'That' era became popular with a work of fantasy. I wrote about him because he's still a popular name today.Huh? Jensen Ackles was never in any Stargate production.
'That' era became popular with a work of fantasy. I wrote about him because he's still a popular name today.Huh? Jensen Ackles was never in any Stargate production.
I only knew him from this circling on Canadian TV, it came out 1993:I think Don Davis was fairly well known from Twin Peaks and other roles. He may not have been a big-name star, but he at least would've been in the "Hey, it's that guy" category for many viewers.
the new SG-team is walking towards the Gateroom and Jack O'Neill decked out in a fishing outfit with gear crossing them in the hallway. One of the new SG-team members stuttering to another member "that's the legendary General/Admiral Jack O'Neill" and then that member asking the General/Admiral "Any advice Sir?"
Sure it's always nice to see a show find some unknowns to build up, but there is absolutely no way a show like this is going to limit itself to nothing but newcomers, they're going to want at least a few known experienced actors who they know will be able to carry a show like this, and to bring in viewers.I don't know how many Prime Video shows and movies you watch, but Prime Video – and Netflix too – is known for taking on young actors, some of whom are relatively unknown or in their first acting roles, and making them popular. Prime Video also prefers to select and develop young actors who are unknown or in their first acting roles in many youth shows. They could do that again.
I follow TV and movie productions fairly closely and I never once heard of an actor being cast in a lead role in a show or movie based solely on their IG follower count. Yes there have been a few times where a show has brought in a influencer for a one off guest role, but that's usually a one time bit of stunt casting, and that kind of thing has been a part of Hollywood since long before social media was a thing. Hell even the Rodenberry and Berman era Trek shows did that, like when they had Mick Fleetwood on TNG, then Prince now King Abdulla II of Jordan, and Iggy Pop on DS9.As for Instagram, nowadays many famous actors are cast in films and shows based on their Instagram follower count. Yes, it's a restrictive situation, but Hollywood itself imposes this restriction.
SG-1 itself had some fairly prominent guest stars like Wayne Brady who was huge then.Sure it's always nice to see a show find some unknowns to build up, but there is absolutely no way a show like this is going to limit itself to nothing but newcomers, they're going to want at least a few known experienced actors who they know will be able to carry a show like this, and to bring in viewers.
And I watch a ton of stuff on Netflix and Amazon, and they're filled with tons of big name actors, and even the less well known actors still have fairly big filmographies. I really don't see where the ratio of known to unknow actors on the average Netflix or Prime show is really all that different from any network or cable show.
I follow TV and movie productions fairly closely and I never once heard of an actor being cast in a lead role in a show or movie based solely on their IG follower count. Yes there have been a few times where a show has brought in a influencer for a one off guest role, but that's usually a one time bit of stunt casting, and that kind of thing has been a part of Hollywood since long before social media was a thing. Hell even the Rodenberry and Berman era Trek shows did that, like when they had Mick Fleetwood on TNG, then Prince now King Abdulla II of Jordan, and Iggy Pop on DS9.
And the only concern should be the actor's fitness for the role, and their acting talent, their social media following should not be a concern. So you'd rather see them turn down an incredibly talented actor who was absolute perfect for the role, but who has 6,000,000 followers, in favor of the absolute worst actor who they had ever seen, who did not fit the role at all, but only has 1,000 followers?
Yes there have been a few times where a show has brought in a influencer for a one off guest role, but that's usually a one time bit of stunt casting, and that kind of thing has been a part of Hollywood since long before social media was a thing. Hell even the Rodenberry and Berman era Trek shows did that, like when they had Mick Fleetwood on TNG, then Prince now King Abdulla II of Jordan, and Iggy Pop on DS9.
If they're looking for a similar setup to SG-1/SGA with a male lead playing a military officer with a sense of humor, they could certainly do a lot worse than Ackles. He's also the right age if the character is meant to be around the same rank O'Neill was when SG-1 started.'That' era became popular with a work of fantasy. I wrote about him because he's still a popular name today.
That only came out in 1993? Weird, I could have sworn I'd seen it much earlier than that.I only knew him from this circling on Canadian TV, it came out 1993:
Wikipedia and IMDb say 1993. Wikipedia doesn't have a source.That only came out in 1993? Weird, I could have sworn I'd seen it much earlier than that.
OK, that's a fair point. I was just thinking of names I'd seen of lists of high profile people who appeared on Star Trek, and he was one that came up several times.Then-Prince Abdullah doesn't really fit the category, because he wasn't a well-known celebrity in the US at the time, and his appearance was just a brief walk-on cameo as an extra, arranged as a gift to him because he was a big Trek fan. It was more about catering to him than catering to the audience.
