I'm glad Garak (or Cardassians in general) got mentioned, because it got me thinking. I was too young when Deep Space Nine aired, but were people getting into such heated debates about Gul Dukat and the Cardassians as well? If I wanted to describe anyone as Space Hitler, it would be Dukat. And the Cardassians themselves were shown on screen to do many of the same things the Nazis did, and for much of the same reasons, even, and they were shown in a gritty, realistic fashion instead of the Terrans' overblown, cartoonish sociopathy. I just find it so weird that Dukat still had so many fans that the writers eventually had to reduce him to a cartoonish, insane, omnicidal cult leader because he just had too much charisma for a lot of fans to really be able to hate him.
Yes, this was actually a real, dramatic issue for the writers of DS9:
They
specifically used the Cardassian occupation and Gul Dukat for Nazi-analogues and talk about war crimes and history. And they were
shocked at how beloved Gul Dukat became through the sheer power of Marc Alaimo's charisma. They damn well knew what kind of monster they were writing, but wanted him to be more three-dimensional, so they gave him a lot of "good" qualities as well (like Hitler loving his pet dog so much,
aawwww), and even teamed him up with the heroes from time to time. But instead of the fans feeling "conflicted" about that, Gul Dukat had straight up "fans" and admirerers. They talked in a bunch of interviews how fucked up that was (of course waaay nicer, because they knew better than to insult fans). That's one of the reason they did such a 180° on Dukat later on - to show people
Jesus Christ of course he was a monster the entire time!
But you see the most important distinction in the character's reactions: Gul Dukat was as snarky and charming as Georgiou is now. But ALL the characters - from Kira to Sisko - acted in his proximity with the disgust and contempt such a monster deserves. Nobody gave him a joke-y wink from a beaming plattform.
I think that's the strength of Trek of the past, that they always were treating the characters like real-world analogues. Whereas the new writers just seem to see fictional characters in them, to shape for their will. Garak did a lot of evil stuff - he tortured people, and commited straight up murder for the greater good. But he was always portrayed with the same "admiration" real life terrorists/freedom fighters would get. There were lines he never crossed - he didn't blow up an entire planet one episode, just to be back to "snarky grey guy" for the next episode.
And yes, I can completely understand Lord Garth getting upset about talking this so much. And I can really emphasize, and even feel sorry for bringing it up myself again. But this is not the fans fault - the creators decided to do that. They decided to introduce a fascist overlord, model her as close as possible after real history's worst mass murderers, and then turn her into a shiny hero-figure for people to laugh with.
That's fucked up. But it's the
producers' fault. They can, like the DS9 writers back in the day, end that entire scharade with
one press release "sorry, we didn't think that through, we're not doing that anymore". Otherwise, OF COURSE people will write them about,
hey, maybe you shouldn't make a fucking cannibal Nazi leader the hero of your "fun" action-adventure show???