Doesn't mean shit anymore. "Breakout" cases are on the rise everywhere. He may easily have been fully vaccinated and still gotten it.
NFL 2021 season - Belichick Strikes Back
- Thread starter BlueStuff
- Start date
For what? Packers will still run away with the NFC North. Best chance Seattle has is for a Wild Card at this point. Depending how long Rodgers is out, it could end up hurting Seattle.
I'm trying to be optimistic, given the division Seattle is in. Hoping that Wilson is back, Rodgers is not, and maybe eek out a win against Green Bay...
Holy shit, he was going something like 150 MPH while double the legal alcohol limit? Adios, pal. You're getting anew uniform.
I'm trying to be optimistic, given the division Seattle is in. Hoping that Wilson is back, Rodgers is not, and maybe eek out a win against Green Bay...
Well, that game is at Green Bay, so there's that.
Also, unless he gets super sick, Rodgers should be off the protocol by then.
I have tickets to the Seahawks/Rams in December. I can't wait for that one.
Million dollar talent, ten cent head. His next uniform maybe for the Nevada Department of Corrections.
Of course he could still have gotten it - the point is that he hasn’t been following protocols for unvaccinated players, possibly contributing to spreading it to more unvaccinated people.
You implied he was unvaccinated when you said "The instant ruling out means that he was unvaccinated". The one has nothing to do with the other any more, and it appears as if you're doubling down on that assertion despite any supporting evidence. I'm saying it doesn't matter if he was vaccinated or not. You can still get it and you can still spread it. Might as well be Kool-Aid in those syringes at this point.
I wouldn’t go that far...
Fair enough - I'd settle for an Electric Vodka Lemonade main-line. At least we can have a little fun while getting the jab, can't we? 
Last edited:
Yeah, that's a strike against the Seahawks.
Implied it? I said it straight out - he’s unvaccinated despite saying he was. Evidence? Look at Rapoport’s report, Garafolo’s report. Davante Adams tested positive but still had a small chance of playing against Arizona days later - because he’s vaccinated. Rodgers is immediately ruled out because he won’t be eligible; no matter what. He’s been breaking protocols all season, lying about his vaccination status. This isn’t a problem for you just because “you can still get it even if you’re vaccinated”?
No shit you can still get it. But getting the vaccine doesn’t make any difference? Am I still posting on a Star Trek forum? Has science disappeared from the world?
Cite proof that he's lying. You're still speaking with unsubstantiated supposition. You mentioned "he's been breaking protocols all season". Sounds more like he's being punished for being an insolent git and they finally got fed up with him in general. If it's proven he's unvaccinated, I'll concede, otherwise I stand by what I said.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nichol...lternative-treatment-to-count-as-vaccine/amp/
What more do you need, exactly?
It hasn't and neither has hyperbole. But, good grief, not everyone who distrusts the vaccine is anti-science. Poor showing on Rodgers part for not following the protocols but the answer of "Just get vaccinated!" is getting old and shows a genuine lack of understanding on the variety of reasons why, and not "anti-science." SMH.
Precisely. The "anti-science" label seems to be gaining steam and poised to overtake "racist" as the catch-all epithet of general disdain these days. More's the pity.
And point conceded on the Rodgers vaccination issue. It is sad that he lied about it - I guess in his mind that "alternative treatment" (what was it anyway?) counted for vaccination, since he tried to leverage it to keep playing.
Oh well...
And point conceded on the Rodgers vaccination issue. It is sad that he lied about it - I guess in his mind that "alternative treatment" (what was it anyway?) counted for vaccination, since he tried to leverage it to keep playing.
Oh well...
Unless someone has trouble with vaccines (which is understandable), what exact stance do they have to not get it that isn't anti-science?
Oh, I don't know. I'm not the one throwing it around willy-nilly everywhere. I guess the mask mandate stuff would apply too in this context, maybe? I just noticed that a lot of people are using it a lot more frequently these days. Just seems to be one more useful thing to divide everyone.
Then I'd say the "anti-science" label is legit. I hate having to hear about it everyday, but it would go away if people simply went and got vaccinated. It is good for them, their families and their communities. There have been 7 billion doses given worldwide of the various vaccines, anecdotal evidence should fall to the wayside. I mean, if your brakes stop working, you don't just decide to keep driving without them because Becky Sue's brother's cousin's nephew's uncle got a bad brake job once.