• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Does moving the Eugenics Wars into the 21st century fundamentally change things?

Do you prefer...

  • Moving the Eugenics Wars to fit within a possible version of our timeline?

    Votes: 27 36.5%
  • Or keeping it in the 1990s and just accepting that as Trek's version of the 1990s?

    Votes: 47 63.5%

  • Total voters
    74
Voyager arrived in 1996. The Eugenics were wrapping up by then, and it was said that it was a war that took place overseas. Previous Trek mentioned the continents where the supermen were in play.

Would day-to-day life in L.A. really be any different?
Did it? We know the "supermen" took over 40 countries. We don't know which countries. We know Khan managed to expand his control to an area covering Asia thru Middle East. We know Archer's Grandfather fought in North Africa during the wars. Presumably there were at least 40 factions among the Augments at the start. I think that's about it.
 
Last edited:
(You know, I've still never seen that episode of Voyager.)

Even if Voyager might have depicted "the home front" while there was a global conflict going on elsewhere, WE certainly have no memories of such things. Or... Well, I don't. I can't speak for everyone.

There are people (not me) who have the whole TOS timeline and it's variations committed to memory. But Space Seed flat out states that WWIII and The Eugenics Wars are synonymous, But there are other episodes that make them distinct. And Encounter at Farpoint (Roddenberry) makes WWIII later without mentioning the EW and First Contact (film) also moves it mid 21st century.

Now SNW is making them the same thing / closely related. Again.

OTOH rather than kicking the can down the road another 30 years, they're setting up the chronology to be right on our temporal doorstep!

Did (the episode named after a quote from The Scottish Play) give a time when it was set?
 
Did (the episode named after a quote from The Scottish Play) give a time when it was set?
No, but if Khan ages normally, it would be in about 25-30 years or so, which fits in with everything from TNG on, i.e. taking place in the middle of the 21st century.
 
Voyager arrived in 1996. The Eugenics were wrapping up by then, and it was said that it was a war that took place overseas. Previous Trek mentioned the continents where the supermen were in play.

Would day-to-day life in L.A. really be any different?
Perhaps not, but there is the big problem that when Voyager was sighted by the backyard barbecue guy, Neelix observed that civilian media dismissed the footage as a hoax while the U.S. military was only 'taking things a bit more seriously'. If an active war was raging for the USA, I would think the sighting of a strange craft would cause a lot of panic.
 
No, but if Khan ages normally, it would be in about 25-30 years or so, which fits in with everything from TNG on, i.e. taking place in the middle of the 21st century.
No I meant the episode itself. The time when La'an and Jim were running about in.
 
The idea that a modern audience can't connect with Star Trek because it's too much to ask that Khan escaped to space in 1996 is like saying Doctor Who fans can't make a connection because the Daleks didn't invade London in the 1960s.

Regards to the story in question, you might be conflating the fact it was made in the 1960s with the impression it is set in the 1960s. It isn't. The Daleks invade Earth in the 22nd Century.
 
Last edited:
Have a super smart God like alen like Q state to a character on a show that there are literally trillions of alternate realities in existence.

Didn't TNG: "Parallels" do that decades ago?


Star Trek first speculated there would be Eugenics Wars at the end of the 20th century and WWIII at the beginning (to middle) of the 21st.

As someone mentioned, Spock said the Eugenics Wars were the last of Earth's world wars, and "Farpoint"/FC ignored the EW altogether. It wasn't until DS9 and ENT that the EW were mentioned again, but DS9 mistakenly put them "200 years ago" (i.e. the 2170s) and ENT implied a mid-21st century time frame for them.


So Star Trek future is not the goal any more? But to avoid calamity through ideas shared in the inspiration?

Of course. Science fiction has never, ever been about predicting the correct facts of history. SF writers are not delusional enough to imagine we have prophetic gifts. Our goal is to offer conjectures of conceivable futures in hopes of getting people to imagine the future they want to see and maybe work toward it, or at least to work away from the bad possibilities that cautionary tales warn about.

