• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Canon, Continuity, and Pike's Accident

How in the fuck did this happen? I don't recall Spock ever being interested in Chapel.
But you do recall Chapel being interesting in Spock? I think it's a liberty to be sure. But it isn't completely out of nowhere. Unless they do some massive (and preferably effective) gymnastics I don't think they're going to line up SNW and, say, The Naked Time.

OTOH, Spock doesn't admit a lot of things.

It does cast the characters in a very different light. You can't watch it anymore and think "She has NO shot with this guy." For that matter, even McCoy's teasing her lands very differently now.

James never mentioned George served on the 1701,
Jim never mentioned for a whole season that he served on the Farragut. He didn't mention that he was from Iowa until the fourth movie.

I have more of a problem with Uhura (for example) never indicating that she was friends with Sam when Sam dies than I do with "Oh! So suddenly McCoy had a fourth grade math teacher? In three seasons and six movies he never ONCE mentioned a math teacher!"

There are areas of continuity that are at least vaguely explored but there is a whole lot that is wide open. (Like, lots of room for Spock to have a foster sister.)

I want to know - are we ever going to meet Sam's wife and kids?
 
Last edited:
James never mentioned George served on the 1701, Chapel was basically in shock at Spock's emotions in Amok Time, doubly shocked when Spock said he was married.
I don't recall her shock and I don't recall an opportunity for Kirk to go "As everyone knows my brother, George Samuel Kirk, served on the Enterprise at least until I kicked his butt in chess and he had to a new colony to hide his shame."

People don't talk like that, don't exposite information that way. Not sure why that would happen...?
 
S02E03 basically let it outta the bag that it's a different timeline anyways, some things might come to fruition (Pike's accident) but other things are gonna get heavily retconned or erased.
Continuinity wise:
James never mentioned George served on the 1701, Chapel was basically in shock at Spock's emotions in Amok Time, doubly shocked when Spock said he was married.
Certain crew members had no clue who Khan Noonien Singh was in TOS, but everyone here knows La'An's connection to him.
The biggest canon break is the Gorn thing but that's a whole thread subject.
I am honestly enjoying SNW for what it is but part of me wishes this and Discovery were set in the LD timeline or somewhere nearby (2390s) and flesh out the Romulus destruction better than what we got in PIC S1.
Given an existential threat to the Federation when the Feds realize Romulans even if evil were holding back even worse creatures or aliens from the far end of the Beta Quadrant, and now they are in over their heads.
Flinging Discovery to the 31st century was a big mistake, now whatever timeline we see will never matter because we already know the outcome.
Nope, same timeline.
 
Its like when we as fans presume that Pike and Kirk met when Pike was promoted to Fleet Captain off the Enterprise and Kirk took command of the ship.

Well, the exchange from "The Menagerie" is:

MENDEZ: You ever met Chris Pike?
KIRK: We met when he was promoted to Fleet Captain.
MENDEZ: About your age. Big, handsome man, vital, active.
KIRK: I took over the Enterprise from him. Spock served with him for several years.
SPOCK: Eleven years, four months, five days.

Lots of room for interpretation there.
 
It does cast the characters in a very different light. You can't watch it anymore and think "She has NO shot with this guy."
TOS Chapel, I still totally think that. Because outside of WALGMO, she's just a doormat. I can't see TOS Spock being interested in her at all.

But I view SNW as an alternate continuity to TOS (There are just too many differences for it to be anything but IMO), so all bets are off. Jess Bush's Chapel I can see Spock falling for.
Jim never mentioned for a whole season that he served on the Farragut. He didn't mention that he was from Iowa until the fourth movie.
Kirk does say that he was born on Earth in "The Gamesters of Triskelion," though. :)
 
TOS Chapel, I still totally think that. Because outside of WALGMO, she's just a doormat. I can't see TOS Spock being interested in her at all.

But I view SNW as an alternate continuity to TOS (There are just too many differences for it to be anything but IMO), so all bets are off. Jess Bush's Chapel I can see Spock falling for.
I struggle with the fact that I'm not mad that SNW wants me to ship Chapel / Spock after 50 years, but that it's WORKING.

Kirk does say that he was born on Earth in "The Gamesters of Triskelion," though. :)
SEE how tight lipped these people are? George Kirk was Kirk's mom's FOURTH HUSBAND and Jim has DOZENS of step siblings! We don't know! :D
 
Its like when we as fans presume that Pike and Kirk met when Pike was promoted to Fleet Captain off the Enterprise and Kirk took command of the ship.

Well, the exchange from "The Menagerie" is:



Lots of room for interpretation there.
Pike and Kirk will be like Sarek and Spock, or Grievous and Anakin. Always just missing each other.
 
Lots of room for interpretation there.
That's kind of the whole point of a prequel though, in my opinion. Treating SNW as a alternate or altered timeline is fine if continuity is that important in terms of enjoyment of the story. For my part, SNW is doing the strongest thing a prequel can do; make me go "Oh, I never realized" and seeing interactions from a whole new light.

Many post about how they cannot see this Chapel becoming like TOS Chapel. For that I can only say please don't work with traumatized or depressed people. The change that grief and loss can have on a person is profound, and I would say the loss of a fiancée counts.

I welcome the multiple interpretations of characters. It's when I go, "Meh, I already know that," that a show becomes stale.

As always, mileage will vary.
 
Maybe Chris Hemsworth is now beyond their paygrade, but they should bring back Jennifer Morrison to be the Kirks' mom.

