• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Least Relatable Character?

The Cardassian/Bajoran = Nazi/Jewish thing is obvious..
And stupid, since it doesn't work, for already stated reasons. If they intended that to be the parallel, then they failed very badly and misrepresented the Nazis and Holocaust. I would rather believe that they did not.

The only episode in which it works is "Duet" - as it is about a concentration camp and genocide, but it is obvious in the show that the overall policy of the Cardassian Occupation was nothing like "The Final Solution". And it's not like Nazi holocaust is the only historical example of genocide. Far from that.

The only reason that some people find it "obvious" is because comparing everything and everyone to Nazis is so popular - that's why the Godwin law was invented. And it's popular because it is easier to make a point about something being evil if you compare it to the Nazis. It makes things so simple and removes any potential political controversy or moral ambiguity. Try talking about the colonialism instead, or, say, about Turks and Armenians or Kurds, or wars in ex-Yugoslavia, or Palestine, or Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you're opening a big can of worms. Much safer to talk about the Nazis - there, everyone except for a small minority of neo-Nazi freaks will agree that they were evil, and you don't have to worry about stirring up shit.

Oh yeah, there is another reason: we've all seen so many movies about the Nazis. And if I were to be particularly cynical, I'd say that Trek's Cardassian imagery - their uniforms, for instance - evoke the movie Nazis and Nazi chic, rather than having similarities with real-life Nazis. :shifty:
 
Kira's supposed faith had no content beyond an earring and the occasional snippet of dialogue when the plot required it. Yet she was supposed to be devout. This is self contradictory, hence nonsense. Which means that Kira is not relatable because she is more psychologically realistic, the ridiculous claim being made. Which aspect of relatability is in fact very much on topic.

She was shown regularly going to religious services, and accepted Winn as Kai even though Kira hated her personally. She regularly insisted to Sisko that she believed the Prophets were not aliens, but Gods. And yes, she always wore her earing, a Bajoran equivalent of a crucifix in Christianity. That her religious belief was not the subject of every episode is not self-contradictory. Rather, it's the burden of a continuing series with a variety of interests.

Personally, I don't find Kira's "faith" in the face of clear evidence of the Prophet's extraterrestrial origins to be particularly relatable, since I'm an atheist who puts his trust in science. But I also don't find her behaviour to be unbelievable, since it reflects many people I know. I really don't see what you're getting at, stj.
 
Since I am a religious person, I come at this issue from almost the opposite side as Harvey, but I nonetheless strongly agree with him. I don't bring up my faith all that often - particularly when I'm around people who I know believe something different. I bring it up when it's pertinent but if it's not, I don't - kind of like what I'm doing right here, now that I think about it. Volume of religious verbiage is not a particularly useful way to measure religious faith.
 
The character that comes to mind[as the least relatable character] is: Commanda Trip Tucka....Mr.'What are your orders Cap'n?'

Dude is just not interesting to me.
 
I relate to Trip, then again, I've actually used the phrase "I don't like the way you smell either" in real life.
 
The Cardassian/Bajoran = Nazi/Jewish thing is obvious..
And stupid, since it doesn't work, for already stated reasons. If they intended that to be the parallel, then they failed very badly and misrepresented the Nazis and Holocaust. I would rather believe that they did not.

The only episode in which it works is "Duet" - as it is about a concentration camp and genocide, but it is obvious in the show that the overall policy of the Cardassian Occupation was nothing like "The Final Solution". And it's not like Nazi holocaust is the only historical example of genocide. Far from that.

The only reason that some people find it "obvious" is because comparing everything and everyone to Nazis is so popular - that's why the Godwin law was invented. And it's popular because it is easier to make a point about something being evil if you compare it to the Nazis. It makes things so simple and removes any potential political controversy or moral ambiguity. Try talking about the colonialism instead, or, say, about Turks and Armenians or Kurds, or wars in ex-Yugoslavia, or Palestine, or Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you're opening a big can of worms. Much safer to talk about the Nazis - there, everyone except for a small minority of neo-Nazi freaks will agree that they were evil, and you don't have to worry about stirring up shit.

