• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Pike vs Lorca

Who was better (you define what "better" means to you)?

  • Pike

    Votes: 100 84.0%
  • Lorca

    Votes: 19 16.0%

  • Total voters
    119
Tony imprisoned Wanda, without even telling her. How are his actions there not a problem? Tony brought Peter Parker across international borders and put him to work as a child soldier without a word to his legal guardian. How are his actions there not a problem? Even when he agreed with Cap that Bucky wasn't responsible for his actions, he still tried to murder him. How are his actions there not a problem? Ultron was created by, guess who, Tony. How are his actions there not a problem? Lastly, how many lives did Wanda save by pulling the bomb out of the market? And that's the problem? I'm not saying there was an upside to the accords, even if their should have been safeguards, Tony put himself in a position where he had 100% oversight over the others and ensured there was practically 0% oversight over his actions as we saw, no matter how Tony bungled things, he got to do what he wanted..

Please, the Marvel Movie posts are killing me.

:barf:;):lol:
 
Captain Pike was and remains a proper Starfleet captain; Captain Lorca was an Imperialist pretending to be a patriot and making pretty heavy going of it - put another way, I'd trust Captain Pike with my life AND the future of my civilisation.

I most certainly would not care to entrust either to Captain Lorca ... well, to the Captain Lorca we actually meet; I reserve judgement on the actual non-Mirror Universe Gabriel Lorca.
 
Pike and Lorca were great but the Lorca character was wasted on the MU stuff, he should have just been PU S31 instead who had been to the MU and returned to tell about it.

There is still the potential for a PU Lorca though, the jump to the future screws that up though.

I am really not sold on the time jump at all, I dont really see the value in rehashing Andromeda.
 
Captain Pike was and remains a proper Starfleet captain; Captain Lorca was an Imperialist pretending to be a patriot and making pretty heavy going of it - put another way, I'd trust Captain Pike with my life AND the future of my civilisation.

But Lorca ended up being the more interesting character. Pike mainly came across as generic Starfleet captain #47.
 
I think it would be cool if Prime Lorca was a bigger prick than his Mirror universe counterpart.
I think Lorca was a bigger missed opportunity than Georgiou. I truly wanted him to be like Marcus or Edison from Abrams Trek, a Starfleet officer who suffered from fear and trauma and loss and became a prick to try and survive.
 
From a shallow point of view, Pike. Because he looks SO GOOD. He FLOORED me when he smiled at Tilly on the bridge when he made her think she had "broken" the captain. OMG.

From a not-so-shallow point of view tho... I prefer Lorca. NOT the mustache-twirling villain they turned him into at the end, of course, no - I liked him as a captain because he was so refreshingly different than all the other captains we had seen before while Pike was just "same old, same old' again.
 
He definitely had the look, and some nice moments. Overall, the writing let him down much like it did the rest of the cast.

They had me completely when they gave him that golden Power Rangers suit in that first episode. MY GOD. I swear if I hadn't already made my choice with Jean-Luc, I'd have fallen for Pike. I was quite willing to forgive them all their plot holes and whatnot as long as Pike was there. (I know, I know, I'm shallow.) :lol:
 
I think Lorca was a bigger missed opportunity than Georgiou. I truly wanted him to be like Marcus or Edison from Abrams Trek, a Starfleet officer who suffered from fear and trauma and loss and became a prick to try and survive.

So in other words a Starfleet officer who doesn't act like a Starfleet officer? That seems a trifle counter-intuitive ... and more to the point I'm completely sick of 'Heroes' of the "Well it's a big, mean, bad Galaxy so let's make it that little bit WORSE just to get by" stripe; quite frankly we have enough Villain Protagonists in Real Life without having to endure them in our Fiction (and they seem especially inappropriate to STAR TREK, which - bless it - has done its best to emphasise the Best in Humanity, rather than the Worst).
 
