Yes. Then give him Jordi's visor.Then if DISILLUSION's eye offends me, I should pluck it out, huh?

Yes. Then give him Jordi's visor.Then if DISILLUSION's eye offends me, I should pluck it out, huh?
Because you couldn't handle the truth?^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
And you have to wonder why we didn't ask you?
Offtopic, but is the user name something to do with having lost your faith, or a riff on the way they 'this' in Brooklyn?
Yes sir, that's what I call beautiful. It's good there's such a thing as personal taste, though some it more then others.^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
As opposed to this monstrosity?
Because you couldn't handle the truth?^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
And you have to wonder why we didn't ask you?
Offtopic, but is the user name something to do with having lost your faith, or a riff on the way they 'this' in Brooklyn?
And nope, nothing of the sort. Relic of the days of release groups and such. You TOS people, always trying to read too much into things, even when they're not 'cerebral' in any way.
Yes sir, that's what I call beautiful. It's good there's such a thing as personal taste, though some it more then others.^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
As opposed to this monstrosity?![]()
Would you commit suicide if they decided to destroy it in the next movie?![]()
Would you commit suicide if they decided to destroy it in the next movie?![]()
Of course not, it's not that important. It's just a movie.
Would you commit suicide if they decided to destroy it in the next movie?![]()
Of course not, it's not that important. It's just a movie.
Well, I'm hoping that they do destroy it.![]()
Offtopic, but is the user name something to do with having lost your faith, or a riff on the way they 'this' in Brooklyn?
You TOS people, always trying to read too much into things, even when they're not 'cerebral' in any way.
It was a joke; you could try to laugh, even if you don't get it. Like this ->Oh, love it, just eat this up. That reads about as clever as, 'you darkies can only shuffle your feet along real slow when you're picking cotton, but comes time for dinner, you pick 'em up and move.'
You TOS people, always trying to read too much into things, even when they're not 'cerebral' in any way.
Oh, love it, just eat this up. That reads about as clever as, 'you darkies can only shuffle your feet along real slow when you're picking cotton, but comes time for dinner, you pick 'em up and move.'
^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
As opposed to this monstrosity?
As they say, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
[Hotlinked image removed. - M']
Please host images posted inline on web space belonging to you. See the link to TrekBBS image-posting policy below.^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
As opposed to this monstrosity?
As they say, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
http://popwatch.ew.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/11/11/enterprise579_l.jpg
http://www.fanpop.com/spots/star-trek/images/5346193
[Hotlinked image converted to link. - M']
At 1280 x 1024 and 112.8K, that image is too large to be posted inline, besides which it's hotlinked from Tobias Richter's website, which is a no-no. Please familiarize yourself with TrekkBBS policies concerning the posting of images, so that this does not occur again.
Yes, I liked all those features.
http://www.thelightworks.com/images/pics/ref_illustration/trek_greenhills_wall.jpg
[Oversized and hotlinked image converted to link. - M']
And completely unnecessary and irrelevant to the topic. This is two threads I've seen so far this morning containing jousting between DiSiLLUSiON and trevanian, and I think that's about enough of that. Please stick to the post and not take shots at the poster, guys.You TOS people, always trying to read too much into things, even when they're not 'cerebral' in any way.
Oh, love it, just eat this up. That reads about as clever as, 'you darkies can only shuffle your feet along real slow when you're picking cotton, but comes time for dinner, you pick 'em up and move.'
Your comparison is ludicrous and insulting.
^^ Now that's ugly, if you ask me.
As opposed to this monstrosity?
As they say, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
[Hotlinked image removed. - M']
As much as I love the new ship... I have to admit that's still not the most flattering shot. I think it's just because of it's cropped though.
I remember people photoshopped the entire ship early on (and without the shuttle) and it looked a lot better and more in proportion.
No problem.And completely unnecessary and irrelevant to the topic. This is two threads I've seen so far this morning containing jousting between DiSiLLUSiON and trevanian, and I think that's about enough of that. Please stick to the post and not take shots at the poster, guys.
That depends on personal taste.I've seen pictures where the shuttle has been removed from the shot, and it makes no difference, as you still have a minimal secondary hull, bloated nacelles, etc. The proportions are out of whack, which makes it rather unattractive imo only.
IMO, it IS the most solid look she's ever had.Even though you might not like the lines, I don't think this Enterprise looks flimsy, but rather solidly built.
IMO, it IS the most solid look she's ever had.Even though you might not like the lines, I don't think this Enterprise looks flimsy, but rather solidly built.![]()
I agree. It's solidly ugly.![]()
Larraby, our minds are joining... they are one...Anyways, we have to agree to disagree on this one.
I agree. It's solidly ugly.![]()
Larraby, our minds are joining... they are one...Anyways, we have to agree to disagree on this one.
we...like...the new...Enterprise...we...
appreciate it's design....
![]()
Don't fret, you'll come around.Ha! Ha! You're funny!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.