Oh yeah, there is another reason: we've all seen so many movies about the Nazis. And if I were to be particularly cynical, I'd say that Trek's Cardassian imagery - their uniforms, for instance - evoke the movie Nazis and Nazi chic, rather than having similarities with real-life Nazis. :shifty:
You and ther other guy whose name I can't really remember (Decker avatar) may have anayzed your way right out of something simple.
We aren't supposed to follow the whole arc of DS9 and compare it to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.
Not every episode of DS9 that features Cardassians and Bajorans is supposed to be an allegory for the Nazis/Jews either, but the first resemblance is still there, and I believe intended.
 
I have. He's well on his way to being a self made millionaire by the age of 25. Extremely charismatic and lead-by-example manager.

I never found Riker charismatic, or charming, or even interesting. He was just a tall guy who looked good in a jumpsuit until he started putting on the pounds. Frakes was a competent television actor playing a natual-born second banana.
 
[Q

You and ther other guy whose name I can't really remember (Decker avatar) may have anayzed your way right out of something simple.
We aren't supposed to follow the whole arc of DS9 and compare it to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.
Not every episode of DS9 that features Cardassians and Bajorans is supposed to be an allegory for the Nazis/Jews either, but the first resemblance is still there, and I believe intended.
Well yeah, because not only they are militaristic and oppressive (meh, that's really not exclusive to the Nazis), but more importantly, they wear black uniforms, gloves and jackboots! Duh! Apparently Cardassians like to be dressed up already when they take their leave to go to the Military and Nazi Chic Night at the local leather club. (It's usually the night after the Zombie Chic Goth Night that the Borg like to attend.) :evil: :rommie:
 
[Q

You and ther other guy whose name I can't really remember (Decker avatar) may have anayzed your way right out of something simple.
We aren't supposed to follow the whole arc of DS9 and compare it to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.
Not every episode of DS9 that features Cardassians and Bajorans is supposed to be an allegory for the Nazis/Jews either, but the first resemblance is still there, and I believe intended.
Well yeah, because not only they are militaristic and oppressive (meh, that's really not exclusive to the Nazis), but more importantly, they wear black uniforms, gloves and jackboots! Duh! Apparently Cardassians like to be dressed up already when they take their leave to go to the Military and Nazi Chic Night at the local leather club. (It's usually the night after the Zombie Chic Goth Night that the Borg like to attend.) :evil: :rommie:


Mmmmmm.....Zombie Chic Goths. :D

Was the fellow playing Dukat the ame guy who was Scorpio in Dirty Harry? :borg:
 
[Q

You and ther other guy whose name I can't really remember (Decker avatar) may have anayzed your way right out of something simple.
We aren't supposed to follow the whole arc of DS9 and compare it to the rise and fall of the Third Reich.
Not every episode of DS9 that features Cardassians and Bajorans is supposed to be an allegory for the Nazis/Jews either, but the first resemblance is still there, and I believe intended.
Well yeah, because not only they are militaristic and oppressive (meh, that's really not exclusive to the Nazis), but more importantly, they wear black uniforms, gloves and jackboots! Duh! Apparently Cardassians like to be dressed up already when they take their leave to go to the Military and Nazi Chic Night at the local leather club. (It's usually the night after the Zombie Chic Goth Night that the Borg like to attend.) :evil: :rommie:

Yeah, and the night before the Zombie Chic Goth Night is the 80s thrash metalhead night that the Klingons are so fond of.

Then there's the Beatles night for the Vulcans and Romulans.

And the Blue Man group night for Bolians and Andorians! :guffaw:
 
I repeat--insisting the Cardassians=Nazis and Bajorans=Jews can only be correct if there is a literal one to one correspondence is stupid. Since neither Cardassians, Bajorans, Nazis and Jews are numerical quantities nor algebraic variables, the equals sign is plainly a metaphor. But even if one is foolish enough to take it literally, it still applies to Duet and Ensign Ro. There are no other tenable analog, or even interpretations, for those key early episodes. If you dismiss them, you might as well dismiss the entire DS9 series.

The desperate attempts to reinterpret the Obsidian Order as a Japanese military faction instead of an analog of the SS, with the Central Command as Wehrmacht OKW, or the earring as crucifix instead of phylactery fail miserably. The claim that Nerys was regularly shown attending services is not true of the first season. I really doubt there is any real disagreement with me on this, just malice. I don't think anyone can honestly claim there wasn't intent for the identification. The Prophets could have been called The Oracles, or The Devas, or just The Gods. It's unbelievable anyone is so style deaf they can't get the point.

