• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Have you ever given up on a Trek series? If so, what was the last straw for you?

Is that what happened? I think they were planned as fodder from the jump.
I remember reading Entertainment Weekly where the producers were saying that they were planning on introducing two new characters to the show who had supposedly been there from the beginning.

They were going to show up as background characters for a few episodes before getting their flashbacks, then they would be fully integrated into the cast as if they were always there.

I think the negative fan response was almost immediate from their first appearance and the producers realized that they had made a mistake and quickly wrote them out.​
 
The best part about Nikki and Paolo for me was that I only started watching the show with S3, so I didn't really have any idea what was going on with them I picked up S1 and S2 on DVD and when S3 had their hiatus I caught myself up and only then realized that N&P hadn't actually been there from the beginning (....or had they? :p ).

The whole thing completely jumbled my memories of what happened when on the show though, which somehow worked perfectly given the nature of the show itself (though it hadn't gotten to actual time travel yet).

The best part of that whole viewing order was that the beginning of S3 is generally considered the weakest part of the whole series, so I effectively got the worst part out of the way first.
 
A criticism of ENT that I read was that it had most every bit of tech TNG had, just termed slightly differently. "Phase Pistols" instead of Phasers, and "Polarized Hull Plating" instead of Shields.

If I remember correctly, Berman and Braga weren't planning on that. They really wanted more simple tech. But the studios wanted phase pistols and a transporter because it was more Star Trek.
 
We already have ablative armor and reactive armor. Maybe the ships could have had that kind of armored hull plating just much strong than what we have now. I do like the idea of transporters, but because of there being less computer power to keep track of all the neutrons and protons and the postions of the atoms kept it only as cargo transport. Food and medical suplies would have to be flown to the ship to prevent possible mutations. Proposed upgraded NX-01 with an engineering hull could also have introduced transporters that could safely transport organic tissue and introduced phasers.

The first few seasons would have had the Enterprise and all Earth ships running with their tail between the warp nacelles if they didn't have something in between the missles and photon torpedoes. However, since they could make a matter antimatter reactor, a photon torpedo could be possible. Someone in charge of weapons R&D could have had the thought: Hey, if we put a small amount of matter and an equal amount of antimatter into a warhead that'd be a a good weapon. Having a warp core would have lead to a photon torpedo rather quickly. We did it before, just backwards. We, humans, used nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945; the first nuclear reactor for power generation was just 10 years later in the USSR.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top