Lower Decks and Prodigy already proved those two things aren't mutually exclusive.Continuity is very important but so too is telling brand new stories to stop a franchise from stagnating.
Lower Decks and Prodigy already proved those two things aren't mutually exclusive.Continuity is very important but so too is telling brand new stories to stop a franchise from stagnating.
Already six feet under.It's not going anywhere.
The Kelvin Universe would have continued had they been managed better, which they weren't.And that word would be? The Kelvin movies are their own thing that ran their course and they have nothing to do with the conversation at hand. This is just a whataboutism. NuTrek has been going strong for 10 years.
Any new Dr Who episodes releasing recently?lmao no it didn't.
I love Beyond, but I also accept it was a big flop. Hence no more Kelvin movies. Simple as.Indeed. They went out on an optimistic note. Best of any of the film series honestly.
I love the film and don't care if it's a flop. It ended the story with a bang.Beyond, but I also accept it was a big flop. Hence no more Kelvin movies. Simple as.
Are you including TUC?Best of any of the film series honestly.
I am because TUC ends on a positive by also somber note. They are to report in for decommissioning at some point. The whole crew isn't even all together on the same bridge.Are you including TUC?
Ah, I see. You're using Doctor Who's current slump in popularity to discredit comments made by people in the 1970s and in 2010. Despite the fact the show has continued strongly since both times, and the individuals who made these comments have overseen the franchise when it was at its greatest heights, popularity wise. Granted, RTD is also in charge during the current slump, but that doesn't negate the positive impact he had on the franchise twenty years ago.Went out on a whimper.
So? It was a decades long success. Twice.Went out on a whimper.
And in 2005.Technically Star Trek went out on a whimper in both 1969 and 1974.
And that finale...Yep. ENT was at a creative peak, but the ratings were awful for a 2005 broadcast network.
And 2005Technically Star Trek went out on a whimper in both 1969 and 1974. It took the first plans for a Paramount broadcast network and the success of Star Wars to bring Trek back to the screen. Syndicated reruns were a runaway success, but that's not the same as new content.
The Doctor Who spin off The War Between the Land and the Sea recently debuted on BBC to decent ratings and, yes, there is a Christmas episode of Doctor Who in the works for 2026, after which the BBC has assured us the franchise will continue. Anyone who thinks this is a long break for Doctor Who doesn't know Doctor Who.Any new Dr Who episodes releasing recently?
and in 2016. At least the movie series. I liked Beyond , but it was a box office dudAnd in 2005.
And that finale...
And 2005
"We do not discuss it with outsiders."
All of you, kindly be quiet.and in 2016. At least the movie series. I liked Beyond , but it was a box office dud

It is the nature of life to have ups and downs. Constant upward trend is absurd.Technically Star Trek went out on a whimper in both 1969 and 1974. It took the first plans for a Paramount broadcast network and the success of Star Wars to bring Trek back to the screen. Syndicated reruns were a runaway success, but that's not the same as new content.
What glazing are you talking about? I just looked at youtube (general audience) and it's getting a hell of a lot more love than I would expect form a MCU product.QFT. Most modern writers don't know how to wrangle in the 'modern audience'.
Just look at the absolute glazing that's happening to the Cyclops trailer for Doomsday.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.