Something like this?Hm, somehow I feel that sweptback pylons might work bette with the overall line of the shuttle. Other than that I think you're on the right track here!
I get you, let me have a look... Will need to build a new pylon as it angles, but that's no problemo...No, I mean have the lower part angle backwards. It is now angled forward. If that makes sense....
I get you, let me have a look... Will need to build a new pylon as it angles, but that's no problemo...
Thank you, it's an evolving thing at the moment - I may redo the hull again, still not happy with the shape of it. It's close...I know it was based on the Type-9 (perhaps this is the Type-9a, in the LD fashion??) but I get real 'Alice' vibes from the shape and design of the fore, while the top-view gives it a Jem'Hadar feel, with the 'tail' structure on the aft.
Looking forward to seeing how this design continues to evolve!
Here you go -
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I like it, so I'm running with it :-)
More tomorrow.
Star Trek has a history of not doing that. It's a case of what ever can be built as a live action set is used. The TNG Type 7 shuttle was impossible to build (then) as an external set, so we got the simple type 15 shuttlepod. The Type 6 shuttle only happened because of the new shuttle exterior built for TFF. The Type 8 and 9 introduced in VOY were variations on a theme, as was the type 10 seen in a single episode of DS9. The shuttle pod introduced for the Defiant was more akin to something required by a smaller ship (which the Delphis is not). So going with a generic body shape is not breaking anything, IMOOShuttles should resemble their parent craft…
Indeed!And now we have shuttles. Cool.![]()
Thank you! I might - might - get the shuttle finished today and then... production renders :-)That's coming along really nicely!! Great work as always!
Thank you!^^ What he said!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.