• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Random Trek "Problems" That Bug You (and that you can't let go!)

Correct me if I’m wrong. Did they not age the Picard character 10 years so that he could be 90 instead of 80 at the beginning of Star Trek Picard. Patrick Stewart was about 47 when TNG aired. That’s a good age to take lead of the flagship. It bugs me.

He played Picard as at around 60 in the first season (+/- 2-3 years).

If that’s true, then I’ve been way off for years. If it’s true, Picard was 51 when his first command; the Star Gazer ended. He commanded Star Gazer for over twenty years? Stewart was born in 1940, making him 47 when they rolled out the show. I suppose I’ve been way off for years. I remember thinking about Picard’s age when I actually turned 47. I hate to say it’s been more than a few years since. Oh well.

On what are you basing that? I see no evidence for him playing Picard as any older than Stewart was at the time.

Jean-Luc Picard was born 15-Jul-2305, making him 59 during the first season of TNG.

The date comes from an onscreen graphic seen in the episode Conundrum as well as the episode Tapestry where he was 22 when he graduated from the Academy in 2327.

Picard would have been 94, or just turned 95 in the first season of Picard set in 2399, depending upon when grape harvest season was set in France.

Patrick Stewart was 79-80 during filming of the first season of Picard.

Picard would have been 96, just shy of 97 in the third season.

If you got with the argument that the third season Picard was supposed to have been set on the 250th Anniversary of the Federation's founding, then the season would have been set in 2411 and Picard would have been 106.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top