So in other words a Starfleet officer who doesn't act like a Starfleet officer? That seems a trifle counter-intuitive ... and more to the point I'm completely sick of 'Heroes' of the "Well it's a big, mean, bad Galaxy so let's make it that little bit WORSE just to get by" stripe; quite frankly we have enough Villain Protagonists in Real Life without having to endure them in our Fiction (and they seem especially inappropriate to STAR TREK, which - bless it - has done its best to emphasise the Best in Humanity, rather than the Worst).
Star Trek has often had such villains, officers who are doing what they think is right. Lorca would be the opportunity to explore the psychology of it rather than just being a villain.

Star Trek can emphasize the best of humanity but I don't think you emphasize the best by ignoring humanity's weaknesses.
 
So in other words a Starfleet officer who doesn't act like a Starfleet officer? That seems a trifle counter-intuitive ...

There's Ron Tracey, John Gill, a whole slew of Admirals from TNG who don't act like Starfleet officers. I think, personally, there is an interesting story in what makes one lose their religion. Losing faith in something you've committed your life to doesn't make one a villain. The big thing is that the Gabriel Lorca from the Prime Timeline probably isn't a great guy. I can't believe that Mirror Lorca collected all the stuff from his Discovery mancave in the few short months he was there.
 
There's Ron Tracey, John Gill, a whole slew of Admirals from TNG who don't act like Starfleet officers. I think, personally, there is an interesting story in what makes one lose their religion. Losing faith in something you've committed your life to doesn't make one a villain. The big thing is that the Gabriel Lorca from the Prime Timeline probably isn't a great guy. I can't believe that Mirror Lorca collected all the stuff from his Discovery mancave in the few short months he was there.
The list is quite long:
eYXNdzM.jpg

50ZmiK0.jpg

ivHXfAc.jpg

rivCJRb.jpg

4S8tR4o.jpg

2elT6gK.jpg
 
The list is quite long:
eYXNdzM.jpg

50ZmiK0.jpg

ivHXfAc.jpg

rivCJRb.jpg

4S8tR4o.jpg

2elT6gK.jpg

Maxwell fell off the sanity wagon due to his family being killed, and Sisko was unfortunately tasked with trying to save the Alpha Quadrant. So I tend to give them a pass.
 
Star Trek can emphasize the best of humanity but I don't think you emphasize the best by ignoring humanity's weaknesses.

That's a perfectly fair point and I agree with it, but that doesn't mean I want to spend more than one Season with Captain Queeg at the helm; there's a reason these characters tend to be Villains, after all (and after all, don't we have quite enough fiction exploring Human Weakness or worse than mere weakness already?).


Losing faith in something you've committed your life to doesn't make one a villain.

Not inherently no, but when what you've committed yourself to is the Rights & Dignity of Sapient Beings (not to mention the establishment & perpetuation of same) it's hard to imagine someone losing Faith in that without taking a nosedive into a very black hole indeed.


The big thing is that the Gabriel Lorca from the Prime Timeline probably isn't a great guy. I can't believe that Mirror Lorca collected all the stuff from his Discovery mancave in the few short months he was there.

On the one hand Lorca is not only ingenious, but also a fairly senior Starfleet officer during a time of War (working on an experimental ship); it's quite easy to imagine him either requisitioning these implements under the cloak of wartime necessity ("These kill Klingons!" or "We need to know how to stop these things, so we need to get familiar with them") and/or just straight up stealing them, presumably covering up the thefts by blaming them on the Enemy or pretending these items were blown to pieces as collateral damage.

On the other hand I DO rather like the idea that even Prime-Timeline Captain Lorca has an odd fascination with weaponry of the most lethal sort; it might be interesting to depict him as the sort of Captain who collects this sort of hardware, but prefers to keep it safely decommissioned rather than put it to work.

I definitely think that 'There but for the Grace of God go I' is a much better register for Mirror Universe characters than 'I'm so EVIL I don't even wash my hands!' (with Mirror Universe characters acting as a dark twist on the characters we know and love, rather than a complete moral inversion cranked up to cartoonish levels of super-villainy).

Still, I'm not keen on villain protagonists as a rule and even less keen when they're STAR TREK protagonists; quite frankly we make enough allowances to misbehaviour and misdeeds in Real Life without cheering for nasty characters in fiction.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top