• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC to REBOOT???

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Out of My Vulcan Mind...thanks for clarifying that. I hadn't seen a statement from him yet.

@C Miller...Oracle's "Batman, Inc" storyline was dealt with in the Birds of Prey arc called "Death of Oracle".
 
Back to the Super-marriage thing, a little compare and contrast: being married kills stories, but being a (rotten) parent is still okay, since Damien Wayne is still scuttling around.

Batman: capable of honing his body to the peak of physical perfection, but not capable of pulling out. No one wonder he's never had a serious girlfriend.
 
Yeah, it can't be a complete reboot because Batman Incorporated is going to be in continuity and continued in Early 2012 for the conclusion to Morrison's epic that begun in 2006ish. I wonder if that's why intentionally Oracle has not appeared in Batman Inc, so they don't have to explain that away. But, Stephanie Brown is showing up in it in issue 9, so I'm not sure.
If you're thinking Stephenie Brown being in it will make it out of continuity, that shouldn't be the case since Gail Simone has already said she does plan on using her and Cassandra Cain in her Batgirl if no one else does.
 
Yeah, it can't be a complete reboot because Batman Incorporated is going to be in continuity and continued in Early 2012 for the conclusion to Morrison's epic that begun in 2006ish. I wonder if that's why intentionally Oracle has not appeared in Batman Inc, so they don't have to explain that away. But, Stephanie Brown is showing up in it in issue 9, so I'm not sure.
If you're thinking Stephenie Brown being in it will make it out of continuity, that shouldn't be the case since Gail Simone has already said she does plan on using her and Cassandra Cain in her Batgirl if no one else does.

I'm not thinking that Stephanie Brown in it will make it out of continuity, but it will mean it's continuity will have to be explained. If she were just showing up as a character, it wouldn't be much trouble, but she's showing up as Batgirl, which means that she will have been Batgirl (probably with Barbara still as her mentor) which makes me wonder whether Barbara as Batgirl is going to be healed or have her just be a clean slate. I was hoping clean slate, but now I'm not so sure.


As for Oracle's Inc. story, that can easily be explained away since it wasn't in the actual Batman Inc. title and if I remember correct, it was never reffered to.
 
I'm not thinking that Stephanie Brown in it will make it out of continuity, but it will mean it's continuity will have to be explained. If she were just showing up as a character, it wouldn't be much trouble, but she's showing up as Batgirl, which means that she will have been Batgirl (probably with Barbara still as her mentor) which makes me wonder whether Barbara as Batgirl is going to be healed or have her just be a clean slate. I was hoping clean slate, but now I'm not so sure.
It's confusing. Gail Simone's interview at Newsarama suggested that Barbara was Oracle -- but she also said that Barbara would be younger than she is now. And then we found out this week that Killing Joke is still in nuDCU continuity. (Link.) So now I'm back to the thought that Batgirl is a crimefighting cyberspace avatar, or possibly Barbara is wearing an exoskeleton that gives her mobility.
 
Yeah, it can't be a complete reboot because Batman Incorporated is going to be in continuity and continued in Early 2012 for the conclusion to Morrison's epic that begun in 2006ish. I wonder if that's why intentionally Oracle has not appeared in Batman Inc, so they don't have to explain that away. But, Stephanie Brown is showing up in it in issue 9, so I'm not sure.
If you're thinking Stephenie Brown being in it will make it out of continuity, that shouldn't be the case since Gail Simone has already said she does plan on using her and Cassandra Cain in her Batgirl if no one else does.
I don't really get Cassandra Cain.

I actually like the character and the aesthetics and large parts of the backstory, but there's this preposterousness at the heart of her that is almost impossible to overcome. Basically, how would creating a borderline-feral human being translate into a creating a world-class assassin?

I'm willing to play the "it's comics, just roll with it" game as much as anybody, so I'll accept the unlikely proposition that people who aren't taught to speak can instead become versed in "the language of violence," or that this would be a particularly useful skill in an age where an assassin's first tools are firearms and explosives.

Yet, I'm pretty positive that reading, writing, and speaking would be essential skills for someone in the business of infiltrating foreign countries, killing people therein, and then exfiltrating themselves out again. I mean, according to Batgirl, Genie is a successful assassin in waiting, not someone who requires a full-time staff of nurses and social workers to take care of her even though she's 54.*

Bear in mind I haven't read many Batgirl comics. I'd be happy to have it explained to me why David Cain thought this was a good idea.

*And yeah, Genie's story is absolutely heartbreaking, so don't actually read it unless you feel like being depressed. The Wiki entry doesn't include her current status, which I wound up investigating. Iirc, she lives in an assisted living facility for developmentally disabled adults in Los Angeles. Poor, poor thing.
 
I wonder if Batgirl is going to be a "Legends of Dark Knight" style series. In other words, it is going to take place "in the past" when Babs could still walk. In Post-Crisis, we really haven't had any long-term Babs-as-Batgirl tales (as far as I can remember, anyway).
 
Looks like he's leaning alittle towards The Dark Knight version of Two Face there.
 
I took House of Ulster's comment to mean the DC honchos...or especially Dan DiDio and Geoff Johns lol. All of this Silver Age rehash stuff I believe is coming from them. Not that it is a bad thing but why bother having a "modern era" if you just harken back to the past?
 
Ok I kind of understand breaking up Lois Lane and Superman BUT what is with this bizarre obsession of getting Wonder Woman and Superman together. Honestly I don't see it since they aren't very compatible.

Some people are stuck in the Silver Age.

Yes...the majority of people who've ever read a Superman or Wonder Woman comic, in fact. :lol:

By now, you might be right. Who else is gonna put up with this nostalgia rehash stuff, anyway?
 
By now, you might be right. Who else is gonna put up with this nostalgia rehash stuff, anyway?

I would have been right five years ago, or ten. Doing the arithmetic on the total monthly sales of either DC or Marvel comics in modern times shows that the majority of people who have ever read any of these are mid-to-late wave Baby Boomers. As far as the comics themselves are concerned Marvel and DC are boutique publishers catering to a small hardcore audience.
 
Random thought that may or may not even reflect reality once the books are published, but there are some moments recently in DC comics that I'm going to miss if the new line-up goes as it is.

One example is the relationship between Bruce Wayne and Karen Starr right now. I like her attempt at helping the world outside of being Power Girl, with Bruce helping her play the "rich benefactor to the world" type role.

Another thing I've been enjoying is the way people are noticing that Dick is not the original Batman. References are scattered throughout the Bat titles but they go from amusing (Dick's Batman voice not being "growly" enough) to some truly touching moments like Gordon giving him advice in "Gates of Gotham #1".

I've also really enjoyed the web of character interactions currently being developed in "Batgirl" from Wendy's story arc to Batgirl coming into her own.

I fear such things will be sacrificed after this relaunch, which saddens me because they're some of the nicest moments I've read in DC books in years.
 
Everything new is old again, yeah.

As nearly as I can tell, Power Girl is straight-up erased from history. Or at least the "property is being rested."
 
As nearly as I can tell, Power Girl is straight-up erased from history. Or at least the "property is being rested."
Power Girl will be showing up in one of the relaunched books, but DC hasn't told us which one.

From an interview with DC VP Bob Harris at Comicvine:
CV: Will we be seeing Power Girl in the future?
Bob: Yeah, she'll be around.
CV: But not in her own title?
Bob: No, she won't have her own #1 title, but Karen Starr will appear in one of the 52 titles.
http://www.comicvine.com/news/bob-h...al-the-reason-for-dcs-revamped-titles/143212/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top