Kira's suspicion of Sisko's Emissary status, hugely important to the original character, doesn't make any sense, except as a Jew being reluctant to conceive of a non-Jewish Messiah. If the Bajoran religion were not a standin for Judaism, the question of why she didn't accept the Prophets guidance immediately. No one asks because everyone understands the basic equation.

The Prophets allowed Cardassia to rule Bajor and slaughter Bajorans, as Yahweh allowed the Romans to disposses the Jews. Jews have long ago come to terms with it, either rationalizing it or turning their religion into an ethnic identity. The Bajorans on TV are not concerned with this recent catastrophic history because they are Jews for whom this is not recent catastrophic history. But for Kira, the starring Bajoran, it is not old news, but supposedly personal history. Her non-reaction is entirely inconsistent with her purported on screen biography. Hence it is unbelievable. Those who relate to Kira do not do so because she is more consistent or more believeable.
 
I repeat--insisting the Cardassians=Nazis and Bajorans=Jews can only be correct if there is a literal one to one correspondence is stupid. Since neither Cardassians, Bajorans, Nazis and Jews are numerical quantities nor algebraic variables, the equals sign is plainly a metaphor. But even if one is foolish enough to take it literally, it still applies to Duet and Ensign Ro. There are no other tenable analog, or even interpretations, for those key early episodes. If you dismiss them, you might as well dismiss the entire DS9 series.
Well, yes, of course! It is a well-known fact that Nazi Germany invaded the Jewish state and occupied it for several decades, and the oppressed Jews fought back and became famous for their terrorist activities and their many terrorist organizations that managed to put fear into the Nazis despite their military power and made them reconsider the occupation...

Um.... :rolleyes:

It is very amusing to see someone argue that Bajorans and Cardassians on DS9 are a literal analogy for Jews and Nazis, and then argue that literal analogies are stupid. :vulcan:

Thing is, Bajor and Cardassia can stand for many different nations and groups. There have certainly been many cases of occupation and imperialism throughout history. There is no one on one correspondence, and you know what that means? That there be many different analogies that people can - and do - draw to all kinds of different real life examples. Be careful with the literal analogies - you may not like some of them as much as you like the one you keep insisting on.

For instance, when I was reading the DS9 novel Betrayal, and this passage was interesting:

He turned back to Jake. "All right, I have a few minutes. Look, the Cardassian occupation hurt the Bajorans in a lot of different ways. I don't mean just deaths and physical damage to their world, like the damage you can see here on the station. The Cardassians were ruthless. They didn't care if they left a single soul living on Bajor. At least here on DS-Nine they had to leave basic life-support systems intact.

"It was a brutal occupation. And if you learn one thing, Jake, learn this: Brutality only breeds more brutality. The Bajorans used to be a peaceful people. When the Cardassians first invaded, they had no idea how to fight back. But the occupation taught them to fight repression with terrorism. Three entire generations were brought up that way, living in exile and in forced-labor camps."

It was like one of those word-association tests, Sisko thought to himself:

Klingon / warrior

Bajoran / terrorist

"But I don't get it," Jake protested. "The Cardassians are gone now. The Bajorans won! They got their world back. So why are they still fighting and blowing things up?"

"That's what I'm trying to explain. Strange things can happen to people when they've spent their whole lives fighting for a cause. Think about it: Now that you've won, who gets to pick up the pieces? Who gets to put them back together again? Who gets which share of what little there is left?

"They have peace now, but they can't quite remember what peace used to be like. Some of them have forgotten any other way of resolving a dispute. Violence can turn into a way of life. And, besides, only a minority of the Bajorans are involved in all this factional infighting. But the entire world suffers from their reputation. Too many people think all Bajorans are terrorists."
This sounds somehow familiar... but it hardly reminded me of Jews. At least not in the role of Bajorans.
 
Yes, the Bajoran earings are truly phylactery! I admit, I had to look that up to find out that you were referring to tefillin, stj, which I knew by sight if not by name until now.

