Starships don't actually have to float...so it can be.That Duranium is very dense...![]()
Starships don't actually have to float...so it can be.That Duranium is very dense...![]()
The weight is also completely different. Notice that I say "weight ", and not "mass". The USS Enterprise NCC-1701 '" displaces"' 190,000 versus the displacement of the USS Enterprise CVA-65.
1. Significantly denser alloys on outer hull that may withstand a glancing blow from an object while traveling at relativistic speeds as well as all manner of radiation, heat, and cold that one encounters in the vacuum of space.USS Enteprise (CV-6)
Displacement
May 1938 - October 1943
19,800 tons standard
25,500 tons full load
From October 1943:
21,000 tons standard
32,060 tons full load
USS Enterperise (CVN-65)
Displacement
93,284-long-tons (94,781 tonnes) full load
USS Enterprise (CVN-80)
Displacement (Projected)
About 100,000-long-tons (100,000 tonnes) full load
The USS Enterprise NCC-1701 weighs about 90,000 tons more than her carrier predecessor's. Where is all the extra weight coming from?
It's for when they hide the ship under waterYeah, I always cringe a little when they use "displacement" for a spaceship. Displacement indicates the amount of water pushed away when a ship is in it.
What is it displacing in a vacuum?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.