Further proof that Discovery isn't Prime!Pike wasn't sexist in the Abramsverse films; there's no need for him to be sexist in DSC.
"The Cage" 's Pike is sexist, so make him a sexist as****e in DIS.
My response was aimed at Brainsucker.
But I will guarantee that they will make Pike a very flawed character on STD. They can't have him be an awesome badass and make Burnham look inferior in comparison.
He was flawed in "The Cage" as well.But I will guarantee that they will make Pike a very flawed character on STD. They can't have him be an awesome badass and make Burnham look inferior in comparison. They will do something to him that makes him look shady or weak. That's my biggest reservation about bringing Pike and friends onto this series.
Not quite the same thing.He really isn't. Kirk had the exact same issue with having a female Yeoman.
See "The Corbimite Maneuver" and Kirk's conversation with McCoy about Rand.
But I will guarantee that they will make Pike a very flawed character on STD. They can't have him be an awesome badass and make Burnham look inferior in comparison. They will do something to him that makes him look shady or weak. That's my biggest reservation about bringing Pike and friends onto this series.
Very much so. It's almost a point of the episode.He was flawed in "The Cage" as well.
Not quite the same thing.
He was flawed in "The Cage" as well.
Minus the line about women on the bridge.About Kirk? He said he disliked the idea of having a female Yeoman, and then he said he already has a female to worry about... and her name is the Enterprise.
It was a reworked version of Pike being annoyed at the Colt girl.
Maybe.Well this time in a less endearing way on STD. I still say Pike in one episode (The Cage) was far more compelling a lead and respectable as hero than divisive Burnham during STD's entire S1 run. They will have to do something with him (and likely Spock) that will put them in a position for Burnham and friends to save them and show them de way.
Flawed is one thing. He was actually kind of whiney in The Cage. Complaining about the drag of being in charge of hundreds of people, deciding who lives and who dies, etc, etc., like this was some kind of new revelation about the burdens of command that he never knew existed until recently. Just how long had he been Captain by that point? He seemed a joyless character without any of the wonder and amazement we saw from Kirk. He never demonstrated what a privilege it was to do what he was doing, just grousing about having to do it and grumbling through the entire episode.He was flawed in "The Cage" as well.
It wouldn’t be anyway. It would look more like the Cage era bridge.Don't bet on it. And if they show the bridge of the Enterprise, don't bet that it will look like TOS either.
It's not as if people were cool with slavery in 1964, either. The context of that conversation is important; Pike was merely ruminating about going into business in the colonies, and Boyce rebuked him with a sarcastic remark about dealing in green slave women, to drive home the point that Pike shouldn't be considering other options, he should be facing his challenges as captain. It's not as if either one of them took that specific option seriously.Maybe they could recreate that conversation Pike had with Boyce where he says he might go into the slave trade when he retires. Bet that would go over well with today's viewers.
Flawed is one thing. He was actually kind of whiney in The Cage. Complaining about the drag of being in charge of hundreds of people, deciding who lives and who dies, etc, etc., like this was some kind of new revelation about the burdens of command that he never knew existed until recently. Just how long had he been Captain by that point? He seemed a joyless character without any of the wonder and amazement we saw from Kirk. He never demonstrated what a privilege it was to do what he was doing, just grousing about having to do it and grumbling through the entire episode.
Now, that being said, I think this is an insanely awesome casting choice. I hope Mount brings a greater depth to the character that he deserves.
Minus the line about women on the bridge.
It's not as if people were cool with slavery in 1964, either. The context of that conversation is important; Pike was merely ruminating about going into business in the colonies, and Boyce rebuked him with a sarcastic remark about dealing in green slave women, to drive home the point that Pike shouldn't be considering other options, he should be facing his challenges as captain. It's not as if either one of them took that specific option seriously.
It wouldn’t be anyway. It would look more like the Cage era bridge.
It's not as if people were cool with slavery in 1964, either. The context of that conversation is important; Pike was merely ruminating about going into business in the colonies, and Boyce rebuked him with a sarcastic remark about dealing in green slave women, to drive home the point that Pike shouldn't be considering other options, he should be facing his challenges as captain. It's not as if either one of them took that specific option seriously.
It implies that Number One gets a pass for some reason. Probably the one mentioned later in the episode.It works in context. Especially when followed with the 'No offense Number One, you're different of course.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.