• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Least Relatable Character?

I'm tempted to say Captain Sisko. While I think he was very well acted

:lol:
:guffaw:

Come to think of it, Sisko would be fairly high on my list of unrelatables. Maybe it's down to the writing or Avery's performance, but for someone with such rich emotional backstory and further potential (relationship with Jake), he was just near impossible to get with. And the whole thing about making him a god at the end was bloody stupid.
 
I have to agree with Dennis: Riker.

Whenever anybody - and I know there are lots of you, so please do forgive me - talks about how much he or she likes Riker, how much he enjoys the character, how that character is his favorite character on TNG or even in all Trek, I am sincerely and utterly baffled.

I think to myself, "How can you like somebody who's such a caricature?"

I have never met anybody in real life like Riker. Ever. I've met lots of people, mostly guys, who would like to be like Riker or who would like to think they are like Riker, but the character is such a stereotype that I never felt as though I knew him at all. Most of the other major characters, even Kirk - who is not a big favorite of mine but who Riker is often compared to - became far more complicated as the years went by, but Riker? No.

So how can I like him or dislike him? It would be kind of like liking or disliking a GI Joe action figure. Or a cardboard cutout.

Yes, that's right: I can relate far better to a sentient blob of goo like Odo - or an android like Data or a sentient hologram like the Doctor or an empath like Troi or a human being who becomes a Prophet like Sisko - than I can to Riker. And the reason is, the writers gave me enough information so that I can at least understand something about those characters. Not so with Riker.

Edit: Harry Kim might come in second, now that I think about it. We didn't get to know him, either. He was pretty much used by the writers as a prop.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with Dennis: Riker.

Whenever anybody - and I know there are lots of you, so please do forgive me - talks about how much he or she likes Riker, how much he enjoys the character, how that character is his favorite character on TNG or even in all Trek, I am sincerely and utterly baffled.

I think to myself, "How can you like somebody who's such a caricature?"

I have never met anybody in real life like Riker. Ever. I've met lots of people, mostly guys, who would like to be like Riker or who would like to think they are like Riker, but the character is such a stereotype that I never felt as though I knew him at all. Most of the other major characters, even Kirk - who is not a big favorite of mine but who Riker is often compared to - became far more complicated as the years went by, but Riker? No.

So how can I like him or dislike him? It would be kind of like liking or disliking a GI Joe action figure. Or a cardboard cutout.

Yes, that's right: I can relate far better to a sentient blob of goo like Odo - or an android like Data or a sentient hologram like the Doctor or an empath like Troi or a human being who becomes a Prophet like Sisko - than I can to Riker. And the reason is, the writers gave me enough information so that I can at least understand something about those characters. Not so with Riker.

Edit: Harry Kim might come in second, now that I think about it. We didn't get to know him, either. He was pretty much used by the writers as a prop.

That may be the answer.
Riker is a type, but not a growing character. He instantly raises certain images in our mind and some are comfortable with that.
Like me and Dirk Pitt from the Clive Cussler novels. He follows a certain track each book, does things, says things you expect him tosay, and when they introduced his twin son and daughter, I lost interest.

Maybe he's a bit like McDonalds. The food there tastes pretty good so long as you don't compare it and enjoy it for what it is, and since we've had it before we know exactly what we're in for.
 
Neelix--nobody can be that happy and friendly.

Even though he was far from my favorite character, I can kind of relate to him. I've known some people like that- they spend their life stuck behind the eight ball, but have this amazingly upbeat attitude.

I can't relate to Data or the EMH. Despite what we're told, I see them as machines and/or sophisticated computer programming.
 
I have to agree with Dennis: Riker.

Whenever anybody - and I know there are lots of you, so please do forgive me - talks about how much he or she likes Riker, how much he enjoys the character, how that character is his favorite character on TNG or even in all Trek, I am sincerely and utterly baffled.

I think to myself, "How can you like somebody who's such a caricature?"

