CBS should not be happy because of Netflix footing the bill, obviouslyAnd how does this in any way, change the meaning of the word, "happy", in my post?

CBS should not be happy because of Netflix footing the bill, obviouslyAnd how does this in any way, change the meaning of the word, "happy", in my post?
Since Star Trek views time travel as a Big Giant Reset Button/Get Out of Jail Free Card, thereby removing all consequence from the story they wasted lots of time telling, yes. Zero is fine.You mean zero time traveling?
And how does this in any way, change the meaning of the word, "happy", in my post?
So what?
Removing time travel would remove half of the good stories of Star Trek. Half of the good original movies are gone, half of the good JJ movies are gone, half of the good episodes are gone. Even the Temporal Cold War, as annoying as the concept was, brought the only episodes in the first Enterprise season that weren't a complete bore, and ended up exposing the Vulcans struggling with their own arrogance throughout the rest of the series better than it would have otherwise.Since Star Trek views time travel as a Big Giant Reset Button/Get Out of Jail Free Card, thereby removing all consequence from the story they wasted lots of time telling, yes. Zero is fine.
Rather than half, it's probably more like: about 1 time travel episode per season, per show, and per film series. And 90% of those aren't technically time travel episodes, but "temporal anomaly" episodes.
Since it was conceived of as an anthology story, I can't picture what they could possibly do in season 2. Will it just be Burnham that goes on? Burnham and Tilly? Many of the other characters aren't really compatible with a second story.
In general, I'm the opposite. I love me a 'Time Squared', 'Cause and Effect', 'Yesterday's Enterprise' or 'All Good Things' much more than a costume drama like 'Times Arrow' or 'Future's End'. ST:FC is an obvious exception but I think that was helped by the fact that the time they visited was also in our future.Good distinction...because when I think about it, I generally like time travel episodes but really dislike the temporal anomoly episodes.
The practical answer to this is always: one too many.
What would be great is if we experienced some type of leap backwards in time where STD was never even created (zero seasons).As title said, how many seasons of Discovery do you think will be produced?
After viewing the first 9 episodes, I'm oriented for 3 or 4 seasons.
Would you replace it, or be content without a series?What would be great is if we experienced some type of leap backwards in time where STD was never even created (zero seasons).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.