On that point, the only way in which the Bajoran earings are "obviously" a Jewish tefillin, rather than a Christian Crucifix is that it helps to fill out your Bajoran=Jew equation. Nevermind that a crucifix necklace, like a Bajoran earing, is a simple piece of jewelry, while the tefillin is not. Never mind that it is not widely worn (orthodox Judaism restricts the tefillin to adolescent boys, other iterations of Judaism discard it altogether).

I must admit, however, that a Star of David would fit your argument much more elegantly, so I won't belabour the point.

You insist that the Bajorans don't blame the Prophets for the occupation. Some don't, some do. As I recall, the followers of the Pah-Wraiths were rather distraught at the Prophets' lack of intervention. Also of importance is that the occupation lasted for fifty years, the Jewish holocaust twelve years. Enough time, I think, for religious dogma to come up with theological excuses for the lack of divine intervention.

You claim that Nerys didn't attend religious services regularly during the first season. I have no idea if this assertion is valid or not, but it seems besides the point, because Nerys did regularly attend services over the course of the series, and regularly spoke of her faith as well.

Lastly, your point that Nerys' inability to immediately accept Sisko as the Emissary seems rather silly (or, to appropriate your language, fails miserably). In the same way that she is troubled by Winn's ascension to Kai, she is troubled by Sisko being named Emissary. But due to her faith, Nerys does not project these personal feelings into outright hostility.

But, the Federation offered no hand of intervention during the Occupation. The Cardassians left because (a) they had strip-mined the planet into worthlessness and (b) Bajoran terrorist attacks destroyed their resolve (and their numbers). And after all that, in which she was an important participant, Nerys has to accept not only the Federation's presence on DS9, but after so many Bajorans have died, a non-Bajoran who she is already in conflict with is named Emissary! That such behavior could only be believable if the Bajorans are metaphoric Jews is an absurd notion.
 
^^^And I've already pointed out that there is no analogue to the wormhole, which also shows there is not only not a literal allegory to WWII, but has no resemblance to anything on Earth. I've also noted that the Dominion is analogous to the USSR, which did not come to blows with the US and UK!

So what is your point? That you don't understand what I do mean? I rather think not, since you haven't troubled to ask for clarification. You would much rather pretend I made a literal analogy despite the glaring fact that I didn't.

Your problem is that you can't make any useful comparisons between Kira, her religion and her personal history with anything besides Nazis and Jews. There's nothing in real world history that makes her peculiar character more understandable. There are no other analogies that can enlighten us as to how her character is more consistent and more believable, hence more relatable. You can't even cite that episode where Bajor was retconned with a caste system because it's inconsistent with the opening of the series!

You're left with a character who is supposedly devout, but doesn't think about her religion, even when she meets the Emissary! She is supposedly a civilian turned resistance fighter but acts like a cliche antipolitical soldier. She is supposedly a dutiful character instead of being an ambitious soldier/politician remaking the nation after a revolution. She is supposedly on a dead end job but serial dates the greatest public figures.

You can't reconcile these inconsistencies. Instead you try to insist that the extremely obvious analogies between Jews and Nazis on DS9 are somehow nonexistent if they are not literally exact, even though no one said they were.

When people talk about a relatable character, they (mostly) mean someone they identify with, not because they're consistent or realistic, but because they embody their wish fulfilment self, or wish fulfilment friend, or wish fulfilment lover. And when they make such crazy arguments to supposedly show consistency and realism, they're exhibiting the symptoms of denial.
 
I'll be skipping over the rest of stj's posts which is 1) repetitive, 2) has already been proven wrong, 3) beside the point (mostly all three at the same time)...



I've also noted that the Dominion is analogous to the USSR, which did not come to blows with the US and UK!
Silliest analogy in this thread, by far. At least you could have compared Dominion to the Third Reich - that might have made some sense (powerful, expansionist force bent on conquering the known world, and driven by paranoia and a belief in racial superiority).

Your problem is that you can't make any useful comparisons between Kira, her religion and her personal history with anything besides Nazis and Jews.

The Occupation of Bajor bears a number of similarities to real-world events. When the Occupation, as well as the Bajorans themselves, were introduced in TNG: "Ensign Ro", the Bajorans appeared to be refugees who fled their homes and lived in refugee camps, giving rise to the belief that they were intended to resemble Palestinians who had once lived in Israel. The claim that the Occupation had lasted approximately forty years would also be consistent with the period between Israel's independence (1948) and the airing of the episode (1991). As the race was developed in later episodes, however, this allusion seemed to fade.

