BriGuy said:
the NX-01 was at a disadvantage to just about everyone they came into contact with.
I really liked that aspect actually. Meant they had to use their brains.
BriGuy said:
the NX-01 was at a disadvantage to just about everyone they came into contact with.
DumbDumb2007 said:
Should the NX-01 have gotten Shieldss in the early or late part of season 1. Or should the show have startd out with the ship simply having defelctor shields.
Anubis said:
BriGuy said:
the NX-01 was at a disadvantage to just about everyone they came into contact with.
I really liked that aspect actually. Meant they had to use their brains.
Finn said:
Heck no. When I first heard about Enterprise, I pictured a cramped ship with a 3-4 person cockpit instead of a bridge, and ladders instead of turbolifts. Personally, I would have gone with that....
Point of order: the corpse wouldn't be frozen. The primary immediate danger from exposure to space is suffocation; freezing takes a lot longer.Cyclopean said:
The NX-01 is much cooler without shields, but obviously the writing should have reflected that better. It IS neat to see a frozen CGI corpse flying out of a hull breach during one of the Xindi battles.
Well, in a vacuum, the cooling is governed by the Stephan-Boltzman law, since the only loss of temperature is from radiation. Happily, http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html#c1 explains the derivation of the cooling time; and even better, the related page http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html#c2 allows one to experiment with cooling times for objects with different physical properties, compositions, temperatures, and so on.Cyclopean said:
^^Corpses can't suffocate.
I just think the effect is cool.
By the way, in your professional opinion, how quickly do you think bodies freeze in 3°K?
You wouldn't happen to have any links about explosive decompression of human tissue in a vaccuum, would you?Nebusj said: Unpleasant, certainly, although you'll be dead from the lack of air long before.
Well, if you like, although maybe the best shorthand is the view of vacuum-breathing from 2001: A Space Odyssey. But probably all the important answers are given succinctly in Dr Emmanual M Roth's 1966 paper Rapid (Explosive) Decompression Emergencies In Pressure-Suited Subjects, which is available on the web at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690004637_1969004637.pdfCyclopean said:
You wouldn't happen to have any links about explosive decompression of human tissue in a vaccuum, would you?Nebusj said: Unpleasant, certainly, although you'll be dead from the lack of air long before.
I'm thinking of that scene in Cold Station 12.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.