When I first watched that video, I envisioned this project as something similar to Disney's recent Star Wars trilogy, bringing together experienced 'old' and 'new' actors. Then, I thought it would be better if, while having a well-known, popular name in the lead role, the rest of the supporting cast consisted of young, unknown talent and some experienced Stargate actors. I think they could have brought in a well-known but not cheap TV actor like Jason Momoa (although he played in the series before he became famous, he's now known for popular TV shows and movies) or Jensen Ackles. When I mentioned Netflix stars in my initial review, I was mostly thinking of the extremely popular actors from Stranger Things, but they would never accept this project unless they were offered $20 million a season. As for Wednesday Show, none of them would accept except Emma Myers, and even she would only accept because she's a "nerd." (Let me explain Emma Myers' "nerd" status: most of the films she's in, or will be in, are either fantasy, science fiction, or animation.) Beyond that, younger actors who have appeared in projects like Outer Banks and Ginny & Georgia might also accept projects, but some also star in films alongside more popular actors like Mel Gibson or Johnny Depp; those two names are probably more popular than all the actors in the Stargate series combined. As for Prime Video, with a few exceptions, none of the actors in shows like The Boys or Gen V earn less than half the money that popular names like Millie Bobby Brown or Jenna Ortega earn in a single project, so those names could also be on the list.Sure it's always nice to see a show find some unknowns to build up, but there is absolutely no way a show like this is going to limit itself to nothing but newcomers, they're going to want at least a few known experienced actors who they know will be able to carry a show like this, and to bring in viewers.
And I watch a ton of stuff on Netflix and Amazon, and they're filled with tons of big name actors, and even the less well known actors still have fairly big filmographies. I really don't see where the ratio of known to unknow actors on the average Netflix or Prime show is really all that different from any network or cable show.
I follow TV and movie productions fairly closely and I never once heard of an actor being cast in a lead role in a show or movie based solely on their IG follower count. Yes there have been a few times where a show has brought in a influencer for a one off guest role, but that's usually a one time bit of stunt casting, and that kind of thing has been a part of Hollywood since long before social media was a thing. Hell even the Rodenberry and Berman era Trek shows did that, like when they had Mick Fleetwood on TNG, then Prince now King Abdulla II of Jordan, and Iggy Pop on DS9.
And the only concern should be the actor's fitness for the role, and their acting talent, their social media following should not be a concern. So you'd rather see them turn down an incredibly talented actor who was absolute perfect for the role, but who has 6,000,000 followers, in favor of the absolute worst actor who they had ever seen, who did not fit the role at all, but only has 1,000 followers?
they are winningAs for Prime Video, with a few exceptions, none of the actors in shows like The Boys or Gen V earn less than half the money that popular names like Millie Bobby Brown or Jenna Ortega earn in a single project, so those names could also be on the list.
I'm really confused, is your problem that you don't like actors who have been on Amazon & Netlfix shows, or just that you don't think they'd be able to afford them?When I first watched that video, I envisioned this project as something similar to Disney's recent Star Wars trilogy, bringing together experienced 'old' and 'new' actors. Then, I thought it would be better if, while having a well-known, popular name in the lead role, the rest of the supporting cast consisted of young, unknown talent and some experienced Stargate actors. I think they could have brought in a well-known but not cheap TV actor like Jason Momoa (although he played in the series before he became famous, he's now known for popular TV shows and movies) or Jensen Ackles. When I mentioned Netflix stars in my initial review, I was mostly thinking of the extremely popular actors from Stranger Things, but they would never accept this project unless they were offered $20 million a season. As for Wednesday Show, none of them would accept except Emma Myers, and even she would only accept because she's a "nerd." (Let me explain Emma Myers' "nerd" status: most of the films she's in, or will be in, are either fantasy, science fiction, or animation.) Beyond that, younger actors who have appeared in projects like Outer Banks and Ginny & Georgia might also accept projects, but some also star in films alongside more popular actors like Mel Gibson or Johnny Depp; those two names are probably more popular than all the actors in the Stargate series combined. As for Prime Video, with a few exceptions, none of the actors in shows like The Boys or Gen V earn less than half the money that popular names like Millie Bobby Brown or Jenna Ortega earn in a single project, so those names could also be on the list.
No, I love it. But I think some of the actors on Netflix are too big for this kind of project and will cause problems among the experienced actors from Stargate. I was trying to say that the Stargate producers shouldn't choose such big names for this project. I was implying that Jason Momoa wouldn't have any problems with the team because he's been in a Stargate project before and is still friends with some of the actors from Atlantis. I said Jensen Ackles probably won't be cheap, but he's an actor who, for example, won't earn as much money as Millie Bobby Brown earns in any Netflix movie.I'm really confused, is your problem that you don't like actors who have been on Amazon & Netlfix shows, or just that you don't think they'd be able to afford them?
(Let me explain Emma Myers' "nerd" status: most of the films she's in, or will be in, are either fantasy, science fiction, or animation.)
Yes, her role in the BBC show "A Good Girl's Guide to Murder" is the complete opposite of what I'm saying, but she generally chooses productions that suit her tastes, such as the Minecraft movie, Angry Birds Movie 3, and even the English dub of Star Wars Visions season 3. For example, she accepted the Minecraft movie simply because she's a Minecraft fan. She even had a role in the body-switching themed film "Family Switch," which was released on Netflix.That doesn't follow. It's true that Myers is a fantasy buff in real life (specifically Star Wars and Lord of the Rings according to Wikipedia), but it doesn't make sense to assume that an actor's choice of roles is necessarily motivated by their personal tastes. After all, typecasting is an age-old practice; lots of people who don't like SF or fantasy have ended up typecast in genre roles anyway, because actors tend to get offered roles similar to their earlier ones whether they like it or not.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.