and if I try to open that I end up on a PostImage page looking at another broken image link:
View attachment 39113
If I try to open that image, I get this:
View attachment 39115
OK, I can see it now, but wouldn't work for me at all a couple of hours ago. PostImage must have been on lunch break, or something.It's just a screenshot of a ranking program he used to rank the movies.
I think it sets up Kirk's arc in Beyond beautifully.
And he was a lieutenant in 09.
It was not, as his rank was shown on a display during the air drop.think Kirk's arc in Into Darkness (not Beyond) was in response to the criticism of the meteoric rise from cadet/lieutenant (was that clear in the film?)
He did but I needed the see the set up as growth towards that maturing.Anyway, I enjoyed Kirk in Beyond a lot more because he felt like a Starship Captain, the Kirk I always liked watching. Brave, cocky, but plagued with his own inner doubts. The hair was also just right. Pine nailed the character in Beyond. He's the perfect meld of "new" Kirk and OG Kirk.
I would have loved if V had been great! It would have built on IV's success and made TNG even more popular.I hate seeing TFF at the bottom, but 09 and ID belong at the top.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.