• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    185
It seems weird then that we would get a release date for Hawkeye before Ms. Marvel if it's coming out first.
Ms. Marvel is probably going to be a lot more effects heavy than Hawkeye, so maybe they decided to release Hawkeye first to give them time to finish the effects for Ms. Marvel. A lot of the FX companies have been having their people work from home, and so that could have slowed things down a bit more than they expected.


Also, with the Black Widow movie finally coming out, and it's potential tie in to Hawkeye show...seems to make sense to place Hawkeye closer, to create more buzz. I know that wasn't the original plan due to Covid, but here we are.
 
Also, with the Black Widow movie finally coming out, and it's potential tie in to Hawkeye show...seems to make sense to place Hawkeye closer, to create more buzz. I know that wasn't the original plan due to Covid, but here we are.
With that in mind, it'll be the first show that'll where the film is leading into the show and not the other way as already seen with the last three shows.
 
With that in mind, it'll be the first show that'll where the film is leading into the show and not the other way as already seen with the last three shows.

I found the ending of WandaVision a little disappointing when I realized the whole series had basically just been about moving pieces into place for the next thing.
 
In the comics, it was black/blue. So blonde is way out there for me, in terms of character origins AND even the actress they have. She originally wasn't a cyborg either (I never knew her as one from my cosmic reading days until the movie, actually)
Yeah, I figured that was the case. All I knew of Nebula before the films was "The Infinity Gauntlet" and Marcel trading cards.

I only said red for Karen's sake. :lol:
 
In the comics, it was black/blue. So blonde is way out there for me, in terms of character origins AND even the actress they have. She originally wasn't a cyborg either (I never knew her as one from my cosmic reading days until the movie, actually)
It happened a little later, maybe during Infinity Watch. Basically, she's left near dead and has to be rebuilt.
 
I kind of took it for granted that you'd need to watch Captain America: The First Avenger first if you were doing a Chronological Watch of the MCU, but then I got reminded that the film actually starts with a present-day scene and then flashes back to the 40s, which means that it really shouldn't be the first movie chronologically; the 90s-set Captain Marvel should actually get that distinction, although I've not seen anyone else recognizing that fact.
 
I kind of took it for granted that you'd need to watch Captain America: The First Avenger first if you were doing a Chronological Watch of the MCU, but then I got reminded that the film actually starts with a present-day scene and then flashes back to the 40s, which means that it really shouldn't be the first movie chronologically; the 90s-set Captain Marvel should actually get that distinction, although I've not seen anyone else recognizing that fact.

If you want to be accurate, you need to watch the 1940s parts first and then the modern day stuff right before The Avengers. You also need to watch Dr. Strange in small increments spread throughout the other MCU films. And remember the Ant Man flashbacks that need to be watched before Captain Marvel--for that matter, the opening sequence to Black Widow should be watched just before or after watching Captain Marvel. The MCU needs to hire Snyder to do an ultra extended cut for sure.
 
@theenglish That's 'micromanaging' things to an insane level.

Prologues that are clearly flashbacks are different from what actually happens with Cap 1 because that movie is one giant flashback and, if you actually think about it, therefore doesn't truly work narratively if you move it away from where it was released.

Realizing that Cap 1 doesn't actually work as the first installment in a Chronological Watch of the MCU has got me reevaluating whether or not the DCEU's Wonder Woman actually works as the first installment in a Chronological Watch of that series, and I'm starting to change my mind there as well (but that's a topic for elsewhere).

Based on Cap 1 being an extended flashback (and ignoring all credits stings), this is what I now think makes the most sense as a Chronological Watch for the MCU movies (ignoring the TV series):
[Phase One]
* Captain Marvel
* Iron Man
* Iron Man 2
* The Incredible Hulk
* Thor
* Captain America: The First Avenger
* The Avengers
*"Iron Man 3

[Phase Two]
*Thor: The Dark World
* Captain America: The Winter Soldier
* Guardians of the Galaxy
* Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
* Avengers: Age of Ultron
Ant-Man
* Captain America: Civil War
* Black Widow

[Phase Three]
* Black Panther
* Spider-Man Homecoming
* Doctor Strange
* Thor: Ragnarok
* Ant-Man and The Wasp
* Avengers: Infinity War
* Avengers: Endgame
* Spider-Man: Far from Home
 
When it comes to this kind of stuff, I usually just go with wherever the majority of the movie takes place. So even though they are technically later in the timeline, I'd do Capt. America and Wonder Woman first in a chronological rewatch.
If you want to be accurate, you need to watch the 1940s parts first and then the modern day stuff right before The Avengers. You also need to watch Dr. Strange in small increments spread throughout the other MCU films. And remember the Ant Man flashbacks that need to be watched before Captain Marvel--for that matter, the opening sequence to Black Widow should be watched just before or after watching Captain Marvel. The MCU needs to hire Snyder to do an ultra extended cut for sure.

Flashbacks from all 3 Thor movies before anything else.
There's also the '90s and '70s flasbacks in the first Guardians of the Galaxy movies.
 
Yep, it's not as bad as watching Star Wars chronologically but it's still a big "Why?"
Part of the beauty of Star Wars is that you can watch it in pretty much any order and it really doesn't matter all that much. Indeed knowing how Lucas thinks, I suspect that was by design as a more subtle allusion to the old serials that inspired most of the initial conception.
 
Ehhh I dunno. I really don't think you should watch 1-3 before 4-5. I mean you can. But I think 4 and 5 are so clearly better as an entry into the world.

I mean, the Yoda and Vader revelations alone.
 
Ehhh I dunno. I really don't think you should watch 1-3 before 4-5. I mean you can. But I think 4 and 5 are so clearly better as an entry into the world.

I mean, the Yoda and Vader revelations alone.
For a first watch, yes. When I do a rewatch and include Clone Wars, Rebels and the others I go chronological.
 
Ehhh I dunno. I really don't think you should watch 1-3 before 4-5. I mean you can. But I think 4 and 5 are so clearly better as an entry into the world.

I mean, the Yoda and Vader revelations alone.

I like "Machete Order" -- 4, 5, 1 (optionally), 2, 3, 6. You get the big revelation about Vader at the end of Empire, then the prequels are an extended flashback contextualizing it before the climax. (Although I skipped TPM altogether when I tried it, and it worked fine. It really doesn't contain anything essential to the rest of the films, although the Maul stuff has plenty of payoff on TV.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top