Jammer wrote a 1,500 word
review of the episode. Come on. It's not hard to find.
Words do not make a review. This wordage did not correctly say anything about the themes the episode was clearly concerned about. We might attribute this to incompetence on the reviewer's part but
the episode is not even correctly described. No one who reads this review would have any idea about what actually happened in this episode, even though these are not supposed to be spoiler free reviews. The only thing he wrote about was the first two acts. In the second two acts, if nothing else, there was a society using recreational drugs and offering group sex. This is rather notable, but it's not noted because the review is not even finished, i.e., he refused to write one.
The supposed 1500 words are aimed at filling up an empty space in the complete set of reviews. There are complaints about poor execution but there are no details. This is true even though such grossly obvious details as the vulval doorways are practically begging for commentary. There are complaints about cliches which are typical of most Trek episodes, from Star Trek on, and many, many other SF adventure shows, and therefore not about the episode at all. Suddenly discovering a problem with something that is common to other shows or episodes is sure symptom of refusal to say what's reallly on the mind. And this also refusing to write a review.
The genetic programming of a hatred for the Nizari is equivalent to genetic programming of a love for the Founders. Objecting to the one while enjoying the other (especially since the Founders don't even have a form to love

) is nuts. This is one reason why something about this episode was clearly offputting to a DS9 fan. And refusing to talk about why the one is great and the other is objectionable, is refusing to write the review.
You may draw a distinction between criticism and reviews but even a review should give a hint as to why someone didn't like what's being reviewed. This so called review does not even attempt to do that. In fact, it does even worse because of the pretended reasons, an objection to Fun with DNA, falsifies the story. A key plot point is that the DNA can't do everything, the exact opposite of the alleged complaint. And to repeat, this guy loves DS9 which has much worse offenses, for episode after episode, with DNA. When someone claims to dislike something because of a trait which is not true, you're not getting the real story. Once again, this is refusing to write the review.
The smell of BS may give you the warm fuzzies but it offends me.