I have never met anybody in real life like Riker. Ever. I've met lots of people, mostly guys, who would like to be like Riker or who would like to think they are like Riker, but the character is such a stereotype that I never felt as though I knew him at all. Most of the other major characters, even Kirk - who is not a big favorite of mine but who Riker is often compared to - became far more complicated as the years went by, but Riker? No.
I wonder if the writers themselves ever realized how silly the scenes of Riker 'romancing' various guest stars usually looked. Come to think of it, post TNG, good guy characters who appeared to be something of a classic 'ladies man', or one you'd expect to be one, were portrayed as, for the most part, unsuccessful with women/unlucky in love (Bashir right until the finale and to a degree Paris before hooking up with B'Elanna). It looks almost as a subversion of if the ladykiller stererotype of Kirk and Riker.
 
I have to agree with Dennis: Riker.

Whenever anybody - and I know there are lots of you, so please do forgive me - talks about how much he or she likes Riker, how much he enjoys the character, how that character is his favorite character on TNG or even in all Trek, I am sincerely and utterly baffled.

I think to myself, "How can you like somebody who's such a caricature?"

I have never met anybody in real life like Riker. Ever. I've met lots of people, mostly guys, who would like to be like Riker or who would like to think they are like Riker, but the character is such a stereotype that I never felt as though I knew him at all. Most of the other major characters, even Kirk - who is not a big favorite of mine but who Riker is often compared to - became far more complicated as the years went by, but Riker? No.
I wonder if the writers themselves ever realized how silly the scenes of Riker 'romancing' various guest stars usually looked. Come to think of it, post TNG, good guy characters who appeared to be something of a classic 'ladies man', or one you'd expect to be one, were portrayed as, for the most part, unsuccessful with women/unlucky in love (Bashir right until the finale and to a degree Paris before hooking up with B'Elanna). It looks almost as a subversion of if the ladykiller stererotype of Kirk and Riker.
I think that's a good observation.

Though I bought it in "The Outcast." To someone from a world with virtually no men, and no one who would admit to being one, Riker must have looked pretty tasty.

I also liked that his one true love was, according to the telepathic holodeck insect dude in "Future Imperfect," a freakin' hologram, that he saw once. I think we learned a lot about him--he's the most shallow SOB in known space. :D
 
I have never met anybody in real life like Riker. Ever. I've met lots of people, mostly guys, who would like to be like Riker or who would like to think they are like Riker, but the character is such a stereotype that I never felt as though I knew him at all.

I have. He's well on his way to being a self made millionaire by the age of 25. Extremely charismatic and lead-by-example manager. He collects unsolicited phone numbers from random women all the time, but isn't a "man-whore". He even played an instrument (guitar) so-so (and hardly ever in front of people) He's intelligent, in the street smart sense and has a work ethic that would kill most people. If he grew 6 inches taller and a beard, he'd be f'ing Riker.

Funny thing is you love a guy like that and hate the bastard at the same time.
 
Last edited:
ROM - They could not decide what to do with him. First he is stupid and whipped, then an engineer with no financial sense, and finally the financial leader of the Ferengi.
 
I wonder if the writers themselves ever realized how silly the scenes of Riker 'romancing' various guest stars usually looked. Come to think of it, post TNG, good guy characters who appeared to be something of a classic 'ladies man', or one you'd expect to be one, were portrayed as, for the most part, unsuccessful with women/unlucky in love (Bashir right until the finale and to a degree Paris before hooking up with B'Elanna). It looks almost as a subversion of if the ladykiller stererotype of Kirk and Riker.

Good observation. As for your initial question, I doubt it. I could of course be wrong, but I think when they were having Riker act like the poor woman's Cary Grant (who had more sex appeal in his pinky finger than Riker had in his entire body, BTW) or James Bond or whatever he was supposed to be, they honestly believed he was alluring.

And apparently he was to some, since he has lots of female fans, including some very nice and smart women here on the BBS. But me? I either was embarrassed for the guy or just repulsed. I mean, euw. Euw, euw, euw.

