• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spidey OUT of MCU

..and all represent the source in ways the MCU could not touch, instead, making Parker "Spider-Lad, The Boy Wonder" to Iron Man

Yes yes yes, we all know how much you hate the idea of Marvel characters interacting with one another and how absolutely everything must be in its own little world no matter what.

--a begging side-kick wannabe with some surrogate daddy issues on the side, but never did we get a sense of the individual Peter Parker and how this kid dealt with operating in the adult world that was not overloaded with fanciful creatures and energy blasts .

We didn't get that from Raimi either, we got some mopey sadsack.
 
That's because there hasn't been a great Spidey film pre MCU. All the live action Spidey films were garbage at best.

I gotta get me some of whatever you're smoking.

No wait, I don't want anything to do with it if that's your reaction. :lol:

Into the Spider-Verse was everything MCU Haters complained the MCU was. But because it had no one but Spidey characters in it somehow that automatically made it good. Hypocrites.

This isn't any more true now than the last time you tried to go with this.
 
I gotta get me some of whatever you're smoking.

No wait, I don't want anything to do with it if that's your reaction. :lol:



This isn't any more true now than the last time you tried to go with this.

True, but he will post anything no matter inaccurate/historically false to defend the overflowing MCU bowl that Spider-Man was drowning in.
 
Far From Home made me care about Tom Holland's Peter in a way that I hadn't before because it used his relationship to/with Tony as a springboard rather than a crutch.
 
Yes yes yes, we all know how much you hate the idea of Marvel characters interacting with one another and how absolutely everything must be in its own little world no matter what.



We didn't get that from Raimi either, we got some mopey sadsack.
Precisely. Toby was an emo dimwit who had the acting range of a walnut.
 
Garfield wasn't perfect, but he was much better than Maguire's. Everytime I think about revisiting the Raimi films and reevaluating my low opinion of them, I remember how awful his and Dunst's performances were in all three. Bleah.
 
A) No. (And I liked Garfield, though in large part because of his chemistry with Emma Stone.)

B) That's... not what emo means.
 
Last edited:
Yes yes yes, we all know how much you hate the idea of Marvel characters interacting with one another and how absolutely everything must be in its own little world no matter what.

You can, and should, have heroes interact without having one be the apprentice or protege of the other. Disliking that kind of relationship doesn't mean you dislike all interactions and want to have none.

We didn't get that from Raimi either, we got some mopey sadsack.

Peter was very mopey, depressed in a lot of the Stan Lee comics.
 
You can, and should, have heroes interact without having one be the apprentice or protege of the other. Disliking that kind of relationship doesn't mean you dislike all interactions and want to have none.

Tell that to X-Men fans (more precisely, FoX-Men fans) who can't stand the idea of mutants existing in a world with non-mutant Supers or Aliens.

Having Spidey be the apprentice to another character is what his relationship to Fury was in Ultimate, I don't recall anyone complaining there. I don't recall anyone complaining about Batman mentoring the Flash in the DCEU.

Peter was very mopey, depressed in a lot of the Stan Lee comics.

And he was also quite cocky and arrogant too. Which Raimi never did.
 
Last edited:
Although historically Spider-Man was notable, even iconic, as the "kid hero that wasn't a sidekick, I think that the PTB needed to change things up this time given that we've already had a triology and a duology (not to mention several cartoons) in the last decade or two with a fairly traditional Spidey so they felt the need to "change things up".

And I think that could have worked.

Unfortunately, a combination of rights issues and a need to have him on "Team Iron Man" in Civil War (for whatever reason) meant that we ended up with the somewhat ill-fitting Tony-Peter partnership, whereas having Steve, Matt Murdock or Reed Richards as Peter's mentor would have worked a lot better as the former has a long history of taking sidekicks/partners and the other two have a long established relationship with Peter in the comics.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top