• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

It bothers me of how much corruption there is within Starfleet.

I never said that Star Trek implied that humans had become biologically superior, it's their society that's evolved. And Deep Space Nine backs me up on this, pointing out that 'it's easy to be a saint in paradise'.
Yes, and DS9 also brought in non-Federation people. Cardassians who were far from saints, the Maquis who the audience could sympathize with to some extent but were not exactly saints either, Bajorans who were mostly pretty nice but could be awfully opinionated and stubborn, Odo and the Ferengi who definitely had their own agendas, and then we got to the Dominion races. Plenty of potential conflicts there.
 
Much of the corruption we have seen in Starfleet could be viewed as “noble cause” corruption.
Keneally and even Dougherty were not trying to enrich themselves but were duped (more or less) into their actions.Perhaps their downfalls could be attributed to hubris more than corruption.
The Matalas era shows however are hinting at a wider ,more ingrained kind of malaise in the UFP,what with crime syndicates and shanty towns and the like.I sure don’t like this direction.
 
The Matalas era shows however are hinting at a wider ,more ingrained kind of malaise in the UFP,what with crime syndicates and shanty towns and the like.I sure don’t like this direction.
Thankfully I'm pretty sure Freecloud and M'talas Prime are both way outside the Federation.
 
I'm usually the last person to defend Matalas and his writing decisions but this sort of thing isn't without precedent - I remember TNG showing Qualor II (which definitely WAS within Federation territory) in "Unification II". That bar seemed to welcome quite a few shady characters.
 
The Matalas era shows however are hinting at a wider ,more ingrained kind of malaise in the UFP,what with crime syndicates and shanty towns and the like.I sure don’t like this direction.
"The Matalas era" consists of two seasons which derived much of its content from 90s Treks, including crime syndicates and shanty towns. Let's not pretend these are new concepts in Trek. Nothing in the so-called Matalas era can be considered new.
 
Much of the corruption we have seen in Starfleet could be viewed as “noble cause” corruption.
Keneally and even Dougherty were not trying to enrich themselves but were duped (more or less) into their actions.Perhaps their downfalls could be attributed to hubris more than corruption.
The Matalas era shows however are hinting at a wider ,more ingrained kind of malaise in the UFP,what with crime syndicates and shanty towns and the like.I sure don’t like this direction.
I mean, we saw the shadiness begin with Leyton and Pressman who went above and beyond their authority in the name of security.

Plus, we've seen more than a few wayward colonies in the TNG era, like the one Yar was from, or Jason Vigo. Or even "Captain's Holiday" were theft is occuring in a resort planet.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top