Winona: George, you need to clean up your own dishes after you have those briefings!

Sam: Mom, don't tell me this in front of Jim and Spock!

Spock: :rommie:

James: Is that a smile Spock? Yeah, I thought I saw you smile.
 
Its like when we as fans presume that Pike and Kirk met when Pike was promoted to Fleet Captain off the Enterprise and Kirk took command of the ship.

Well, the exchange from "The Menagerie" is:
MENDEZ: You ever met Chris Pike?
KIRK: We met when he was promoted to Fleet Captain.
MENDEZ: About your age. Big, handsome man, vital, active.
KIRK: I took over the Enterprise from him. Spock served with him for several years.
SPOCK: Eleven years, four months, five days.


Lots of room for interpretation there.

Particularly because part of it is foolish gibberish to begin with.

Pike is at least a decade older than Kirk, maybe closer to twenty years older. That's required by what's shown onscreen.
 
I struggle with the fact that I'm not mad that SNW wants me to ship Chapel / Spock after 50 years, but that it's WORKING.
:lol:
That's kind of the whole point of a prequel though, in my opinion. Treating SNW as a alternate or altered timeline is fine if continuity is that important in terms of enjoyment of the story. For my part, SNW is doing the strongest thing a prequel can do; make me go "Oh, I never realized" and seeing interactions from a whole new light.
For me, that's what Better Call Saul did, and it's a far better prequel than SNW is. With SNW, I most often say, "Well, that's a neat idea. It doesn't really jibe with what TOS showed us, but it's a neat idea." Chapel's new characterization, one of Khan's descendants serving aboard the ship, Spock embracing his human half more than we ever saw on TOS, Chapel & Uhura knowing T'Pring before "Amok Time," Spock & Chapel having a flirtation/relationship, Uhura serving on the Enterprise as both a cadet and an ensign, Sam Kirk being in Starfleet and serving aboard the Enterprise, M'Benga serving as the Enterprise's CMO years before "A Private Little War," the Gorn being completely different, the more advanced tech... There are just too many differences, both big and small, for me to regard SNW as anything more than a "broad strokes" prequel to TOS. So yeah, I regard it as an alternate universe to maintain my sanity.
Many post about how they cannot see this Chapel becoming like TOS Chapel. For that I can only say please don't work with traumatized or depressed people. The change that grief and loss can have on a person is profound, and I would say the loss of a fiancée counts.
But TOS Chapel was like that before she lost her fiancé. "The Naked Time" takes place before WALGMO in production order, stardate order, and airdate order. So TOS Chapel was either always wimpy or whatever changed her happened before WALGMO.
 
For me, that's what Better Call Saul did, and it's a far better prequel than SNW is
So what? I stated what I think a prequel should do, not who did it better?:shrug::shrug::shrug:
But TOS Chapel was like that before she lost her fiancé. "The Naked Time" takes place before WALGMO in production order, stardate order, and airdate order. So TOS Chapel was either always wimpy or whatever changed her happened before WALGMO.
Losing her fiancé? Yeah, can't imagine her fears and the impact upon her mood. People sure are sensitive about their lost loved ones...:shrug:

Chapel & Uhura knowing T'Pring before "Amok Time,
Why doesn't Chapel know? Seriously, people are pouring over that episode like it's the map to the Ark of the Covenant but I cannot find any indication of such that Chapel didn't know. Uhura asks who she is and that's it.

Spock & Chapel having a flirtation/relationship, Uhura serving on the Enterprise as both a cadet and an ensign, Sam Kirk being in Starfleet and serving aboard the Enterprise, M'Benga serving as the Enterprise's CMO years before "A Private Little War,"
I struggle to see how these are contradicted from what we saw in TOS.

he Gorn being completely different
To me this is like watching only John Wayne films and meeting a cowboy who is nothing like John Wayne.

So yeah, I regard it as an alternate universe to maintain my sanity.
Well if you're worried about sanity use mine. I know I'm not using it.*


*all due credit to MASH and their writers.
 
Everyone had heard of Khan, they just didn't realize the guy they brought out of stasis was him.
Exactly. They knew of him, and possible history, but didn't know him by just looking at him. Just like Kodos the Executioner. Kirk suspected but needed proof.
 
Everyone had heard of Khan, they just didn't realize the guy they brought out of stasis was him.
Yep.
KIRK: Name, Khan, as we know him today. (Spock changes the picture) Name, Khan Noonien Singh.
SPOCK: From 1992 through 1996, absolute ruler of more than a quarter of your world. From Asia through the Middle East.
MCCOY: The last of the tyrants to be overthrown.
SCOTT: I must confess, gentlemen. I've always held a sneaking admiration for this one.
KIRK: He was the best of the tyrants and the most dangerous. They were supermen, in a sense. Stronger, braver, certainly more ambitious, more daring.
SPOCK: Gentlemen, this romanticism about a ruthless dictator is
KIRK: Mister Spock, we humans have a streak of barbarism in us. Appalling, but there, nevertheless.
SCOTT: There were no massacres under his rule.
SPOCK: And as little freedom.
MCCOY: No wars until he was attacked.
SPOCK: Gentlemen.
KIRK: Mister Spock, you misunderstand us. We can be against him and admire him all at the same time.
SPOCK: Illogical.
KIRK: Totally. This is the Captain. Put a twenty four hour security on Mister Khan's quarters, effective immediately.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top