The Occupation, as portrayed in later episodes, appears to have been more a metaphor for the aggression of Germany and Japan in the first half of the 20th century. Although fans often liken the Occupation to Nazi Germany's treatment of Jews, there does not appear to have been a concerted effort – with the exception of individuals such as Gul Darhe'el (DS9: "Duet") – to exterminate the race. Rather, the Cardassians simply viewed themselves as superior, believing the Occupation was necessary for the good of the Cardassian Empire.

One could thus argue the Occupation was more akin to Japan's occupation of Korea and particularly China. For example, Marritza's vivid description of how Darhe'el's men murdered the Bajoran workers is reminiscent of both Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire, but his statements about "need[ing] your resources" and Dukat's description of the brutal massacres as "alleged improprieties" point strongly at Japan. The brutal treatment of other races under Japanese rule around the time of World War II and subsequent denial of events like the "Rape of Nanking" (the brutality of which is disputed in Japan to this day, although there was also a large degree of Holocaust denial in post-World War II Germany) bear many similarities to the way military leaders on Cardassia were celebrated for their deeds during the Occupation while most civilians were oblivious to its true nature.

Another World War II parallel one might make is to the Soviet occupation of the Baltic states in 1940–41 and 1944–91. Superficially, of course, the length of these occupations is roughly the same as that of Bajor, but the parallels go much further. For instance, the resistance movements of the Baltic states were active far beyond the end of World War II. Known as the Forest Brothers, they continued to engage the Soviet occupation forces well into the 1950s. The tactics of these actions – sabotage, assassinations of officials, and guerrilla warfare in the countryside – bears a striking resemblance to the Bajoran Resistance. However, perhaps the most interesting parallel is that of post-occupation events. Just like Bajor sought to enter into the Federation, the Baltic states were quick and eager to join NATO as a security measure against renewed aggression from Russia. And just like the discovery of the Bajoran wormhole created a geopolitical and strategic hot spot, so are the Baltic states strategically important to Russia, as their sovereignty severely limits Russian access to the Baltic Sea. Parallels to the ever present hostility between Bajorans and Cardassians even after the Occupation can also be made, considering the harsh laws of citizenship and official language, adopted by the post-occupation Baltic states.

Additionally, the Occupation bears some resemblances to European colonialism. Dukat's recollection of the Occupation in DS9: "Waltz" is heavily reminiscent of Kipling's "The White Man's Burden": "They couldn't see that if they had only chosen to cooperate with us, we could've turned their world into a paradise. ... We did not choose to be the superior race, fate handed us our role. The d'jarra caste system (DS9: "Accession") also brings to mind British occupation of India (British Raj). Like Bajor, India had a strict caste system prior to British arrival, and like the Bajorans, the Indian people officially abolished the system once colonial rule was ended.
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Talk:Occupation_of_Bajor



Because the show always prioritized its internal universe over real-world parallels, it's impossible to pin Deep Space Nine down to a single interpretation. "The Darkness and the Light" is almost certainly recalling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but in "Duet," the occupation is likened to the Holocaust, with Kira's interrogation of a suspected war criminal recalling similar interrogations of former Nazis in the 50s and 60s. In "Past Prologue," meanwhile, the strained relationship between extreme and less-extreme resistance groups recalls the situation in Northern Ireland. From the Cardassian point of view, the occupation of Bajor has parallels with the American presence in Vietnam, especially when it comes to Ziyal's difficult situation as a mixed-race child. On the other hand, Cardassian attitudes toward the Bajoran's have the hint of colonialism about them, and most particularly of Apartheid, and I think there's an argument to be made that Dukat's fraught relationship with the Bajorans is reminiscent of the slave-owner, who hates his slaves because he sees hatred in their eyes and knows that he deserves it, and punishes them for his depravity. The Vedek who kills herself in "Rocks and Shoals" to protest the Dominion's occupation of Bajor is probably a reference to the self-immolating monks in Tibet, and the notion of 'comfort women' for the Cardassian occupiers, which is introduced in "Wrongs Darker Than Death or Night," as well as the Bajorans' disdain for them, is probably derived from similar attitudes during Nazi occupation of European countries, and in fact that entire episode has undertones of Vichy France. And then there are episodes, like "Cardassians," which tell stories that could never have occurred have on Earth, but are entirely organic to the show's setting.

