1. That's where you and I disagree.
2. I'm an 'absolutist' in that I treat Word of God statements (like Dario Scardapane's comment about ignoring the events of She-Hulk) as absolutely definitive and binding when they're not explicitly and definitively contravened by onscreen evidence
It's the same reason why I give Christopher Markus and Steven McFeely's comments about their intention for the end of Steve Rogers' story as presented in Endgame - that,he went back into the past of his own timeline and married Peggy, thus creating a Closed Loop where he was always her unseen husband - more credence and hold said intent as Canonically binding over the Russo Brothers' interpretation that he created a Branched Timeline and then somehow acquired the Pym Particles necessary to return to his own timeline in the year 2023.
In my 'absolutist' point of view, the inclusion of the She-Hulk Daredevil helmet in Born Again does not constitute evidence that is explicitly and unequivocally in opposition to Dario Scardapane's statement that he ignored the events of She-Hulk and that said events did not happen to the version of Matt Murdock that emerged following the retooling of Born Again.