Perhaps their lack of hair and subsequent rapid re-growth of hair in this era is simply "a subject they do not discuss with outsiders??"
L’rell. Because they’re worth it.
Perhaps their lack of hair and subsequent rapid re-growth of hair in this era is simply "a subject they do not discuss with outsiders??"
L'Rell is different beyond just the hair. I think they are using her real lips unfettered by latex now. They look way less full.
I think they were changing the make up in general as season 1 went along. So no surprise they continued to do that into season 2. They still have the overall look they had in season but perhaps less of the material or layers or they're producing it a different way.L'Rell is different beyond just the hair. I think they are using her real lips unfettered by latex now. They look way less full.
All it took was hair?Well. It seems they did what I wished they would do. They look like Klingons now.![]()
Yes. The lack of hair was the biggest issue. Klingons are famed for their luscious locks.All it took was hair?
The makeup is still identical.
Yes, as established in many, many, threads, hair is the quintessential facet of Star Trek aliens that make or break a design. No variation is acceptable.All it took was hair?
The makeup is still identical.
I love it. Klingons are just slaves to styling trends. 2256, the year shaved heads was THE hot look! In 25 years, will the Klingons look back on this period as we look back on The Rachel today?
I'm going to say this helps canon for me. It makes it less strange that Worf spent so many years on TNG putting curlers in every morning, if the Klingons are actually a warrior-and-fashionista race.
"Always go into battle looking your best."
"Always go into battle looking your best."
Thank you! That's exactly my point!Design variations in the Klingons is perfectly ok with me. We have humans who are white, black, asian, hispanic, etc. Individual with hair, without hair, etc. Humanity is a wide range of varying cultures. So why not the klingons too?
Long hair is actually shit for warriors. Makes it much easier to subdue someone by grabbing a lock of their hair. And it can just get tangled in shit. And it can get in your eyes. Basically there's a reason the Romans came up with the idea of soldiers with closely-cropped hair.
Of course, maybe Klingon hair doesn't work like ours. It may come out very easily if yanked violently, meaning it's not as much of a disadvantage. And Klingon hair is at least never in their eyes due to their honking forheads and lack of a part.
Long hair is actually shit for warriors. Makes it much easier to subdue someone by grabbing a lock of their hair. And it can just get tangled in shit. And it can get in your eyes. Basically there's a reason the Romans came up with the idea of soldiers with closely-cropped hair.
Of course, maybe Klingon hair doesn't work like ours. It may come out very easily if yanked violently, meaning it's not as much of a disadvantage. And Klingon hair is at least never in their eyes due to their honking forheads and lack of a part.
I think long hair is cool and short hair really isn't.
The Klingons -- post-TOS -- were modeled after Samurai, who have long hair. Of course, theirs was tied back. Maybe Klingons move so well their enemies can't grab them. I don't know. I'm biased. I think long hair is cool and short hair really isn't.
I have very short hair, to the point that if I wear anything with the military on it I'm asked if I served.I have really short hair. I should now engage in mock outrage directed at you.
That made me think of this for some stupid reason..."Always go into battle looking your best."
Insert music from The Donna Reed Show into the background.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.