The result of Deep Space Nine's broad spectrum of political references is not merely to strengthen the show's fictional setting, but to render it universal and extend its relevance, so that a show written in the early to mid-nineties still has something important to say about the present-day political landscape, in spite of the upheavals it has undergone over the last decade.
http://www.indopedia.org/Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine.html



The most prominent theme in the series is that of the deeply religious Bajoran people attempting to rebuild their world and their economy after years of oppression from Cardassia. The relationship between the Bajorans and the Cardassians is intentionally portrayed much like the relationship between the Slavic people and Nazi Germany; the Cardassians had put the Bajorans to work in forced slave labor camps under terrible conditions, killed them with impunity, and express regret that their actions aren't recognized as being for the good of Bajor. Deep Space Nine's first officer, Kira Nerys, was formerly an underground resistance leader responsible for many acts of sabotage and subversion and is required in her new role to learn diplomacy and patience.

The relationship between the Cardassians and the Bajorans can also be regarded as colonial in nature. Much like in Kipling's The White Man's Burden, the Cardassians believed themselves to be both technologically and culturally superior. According to Dukat, at the time of first contact, Cardassia was at least 400 years ahead of Bajor in every way. The Cardassians strip-mined Bajor and instituted forced labor camps under the guise of civilizing a lesser people. Guerilla tactics by Bajoran fighters led to the removal of their colonial shackles in the same way that many colonies gained their independence in the 1960s and 1970s.
http://wrongquestions.blogspot.com/2008/01/back-through-wormhole-part-iv-looking.html

Note also that the TNG portrayal of the Bajorans is pretty much the closest thing I can think of to a mainstream American portrayal of a pro-Palestinian point of view (I think DS9 wound up sort of downplaying the allegory, but it was pretty clear in the original presentation).
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/07/i-am-properly-addressed-as-ensign-ro.php



Star Trek: Another franchise that gets things terribly wrong, but never the less, serves a critical function of science fiction; it covers modern sensitive ethical dilemmas in a fresh view of metaphor. You could probably teach ethics via Star Trek! In the sum of five series, I’ve seen them cover, to name a few, nuclear war, race relations, homosexuality, and the Israeli occupation of Palestine. (Re: the Cardassian occupation of Bajor on Deep Space Nine.)
http://astroguyz.com/2008/06/26/sci-fi-on-tv-movies-the-good-the-bad-the-alien-ugly/
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com
Star Trek: The Next Generation presents its take on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by introducing the dispute between Cardassians and the displaced Bajoran people, a dispute that would later become the basis of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Ever since the Cardassians annexed the Bajoran home world four decades prior, there has been trouble with terrorism, but now the terrorism is starting to affect Federation ships. Captain Picard has been ordered to find the Arafat-like rebel leader Orta (Jeffrey Hayenga), the man who's been blamed for the latest terrorist attack. Assigned to assist him on this mission is Ensign Ro (the surly and talented Michelle Forbes), a Bajoran ex-Starfleet officer who is hated by everyone because of an incident that happened when she was serving on the Wellington, where she disregarded orders and got several crew members killed. Of course, she's just as reluctant to serve on the Enterprise, but does so because it's better than prison--barely.
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Trek-Generation-Episode-Ensign/dp/630417957X

The episode also introduces the Bajorans and their conflict with the Cardassians. The story will be a focal point of the early DS9 episodes. It is only touched on here and in a couple other TNG episodes. I am just as much a fan of the pre-Dominion War DS9 episodes as when the main storyline took over the series, so I have to give credit to “Ensign Ro” for laying the groundwork. There is a lot of speculation who the Bajorans represent: Jews in the ’40’s, Palestinians, Kurds, or even gypsies. Their status in historical context is not the main focus of the episode, so the social commentary is not as heavy-handed as one might expect Trek to indulge in.
http://jeffords.blogspot.com/2009/10/star-trek-next-generation-ensign-ro.html


Cardassians- Nazi Germany (Mostly in regards to their Occupation of Bajor. But in some regards it is what would have happened if WW 2 was a stalemate instead of an allied victory.)

