• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How big was the Enterprise?

If that is the way it is done then that is the way you must do it. And also what they did for TMP.
Obviously, the solution for TAS is to put the outside nubs at 10 and 2 so they're symmetrical, and have the bridge pointed directly to port on the inside.
 
What does baffle me is why almost every deck plan I've ever seen feels the need to offset the turbolift on the Bridge.
When Kirk looked at the 3-footer in "Requiem for Methuselah," they showed his eyes peering straight in...


...and this is the reverse angle they chose:


Kirk couldn't really see inside the bridge, but this shot might be the show officially saying that the bridge is offset, with the elevator directly aft and the Command Module pointing toward the port bow. Because they knew full well where the elevator nub was on the miniature.

They could just as easily have chosen and angle like this, but they didn't:

This is a damn nice one, I wish they'd done it more than once:
 
We know the main viewscreen is essentially a camera and not a window. So while it was interesting to see Kirk’s face on the viewscreen we know he wasn’t actually looking into the bridge.
 
It's not about TOS specifically, it's about television.

Where does the music come from, and why are the ships brightly lit in deep deep space? Why is there sound in space? Why is up seemingly universal in Trekland? Why do ships never move as if in a vacuum? Where is the line where it has to be taken literally and seriously and where do you say it's a fantasy I'm enjoying on my TV and those things don't matter?
The entertainment part is the most important. I take what I see on screen seriously but not fully literally. Why? Because there are limits to the dramatic presentation format.
 
Who says the other door by the main view screen is a turbo lift? If power goes out it would make more sense for it just to be an emergency access to a gangway leading down to the next deck.
The turbolift wall detail & curvature is a strong indicator of the artists' intentions (although also minmal enough to be something else if required)
Us8Ev26.jpg
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
A few years ago we had a member who was fitting the curved set corridor we associate with the saucer into the engineering hull. He was making deck plans how they appeared on screen.
 
fly by night made a whole video about how the captain should have large, ostentatious, quarters taking up the back of the areola, based entirely on 18th century British Royal Navy whatsit, which i thought was odd.
 
My two quatloos worth is that if you go with Matt Jefferies intention, an eight-deck saucer (with deck five being the main deck) works fine for ~947 ft. length, but if you go with an eleven-deck saucer from the writer's guide and as implied in various episodes (with deck seven being the main deck) then a 1080 ft. length would probably work better. YMMV.
 
Last edited:
fly by night made a whole video about how the captain should have large, ostentatious, quarters taking up the back of the areola, based entirely on 18th century British Royal Navy whatsit, which i thought was odd.
He did place some real significance towards 'magnificence' and importance in creating and maintaining the Captain's Command Aura(it had a definite British slant... but the dude is British to begin with).

But then, there's real practicality to the idea if not the scope. Consider the 18th Century(and if we're being fair, even further back in time), where the rear was probably the safest place to house your Captain and Main Officers in the event of violent weather or battle. The Captain, if there is more than one deck of such accomodations, would be granted the topmost because it permits the best access to the quarterdeck and what-have-you. Deck 2 is the closest equivalent the 'classic' designs of the Enterprise, both TOS and the Movies, have for easiest access to the bridge.

As for size and shape, the areola itself from version to version provides a shape that just wasn't going to be useful when it came to studio production, as there was never enough genuine room for a 'unique' set of quarters isolated from the main assembly. And we all know the 'standard' quarters were designed to practically fit in a curved corridor. Hence why we only rarely got to see anything that wasn't connected to that curve- and often for only one time, maybe two if lucky.

That said, his proposed design for a 'Grand Cabin' on the Movie Enterprise didn't seem all that expansive or ostentatious for what it was. Even the dining room(ultimately twice the size of the actual Day-Cabin on set) failed to look overly excessive thanks to the shape of the areola dictating terms.
 
A few years ago we had a member who was fitting the curved set corridor we associate with the saucer into the engineering hull. He was making deck plans how they appeared on screen.
That is me. My WIP engineering hull deck plans have curved corridors for a 947 foot ship. (Working on a sketch to show you soon - I hope).

Mike McMaster. :)
McMaster only calls it a "Secondary Exit/Entry" and never shows a turbolift behind the door, so, it may only be a gangway to stairs or a ladder. :shrug:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top