• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    185
Why are people in such a hurry to pass judgement one way or the other?

It's called humanity. We're not nice. We're ugly pieces of trash.
Now.... I also don't believe in guilty before proven innocent. But when so many people are coming out confirming this behaviour as a pattern....
And yes, I know it's easy to say that it's jumping on the bandwagon because people are saying things.... But for many people, it's a HUGE threshold to come out and speak up about what people have done. Especially when they are popular. But when they see that one person had the guts to do it, they feel empowered and WILL speak up. THAT is also human nature, and thankfully a sign that perhaps we're not ugly trash but actually stronger together.
 
So, does that means we're supposed to view him as guilty before there is even a trial?

It's not that I believe he is innocent. It's just that I would rather wait until the trial. Why are people in such a hurry to pass judgement one way or the other?
Trials get things wrong, and are this not a good barometer of ones opinion.
 
So, does that means we're supposed to view him as guilty before there is even a trial?

It's not that I believe he is innocent. It's just that I would rather wait until the trial. Why are people in such a hurry to pass judgement one way or the other?
I mean, people will judge based on presented evidence.

Personally, I would rather wait until the trial and see more evidence but that doesn't mean the verdict will satisfy, simply because lawyers work not just from a facts based, but a legal base to get their clients acquitted of any legal malfeasance.
 
So, does that means we're supposed to view him as guilty before there is even a trial?

You can't name anybody off the top of your head that you know is guilty even after a trial claims otherwise?

Marvel really made some errors on casting after Endgame, didn't they? Though on the other hand, for mostly creative/financial reasons at least, they did alright with recasting Banner and Rhodes. So doesn't have to mean the end of anything planned necessarily.
 
You can't name anybody off the top of your head that you know is guilty even after a trial claims otherwise?

I would never assume that I, a spectator watching from a distance, am remotely as qualified to make that decision as a jury that heard every bit of the evidence. I might have my beliefs, but only fools confuse belief with "knowing."
 
Temp thread closure while participants consider if there is anything left to say that is actually on the topic.
 
And on that note, several pieces of news:

I'm sure most people have heard about this, but The Wrap reported yesterday that Marvel will not be giving a presentation at Hall H this year. Following on the heels of that news, Variety reported today that Netflix, Sony, HBO, and Universal are also skipping this year's Comic Con.

On a different note, for those who haven't watched The Flash yet, AVOID the io9 article titled "Secret Invasion's Samuel L. Jackson Won't Be Resurrected Via AI" because they very casually, without warning or apology, spoiled one of the big surprise cameos in the film. I hadn't even heard a peep about this potential cameo and I haven't had a chance to see the film yet, so to have it spoiled for me in a Marvel article about a DC film that's been out for only a year has made me very grumpy.
 
Last edited:
I hate random articles that spoil stuff like that. I already knew about the cameo in question, because I haven't been trying to avoid spoilers for The Flash, but I never would have expected that article to give that particular spoiler if I'd just clicked on it unaware of anything.
 
And on that note, several pieces of news:

I'm sure most people have heard about this, but The Wrap reported yesterday that Marvel will not be giving a presentation at Hall H this year. Following on the heels of that news, Variety reported today that Netflix, Sony, HBO, and Universal are also skipping this year's Comic Con.

On a different note, for those who haven't watched The Flash yet, AVOID the io9 article titled "Secret Invasion's Samuel L. Jackson Won't Be Resurrected Via AI" because they very casually, without warning or apology, spoiled one of the big surprise cameos in the film. I hadn't even heard a peep about this potential cameo and I haven't had a chance to see the film yet, so to have it spoiled for me in a Marvel article about a DC film that's been out for only a year has made me very grumpy.
Marvel NOT at Comic Con? If they aren't, but DC is...????
 
It's because of the writers' strike and the probable actors' strike. Apparently DC has enough stuff in the can that they may still go to Comic Con.

DC does??? Which can? Seems more like the trash can! (I wanted DC to succeed, really)

But itxseems like MARVEL would be the one with completed work , like The Marvels, or other stuff that could at least have a trailer.... way more than the DCOU
 
I'm just going by what I read either in the Variety article or the io9 article where I first saw it reported.

The Wrap story says Marvel will have a presence at Comic Con, but they're not doing a big Hall H presentation where they talk about all of the big future plans. Stuff that's all on hold because of the strikes.
 
DC does??? Which can? Seems more like the trash can! (I wanted DC to succeed, really)

But itxseems like MARVEL would be the one with completed work , like The Marvels, or other stuff that could at least have a trailer.... way more than the DCOU

Marvel has The Marvels, Loki season 2 and probably Echo. No reason to think anything beyond that could be anywhere near a trailer.

DC has Blue Beetle and Aquaman 2. It's really not that big of a difference.
 
The vast majority of the things they announced last year are nowhere near production and most of the stuff that is has now been delayed by the strike.
 
ComicBook.com reports that Disney has released a synopsis for Loki's second season:

Loki Season 2 picks up in the aftermath of the shocking season finale when Loki finds himself in a battle for the soul of the Time Variance Authority," the new synopsis reads. "Along with Mobius, Hunter B-15 and a team of new and returning characters, Loki navigates an ever-expanding and increasingly dangerous multiverse in search of Sylvie, Judge Renslayer, Miss Minutes and the truth of what it means to possess free will and glorious purpose.
Fairly generic but I figured it was worth sharing here. The article notes that while Kang isn't mentioned, Jonathan Majors is still listed as a cast member.

Meanwhile, ComicBookMovie.com reports that Aubrey Plaza talked about her experience working on Coven of Chaos:

'Coven of Chaos' was so fun. I wanted very much to work with Kathryn Hahn, I think she's so great. And without saying anything really, I had a blast. I loved my character in that as well, and I think it's the most elevated Marvel material that's out there. So, it was cool to jump into that world with those people specifically.​
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top