* Bajorans- Jewish/ Palestinian (Specifically the very religious people suffering through an oppressive military force. Though Cardassians are certainly never, ever Israeli)
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StarTrek

^ Amusing comment, that last one.

It is never made clear whether the Cardassians are more "authoritarian" (e.g., like the more typical Western colonial administration of "backward" lands), or "totalitarian" (e.g., like the occupation of Poland by Nazi Germany during World War II). The more "reactionary" Bajorans, however, are predictably condemned, as for example in an episode that alluded to a Bajoran "racist" organization, who wanted "off-worlders off Bajor." Kai Wynn, one of the leading "traditionalists," was shown as increasingly, outrightly, evil. The liberal stereotypes about the Jerry Falwells of our own world were thereby again vindicated. The Bajorans were also termed in current-day chatter about the show as "the Palestinians of the 24th century" -- a comment that caused some embarrassment, taking into account the analogous identity of the rather hideous and evil Cardassian occupiers.
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0509/0509startrekp1.htm


I know that a lot of time we as viewers, and Trek itself, uses Nazism as its reference point for its narratives of occupation, oppression, genocide, inhuman political actions, etc. But i'd like to reference something closer to home and the American experience than the German Nazism: American chattel slavery and post-emancipation defacto segregation.

I'd imagine you are aware that many, many slaveholders sired children through their female slaves. That women and girls were routinely raped and/or made proto "comfort women". That many were forced to raise or serve as nursemaids for the illegitimate children of slaveholders. This stuff was pretty much par for the course, and contrary, to the often reflexive anthropology employed among many liberal/rationalist types, these violators of women's bodies were not simply uneducated hicks and rednecks who were merely acting by impulse and a kind of wild-eyed non-thinking racism, but often wealthy, and well-heeled persons who were acting within accepted social mores of their particular society - even the mores accepted within "polite society" (one manifestation of this was that teenage sons of slaveholders were expected to "sow their wild oats" with slave girls and eventually, create offspring with them, although of course those offspring could never be treated like full children). Slavery was above else, a system of economic exploitation, one that mde many of its participants very, very wealthy.

And the various rationales to the ongoing sexual exploitation of black females: not only that they were the property of their owners, yes, but also that by doing this, they were actually doing the slaves a kind of existential favor, since their were children would now have the "privilege" of having white blood, lighter skin, more caucasian hair and facial features, etc. In fact, just the fact that a white man touched the slaves and took sexual interest in them was supposed to be an unmitigated good, since of course white blood was inherently superior to that of blacks. Remember that during that time, there was a entire social, political, and historical paradigm that deemed blacks as not only subhuman, but also incapable of building and/or maintaining any kind of civilization or lasting achievements. Africans were deemed to have the an intellectual, social and moral capacity as just about that of apes. Thus, slave women - as well as the men who watched as their wives and daughters were brutalized, kidnapped and made, umm, comfort women - were deemed as fortunate to have to have their captors take interest in them, and "purify" their "inferior" blood.

Of course, whenever these kinds of behaviors are deeply integrated into any kind of cultural landscape, those who have been victimized by that system can also become victimizers, and kind of perversely take on the logic of their oppressors, yet another variation of "Stockholm Syndrome". Thus, there became a fair number of black slaveholders, who were sometimes known to engage in the same practices as their white progenitors in that system. A good narrative telling of this phenomenon is in the novel and film "The Color Purple". In that fim (and obviously, the novel) the character played by Danny Glover ("Mister"), is pretty much, in most ways, a beast, though even HE is given some grey, some color to his character (and has what is in my opinion one of the most sublime and moving redemption for the character towards the end). Note that he treats the Whoopi Goldberg character ("Celie") in a perfunctory manner, there for his own use (though at times, the film shows that there can be a strange emotional connection and even functional alliance between the two); he verbally abuses and degrades the Oprah Winfrey character ("Sophia"), he flatters and lies to the Margaret Avery character ("Shug Avery") - and oh, he RAPES the Akosua Busia character ("Nettie", the younger sister of Celie). He also sires two of her children, and then sends her away. All the while, he's acting in ways that could be accepted in polite society, and in ways that were inherited tradition/ritual in the South during that time. Cardassia, anyone?

