New Mutants doesn't exactly seem to be setting the world on fire with its advanced buzz, either.
Really? I've heard mostly encouraging things about it so far.
New Mutants doesn't exactly seem to be setting the world on fire with its advanced buzz, either.
And it might do good at the theater too since Bond moved and april does not have much competition.Really? I've heard mostly encouraging things about it so far.
I think perhaps you should join Copper, Clark and Garry for the moment until proof is posted on that.
How does this sound? I hope that this is forward-thinking casting. That he has actually been cast as Nightmare for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and they want to establish him in Loki first.Excellent. Hopefully the character is properly evil.![]()
Yes it's a shame the MCU will never be able to achieve those dizzy heights of Apocalypse, Dark Phoenix, The Last Stand and Origins: Wolverine
It did reach, it reached lower than, those lows. Iron Man 2 was worse than The Last Stand and the first Wolverine.
It did reach, it reached lower than, those lows. Iron Man 2 was worse than The Last Stand and the first Wolverine.
Wolverine Origins was one of the worst films in the history of the genre.
I don't think Iron Man 2 is bad, I think it suffers in opinion because it is (IMO) the first movie to fit the MCU mold, which makes it tonally different from its well regarded predecessor. Iron Man was largely a stand alone superhero tale, being the first MCU movie. IM2, on the other hand, begins bringing in the larger Marvel universe in Nick Fury and Black Widow. I feel like it has more Feige influence in its DNA, whereas IM1 has more Favreau. If you view it through that lens, as more of the first real MCU movie instead of as a sequel to Iron Man, I found for me it was way more enjoyable.
Not even close. Maybe, *maybe* the second Thor movie fits into that category.
I agree it's the worst film in the X-Men series, but it's not really that bad; it's more just that it feels like a Cliffs Notes summary of a longer, more coherent film. And I've seen worse superhero movies, like Catwoman or the Josh Trank Fant4stic. You can read about a number of reportedly even worse ones here, reviewed by our own Keith DeCandido: https://www.tor.com/series/the-great-superhero-movie-rewatch/
For the rest, there's a LOT more wrong with Origins than just the coherence of the film. Bad performances. Terrible FX. The ending with Deadpool is one of the dumbest creative decisions I've ever seen. Of all the superhero movies I've seen, the only ones that are truly on that low of a level, imo, are Justice League, Kick-Ass 2 and Batman and Robin.
I'm not saying it's good, by any means. Like I said, it's the worst Fox X-Men movie, and there's a fair amount of competition for that slot. I'm just saying I've seen even worse. Origins is a mess, but there are some things about it that at least marginally work, or at least aren't as bad as the hype would have it.
As for Justice League, I like it a lot better than BvS or Suicide Squad, both of which are staggeringly incoherent for professionally made films. I said Origins felt like a condensed summary of a better movie -- BvS feels similar, but it's more like a loose agglomeration of random, disconnected lines and scenes that only vaguely and impressionistically form the rough outline of a story. JL is kind of a mess itself, but the parts that work are much better than anything in the other two, IMHO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.