And so do you!Well, I don't know about you guys, but I love Italian!
No, not really. I was trying to find a way to find a measure of common ground but clearly I need to step back.Is this topic really worth the argument?
*Deep Cleansing Breaths*

And so do you!Well, I don't know about you guys, but I love Italian!
No, not really. I was trying to find a way to find a measure of common ground but clearly I need to step back.Is this topic really worth the argument?
*Deep Cleansing Breaths*

I had no plans to take it any further than that whether you said anything or not.
Plus, do recognize I was standing up for BillJ, who I've disagreed with a lot over the years. If I'm sticking up for him, than that says something.
I know you disagree with me about a lot of things, and I don't get the sense that you particularly like me anymore, but I'm on your side. I know you don't believe me, but I'm on your side. I'm someone you can talk to. Not someone you have to deal with.
I used to be a moderator in this forum. Remember? Whatever I do, I have good intentions. I was trying to get fireproof to back off of BillJ.
An inanimate object that I didn't purchase?

I remember the post-Enterprise dark times, when it seemed like there was no room for Star Trek in the 21st century (in fact, I think it seemed that way even DURING Enterprise). Now I feel like I'm living in a golden age.
Instead I see a lot of people criticizing: "Oh no, they made the wrong period to make the new series", "The choice of the actor who will play the fourth extra on the bridge was a disaster", "Ha ha! But have you seen how they made the new warp nacelles? Do they take us for idiots???"
I, on the other hand, am simply happy to know that every now and then I will see a new episode that will take me to the stars. But am I the only one? Too naive and not savvy enough to "really" understand what is needed in a new Star Trek series?
I don't consider anything since 2005 to be what I call "Iconic Star Trek." Enterprise (for all of its considerable flaws) was the last Star Trek series and Nemesis (for all of its even more considerable flaws) the last Trek movie.
I've reached a point in my life where I don't "need" more. I used to watch a guy on YouTube who called this "fanaddictism," and I agree. More and more is made but with ever-diminishing quality and returns. Star Wars is a great example and sadly, so too is Trek.
I'm content with the following: TOS, TAS, Star Trek Continues, the TOS films (GEN doesn't count) and DS9. That's all I'll ever "need" and despite countless rewatches over decades, it's more than enough for me. I also enjoy the great Trek comics and novels of yesteryear.
All of that said, I recognize I don't speak for everyone and don't begrudge folks for liking Abrams/Kurtzman Trek.

Exactly what I figured. I also feel the same way about all the Trek series I like, including TOS, being "my" Star Trek. TOS, TNG, DS9, and VOY are My Old Star Trek. PIC is My Old Star Trek except 20 Years Later. DSC is My New Star Trek.As far as @fireproof78, we mix it up, here and there. I’ve never taken it any anything more than friendly needling. Thanks though for the defense.
Understood.As far as @fireproof78, we mix it up, here and there. I’ve never taken it any anything more than friendly needling. Thanks though for the defense.
McCoy is at very edge of my earliest memories, so I completely understand the sentiment. From that perspective, I'd say TNG and the TOS Movies are my Trek, due to their influence while growing up. They were definitely my gateway sci-fi, if anything else.It's like how Sylvester McCoy is 'my' Doctor in Doctor Who. He's the first one I experienced and the one I grew up with.
I think there's an unfortunate tendency for the term to seem loaded due to the prevalence of the 'not my' thing. Not my Star Trek etc.
Like @fireproof78 I came to sci-fi through different shows and means. I didn't actually watch much Star Trek until my mid-late twenties. I like Star Trek, but if it's not the best show on TV it doesn't overly bother me if it's not pressing my buttons.
I was nodding along until you got to Star Trek Continues. You are interested in "more" you just don't like the "more" they are giving you. Just saying.I don't consider anything since 2005 to be what I call "Iconic Star Trek." Enterprise (for all of its considerable flaws) was the last Star Trek series and Nemesis (for all of its even more considerable flaws) the last Trek movie.
I've reached a point in my life where I don't "need" more. I used to watch a guy on YouTube who called this "fanaddictism," and I agree. More and more is made but with ever-diminishing quality and returns. Star Wars is a great example and sadly, so too is Trek.
I'm content with the following: TOS, TAS, Star Trek Continues, the TOS films (GEN doesn't count) and DS9. That's all I'll ever "need" and despite countless rewatches over decades, it's more than enough for me. I also enjoy the great Trek comics and novels of yesteryear.
All of that said, I recognize I don't speak for everyone and don't begrudge folks for liking Abrams/Kurtzman Trek.
I understand this is a thing (and increasingly a more ordinary thing) it still feels weird. TOS fans, the boomers of Star Trek. (Sometimes literal boomers.)“My Trek” (at the risk of starting that whole thing over again) is Berman Trek. TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT.
You missed a spot!And although I’m not a huge fan of TOS, I love movies 2-6. I probably have them all memorized by now (Nerd Alert!).

Same.I grew up on TOS & TAS, watched TNG in college, and adore DS9. But I also really like DIS, LD, and PRO. At some point, I'll try VOY and ENT again.
I don't want to hint at anything that might even slightly spoil it for you, but I will say that I have never once seen a single person on the internet ever say that Prodigy starts good and gets worse.I’ve always had a pretty hesitant disinterest towards PRO. I’ve tried to get into it a few times in the past and always failed…
However, the past 10 days or so I sat through the first four episodes and… I want to watch the next one, so maybe I finally get it?
I don't want to hint at anything that might even slightly spoil it for you, but I will say that I have never once seen a single person on the internet ever say that Prodigy starts good and gets worse.
It takes about three, certainly at least two for it to get going. Basically the main characters are not Star Trek characters. But they eventually find themselves in a Star Trek show. So you need to get through to that realization. It's like if you spent several episodes with the planetary characters from Gamesters of Triskellion before the Enterprise showed up. (Kinda.)I’ve always had a pretty hesitant disinterest towards PRO. I’ve tried to get into it a few times in the past and always failed…
However, the past 10 days or so I sat through the first four episodes and… I want to watch the next one, so maybe I finally get it?
Maybe.I’ve always had a pretty hesitant disinterest towards PRO. I’ve tried to get into it a few times in the past and always failed…
However, the past 10 days or so I sat through the first four episodes and… I want to watch the next one, so maybe I finally get it?
I probably should have lumped STC along with the comics and novels. At the end of the day, they're fun and feel like my favorite Trek but they're not essential. Everything else I mentioned is, at least to me.I was nodding along until you got to Star Trek Continues. You are interested in "more" you just don't like the "more" they are giving you. Just saying.
I understand this is a thing (and increasingly a more ordinary thing) it still feels weird. TOS fans, the boomers of Star Trek. (Sometimes literal boomers.)
You missed a spot!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.