The most creative and diverse aspect of Star Trek is the visual design.
Even that is pretty thin. Basic outline for starships, everyone from a particular race all dress alike.
The most creative and diverse aspect of Star Trek is the visual design.
What I'm trying to figure is what makes something not Star Trek, especially in current iteration.When I go to watch "Star Trek", I go in expecting certain things. It goes with the territory of using the Star Trek moniker. If it isn't "Star Trek" then I'm likely to be disappointed, regardless of the quality. Much like if I order a cheeseburger and get a filet o' fish in my McDonald's bag. The filet o' fish may be great, but it isn't the cheeseburger I ordered.
What I'm trying to figure is what makes something not Star Trek, especially in current iteration.
I dont really understand comparing the Empress with Hitler.I tend to think a spy show with an "end justify the means" outlook with a former space Hitler as the lead would put it outside the scope of Star Trek for me. Of course, YMMV.
I don't know if that's how the show going to go. I'll judge it then.I tend to think a spy show with an "end justify the means" outlook with a former space Hitler as the lead would put it outside the scope of Star Trek for me. Of course, YMMV.
I dont really understand comparing the Empress with Hitler.
She kind of strikes me like a Roman emperor, one of the more competent ones. Not necessarily a philosopher like Marcus Aurelius. She is willing to do a lot to maintain the Pax Terra, and an empire that does not expand, ultimately contracts. She'a haughty but not blindly so. Shes an Empress seemingly descended from a line of rulers that followed a code, though not one we'd recognize or agree with.She killed a lot of people to maintain power. Maybe Stalin would be a better comparison?
She kind of strikes me like a Roman emperor, one of the more competent ones. Not necessarily a philosopher like Marcus Aurelius. She is willing to do a lot to maintain the Pax Terra, and an empire that does not expand, ultimately contracts. She'a haughty but not blindly so. Shes an Empress seemingly descended from a line of rulers that followed a code, though not one we'd recognize or agree with.
Hitler was an ignorant brat, amoral, with a limited world view who used easy answers, defenseless scapegoats, the divisions within his opposition, and a rebounding economy (that he wasn't responsible for) to forge a very brief powerful regime. That type seems to pop up more regularly than I'd like.
This. The appeal of a Section 31 show with Michelle Yeoh has much wider international appeal. A Pike show while might have a lot of talk among Trek fans is actually a limiting offering by comparison.Why would CBS want to stop developing a show starring international star Michelle Yeoh?
We have to permanently agree to disagree about Georgiou's redeem-ability. Arguing about a subject like this for years on end is not going to be an enjoyable experience. At best. At worst, it's going to start slowly driving people away.
In an era of "there are good people on both sides", I'm not sure it sends a good message of having Space Stalin leading the intelligence arm of a supposed evolved Federation. YMMV.
See you later.
I've also noticed however, that optimism itself is understood in very different ways among fans. I've seen the possible "fallen Federation" setting for Discovery's season 3 being dismissed as just like any other dystopian science fiction, and I'm just asking myself why Discovery couldn't be optimistic in that setting as well. If the story were about the ship rebuilding hope, the crew working together to make the world a better place and their efforts actually succeeding, it would be an optimistic message for me, dystopian setting aside.
Terran salutes do kind of resemble Nazi salutes.I dont really understand comparing the Empress with Hitler.
Oh wow.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.