Though I bought it in "The Outcast." To someone from a world with virtually no men, and no one who would admit to being one, Riker must have looked pretty tasty.

True - and there (if I'm remembering correctly, but it's been a long time since I've seen that episode) he wasn't so gung-ho, pull-out-all-the-stops, come-on-strong, ladies'-man "charming" as he usually was with women. He was a lot more...tentative, I think. More restrained for sure. So it was a lot less yucky than usual, at least for me.

I also liked that his one true love was, according to the telepathic holodeck insect dude in "Future Imperfect," a freakin' hologram, that he saw once. I think we learned a lot about him--he's the most shallow SOB in known space. :D

:lol:

I have. He's well on his way to being a self made millionaire by the age of 25. Extremely charismatic and lead-by-example manager. He collects unsolicited phone numbers from random women all the time, but isn't a "man-whore". He even played an instrument (guitar) so-so (and hardly ever in front of people) He's intelligent, in the street smart sense and has a work ethic that would kill most people. If he grew 6 inches taller and a beard, he'd be f'ing Riker.

Funny thing is you love a guy like that and hate the bastard at the same time.

But the thing is...your friend isn't the image of Riker. He's the (significantly shorter and clean-shaven ;) ) image of what the writers wanted Riker to be. But Riker, or Frakes, just didn't pull it off, at least not so that it was convincing to me (or, apparently, to DevilEyes).

Riker was supposed to be charismatic and lead-by-example, but to me he always seemed like a by-the-book, my-way-or-the-highway stiff. He was supposed to be the kind of man who attracted women like honey attracts bees, but my reaction to him is and always was "Oh, please. Get over yourself, Romeo." We were supposed to think he was intelligent, we were told that he was, but he came across as not much better than average.

And by the way, I am partial to very masculine men, so you'd think I would be prime Riker fodder. But no. And the reason was that it all seemed like an act. I like the real thing, not somebody pretending to be the real thing. And that's what Riker always came across as - a big ol' faker, a guy trying to prove to everybody what a lady killer he is.

Edit: Ooh, and I agree that there were always big problems with Rom, SFRabid. He's another character than the writers used like a prop, to be whatever they needed him to be at any given time.
 
Last edited:
Despite all the characters in Star Trek so different from us - a robot, a girl with a 7 year lifespan, emotionless aliens, the character I thought that was least easy to relate to and least realistic was Captain Janeway.
I mean they really did a number on her character, nothing she did really made sense? I was never convinced that a real human being would act like her given her situation.
I also think the situation was exacerbated a small bit by Mulgrew's slightly distant acting, her model posing and over the top gestures.

So who for you is the character you can least relate to?

I'm not sure how a robot that wants to grow old and die could be more relatably realistic than, well, pretty much any character imaginable. The thing is obviously broken.

As far as not making sense and not fitting the alleged situation, Kira Nerys is probably the Grand Champion.

Most people mean by "relatable" someone they themselves would like to be, or be friends with, or have sex with. And, "realism" is only mentioned because it's less self revelatory. In practice, the criterion of "realism" is about as meaningless as the "dull" standard.
 
ro_laren.jpg


^ Bing!

Worst.... Character..... E'var.

I'm glad she didn't continue in the TNG series for very long. They did better with the angry, fighting Bajoran with Major Kira.
 
Most people mean by "relatable" someone they themselves would like to be, or be friends with, or have sex with.

I can't speak for everybody, but this isn't what "relatable" means to me. I take it literally: Somebody I can relate to, somebody whose motivations I understand and sympathize with. I don't have to agree with the character necessarily, but I do have to understand him at least to a certain degree. And I probably have to like the character, too, even if I don't agree with everything the character does.
 
Last edited:
To Emna:

Well to each their own, but I felt the series could have done without her antics or character. It all just seemed like her character was slapped in the middle somewhere to be story filler.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top