I've also known someone like this in my own family - my grandfather. He was born and reared in the South - and most definitely inherited many of the worst inclinations of his society. He was a philanderer: as with many women from her generation, black and white, my grandmother was forced to tolerate his various extramarital "affairs" and wanderings. He was something of a pedophile - targeting pubescent girls as soon as they started umm, "blooming". He could be verbally cruel - he would target enemies and opposers, perceived and otherwise, with a high degree of vitriol and viciuousness, so as to reduce them to tears.

And oh yes, he was a rapist - though not of the "hide-in-the-bushes-and-wait-to-the woman-is-home-alone" sort. No, he was what was known as an acquaintance rapist, often using charm and charisma and emotional manipulation to cause his prey to be trusting, or at least feel "safe" with him before he performed his despicable acts. Dukat, anyone?

Yet, according to many who knew him (including one of his past "conquests") he was also given to exceptional charisma, wit and often, an uncanny ability to navigate and make the most of various social, political and military circles (among, other things he was a decorated WWII vet). He was fairly well-spoken, and, even within the racist circles he often encountered, was often able to obtain positions of influence and acclaim within his community and some social organizations. Heck, he was even given to organizing all kinds of "good works" for the communities in which he lived, organizing block parties and gift giveaways to the various children within the community, who would then, along with their grateful families of course, shower him with adoration and affirmation. Sound like anyone?

Know what else? Both my mother and her sister have said that he NEVER touched them sexually and was, in many ways, a loving, protective father, though his actions against their mother and others (he could have a vicious temper) certainly created a lot of emotional instability which even today has had residual effects. And my mom told me that she knew that he would go postal if anyone had ever laid a hand a hand on her or my aunt - and in fact once almost killed a man who attempted to do just that. And despite their despising of the things he had done, my mom and her sister (along with my three uncles) most certainly loved their father. He was, after all, their father.

Ziyal, anyone?
http://trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=3349967&postcount=79
 
Last edited:
When people talk about a relatable character, they (mostly) mean someone they identify with, not because they're consistent or realistic, but because they embody their wish fulfilment self, or wish fulfilment friend, or wish fulfilment lover. And when they make such crazy arguments to supposedly show consistency and realism, they're exhibiting the symptoms of denial.

I don't know if your post was in direct response to me, but it appears so, and I'll operate under that assumption until you state otherwise.

As a point of fact, I stated early on that I didn't personally identify or relate with Kira. I find your persistent condescension that anyone who disagrees with you is engaging in self-denial in service of childish wish-fulfillment to be insulting.

You're left with a character who is supposedly devout, but doesn't think about her religion, even when she meets the Emissary!

When she first meets Sisko, he’s not the Emissary of the Prophets, but simply a Federation officer with motives she’s unable to trust. Nevertheless, she manages to express her personal belief that the Kai (a religious figure much more analogous to the Pope than any figure in Judaism that I can think of, but I’m the first to admit I’m no religious scholar) is the only person who can keep Kira’s newly freed nation state united.

And, once Sisko is named the Emissary, is it honestly unbelievable or surprising to you that his early conversations with Kira on the subject of Bajoran faith would be awkward and brief? Sisko is extremely uncomfortable with his newly ordained title, believes the Prophets to be intelligent aliens, and is unfamiliar with the Bajoran faith he is supposed to be leading. What possible conversation could Kira and Sisko have beyond those depicted on screen?

She is supposedly a civilian turned resistance fighter but acts like a [cliché] antipolitical soldier.

Several others have expressed fine arguments justifying this behavior, but it’s obvious you’re so entrenched in your own ideology that you wouldn't even consider them.

You can't reconcile these inconsistencies. Instead you try to insist that the extremely obvious analogies between Jews and Nazis on DS9 are somehow nonexistent if they are not literally exact, even though no one said they were.

Nobody here has categorically denied the similarities as you claim. You, on the other hand, seem rather insistent that the parallels of your reading are the only possible interpretation of the text. DevilEyes has been gracious enough to provide a great wealth of other, well reasoned interpretations.

So, stj, what d’ya got?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top