• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Drop the S31 show for a Captain Pike show?

Drop the Section 31 show for a the Pike show?

  • Yes, I want a Pike show, and do not want a Section 31 show.

    Votes: 124 55.9%
  • No, I want a Section 31 show, and do not want a show with Pike.

    Votes: 9 4.1%
  • I want a show that feature both Pike and crew on the Enterprise and Section 31 with Georgiou.

    Votes: 23 10.4%
  • I trust CBS to give me something I will like!

    Votes: 12 5.4%
  • I want to see both! as separate shows.

    Votes: 54 24.3%

  • Total voters
    222
When I go to watch "Star Trek", I go in expecting certain things. It goes with the territory of using the Star Trek moniker. If it isn't "Star Trek" then I'm likely to be disappointed, regardless of the quality. Much like if I order a cheeseburger and get a filet o' fish in my McDonald's bag. The filet o' fish may be great, but it isn't the cheeseburger I ordered.
What I'm trying to figure is what makes something not Star Trek, especially in current iteration.
 
I tend to think a spy show with an "end justify the means" outlook with a former space Hitler as the lead would put it outside the scope of Star Trek for me. Of course, YMMV.
I dont really understand comparing the Empress with Hitler.
 
I tend to think a spy show with an "end justify the means" outlook with a former space Hitler as the lead would put it outside the scope of Star Trek for me. Of course, YMMV.
I don't know if that's how the show going to go. I'll judge it then.
 
She killed a lot of people to maintain power. Maybe Stalin would be a better comparison?
She kind of strikes me like a Roman emperor, one of the more competent ones. Not necessarily a philosopher like Marcus Aurelius. She is willing to do a lot to maintain the Pax Terra, and an empire that does not expand, ultimately contracts. She'a haughty but not blindly so. Shes an Empress seemingly descended from a line of rulers that followed a code, though not one we'd recognize or agree with.

Hitler was an ignorant brat, amoral, with a limited world view who used easy answers, defenseless scapegoats, the divisions within his opposition, and a rebounding economy (that he wasn't responsible for) to forge a very brief powerful regime. That type seems to pop up more regularly than I'd like.
 
She kind of strikes me like a Roman emperor, one of the more competent ones. Not necessarily a philosopher like Marcus Aurelius. She is willing to do a lot to maintain the Pax Terra, and an empire that does not expand, ultimately contracts. She'a haughty but not blindly so. Shes an Empress seemingly descended from a line of rulers that followed a code, though not one we'd recognize or agree with.

Hitler was an ignorant brat, amoral, with a limited world view who used easy answers, defenseless scapegoats, the divisions within his opposition, and a rebounding economy (that he wasn't responsible for) to forge a very brief powerful regime. That type seems to pop up more regularly than I'd like.

We watched her execute her inner circle, destroy the Rebel compound, eat sapient beings. We know she took part in the genocide of the Talosians.

I think people are trying to twist who she is to make the idea of the show more palatable.
 
We have to permanently agree to disagree about Georgiou's redeem-ability. Arguing about a subject like this for years on end is not going to be an enjoyable experience. At best. At worst, it's going to start slowly driving people away.

A little bit earlier, I started having thoughts of, "The Hell with this." If I started thinking it, other people probably did.
 
Why would CBS want to stop developing a show starring international star Michelle Yeoh?
This. The appeal of a Section 31 show with Michelle Yeoh has much wider international appeal. A Pike show while might have a lot of talk among Trek fans is actually a limiting offering by comparison.

Personally I've had my fill of Pike. It was nice to see the character expanded. We know how he will end up in even greater detail now as well. Let him go and work on new characters and crews. Would a special here and there be nice? Yes but I don't want an ongoing series with the characters at this point. I want new offerings. I want Discovery to continue and to not have it's crew pushed into the background by bringing in new characters to command them.
 
Last edited:
We have to permanently agree to disagree about Georgiou's redeem-ability. Arguing about a subject like this for years on end is not going to be an enjoyable experience. At best. At worst, it's going to start slowly driving people away.

In an era of "there are good people on both sides", I'm not sure it sends a good message of having Space Stalin leading the intelligence arm of a supposed evolved Federation. YMMV.
 
I do not care for Section 31 at all. It was interesting on DS9, but after that... meh. Section 31 needs to remain mysterious not have a whole series about it.

I would love, love, love a Captain Pike show though!
 
I've also noticed however, that optimism itself is understood in very different ways among fans. I've seen the possible "fallen Federation" setting for Discovery's season 3 being dismissed as just like any other dystopian science fiction, and I'm just asking myself why Discovery couldn't be optimistic in that setting as well. If the story were about the ship rebuilding hope, the crew working together to make the world a better place and their efforts actually succeeding, it would be an optimistic message for me, dystopian setting aside.

That's "Star Wars".
The original ones. Despite the setting with the dystopian Empire, these were extremely uplifting and positive movies about personal and world-changing success.

"Star Trek" was always positivistic about the universe as a whole - world peace, end of hunger and disease - but could actually be extremely grim and realistic in the fates of individual characters - just look at Pike's accident or the various smaller tragedies Trek heroes went through.

Star Trek was never a fairy tale about individual success. But it always carried a message about how society as a whole can change into almost a paradise, if we just stop being assholes towards each other. That's why Star Wars had always more mainstream appeal, and why so many writers fail to capture the more abstract "Trek optimism".
 
Last edited:
Terran salutes do kind of resemble Nazi salutes.
vHgvNEE.jpg

In America, it was the Bellamy Salute
 
*sigh* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_salute

Seriously, the whole Terran Empire resembles more like a Hollywood interpretation of the Roman Empire than anything. They even have the same de facto method of succession to the imperial throne - have a big enough part of the military follow you and its yours. And of course, Georgiou's adoption of Burnham is also similar to the Roman emperors adopting their own heirs apparent. Not to mention the part about the need for continuous expansion to obtain more slave labor.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top