As I've been saying all along, it's taking "Trek is our future" way too literally to think it's about the actual events happening. Of course they aren't going to happen. Of course there aren't humanoid aliens with psychic powers out there, or godlike Great Gazoos who can alter reality by snapping their fingers. It's all metaphorical. The goal is to be a metaphor for the kind of future we could have.
 
Plus Valtane died in "Flashback" when he's alive at the end of STVI. Alternate timeline!
Tuvok having a piss-poor memory is far more plausible and has worked for the past twenty-seven years.
Yeah, that episode gives you a ready made explanation for all of its inconsistencies (And there are several: Rand being a commander, getting the elapsed time of TUC wrong, Valtine dying at the end when he's clearly seen at the end of TUC): Tuvok has a mind virus that is screwing up his memory. Therefore, practically nothing we see in the mind meld flashback of "Flashback" is "real."
(You know, I've still never seen that episode of Voyager.)
You're honestly not missing much. It dropped the ball in several ways.
 
The real question for me is how does this change the impact the stories. Is there really any difference between the Eugenics Wars happening in 1992 or 2042 in the terms of story? Are the plots of Space Seed or TWOK altered by that change? Is Khan different. Is his fate somehow altered? Are the events as we know them changed? How about the actions of Kirk and crew? Is there any impact on future stories? I say no. The dates are irrelevant to the story. Chosen because they are/were in our future. Now those dates are are past. So yes, lets move these fictional events up the time. When other dates cross from future into past do the same. Story over "data points".

If the Eugenics Wars got pushed forward 30 years, then maybe the events of of DIS were also pushed 30 years into the future?

In the universe of the 1990s Eugenics Wars...
  • Maybe Burnham's dad was killed in 2216, a few years before hostilities between the Federation and Klingon Empire broke out.
  • Maybe Burnham is Sarek’s adoptive sibling instead of Spock
  • Maybe the discovery of the Sarcophagus ship and the Battle at the Binary Stars were supposed to happen in 2226-27, instead of 2256-57.
  • Maybe when DIS jumped to the future, the were supposed to be in 3158-59, instead of 3188-89. Maybe that would explain “Calypso”.
And that line from Georgiou of "No one had seen a Klingon in a hundred years" would also mean that all encounters with Klingons, barring in Broken Bow, would not be in the record books.
 
If the Eugenics Wars got pushed forward 30 years, then maybe the events of of DIS were also pushed 30 years into the future?

In the universe of the 1990s Eugenics Wars...
  • Maybe Burnham's dad was killed in 2216, a few years before hostilities between the Federation and Klingon Empire broke out.
  • Maybe Burnham is Sarek’s adoptive sibling instead of Spock
  • Maybe the discovery of the Sarcophagus ship and the Battle at the Binary Stars were supposed to happen in 2226-27, instead of 2256-57.
  • Maybe when DIS jumped to the future, the were supposed to be in 3158-59, instead of 3188-89. Maybe that would explain “Calypso”.
And that line from Georgiou of "No one had seen a Klingon in a hundred years" would also mean that all encounters with Klingons, barring in Broken Bow, would not be in the record books.
No
 
Perhaps not, but there is the big problem that when Voyager was sighted by the backyard barbecue guy, Neelix observed that civilian media dismissed the footage as a hoax while the U.S. military was only 'taking things a bit more seriously'. If an active war was raging for the USA, I would think the sighting of a strange craft would cause a lot of panic.

The USA were involved in the Eugenics Wars?

TOS made it seem like Khan's territory was overseas in other continents.

Also it was 1996. Things had wrapped up that year with the conflict.
Did it? We know the "supermen" took over 40 countries. We don't know which countries. We know Khan managed to expand his control to an area covering Asia thru Middle East. We know Archer's Grandfather fought in North Africa during the wars. Presumably there were at least 40 factions among the Augments at the start. I think that's about it.

Yup. And we've had overseas conflicts happening in the world during our lifetime. Did they really impact the day to day lives of Americans over here? Not drastically.

Though we definitely saw some American anti-Government types within the episode, planning for the near apocalypse and having a fallout shelter with tons of guns.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top