Cool!!A lot of visual design and preproduction stuff for Desanto's HSG in this video:
I can.People who hate the Star Wars SE's wouldn't care nearly as much if they could legally watch the originals.
Ssshhh! You’re not supposed to say the quiet part out loud.I can.
*quietly plugs his VHS player in*Ssshhh! You’re not supposed to say the quiet part out loud.
What a totally ingenuous argument. I don't even know why they bother to put the films on Disney+ when people still have VHS.*quietly plugs his VHS player in*
I had no idea. That's mind blowing.I had forgotten how far along the Singer version was.
I have often wondered that myself.What a totally ingenuous argument. I don't even know why they bother to put the films on Disney+ when people still have VHS
And Kennedy seems to be willing to keep them were Lucas had them at.The versions on Disney+ are based off the last edits George had done for the 3D release that never happened. Any of the changes were done Pre-Disney buying the company.
I'll take that bet. Optimistically I'd give it 50/50.I bet when the 50th anniversary rolls around in a few years Disney releases fancy box sets with the originals. They’re less about Lucas’ vision and more about making money.
I think it's because of how personal Star Trek feels to all of us. So, arguing about different points of continuity isn't just a debate, but a personal attack.One thing I have found odd in the canon/continuity/whatever arguments is the hostility, smugness and snark between the “sides”.
seems typical for this kinda stuff. Yet still odd IMO.
This is nothing compared to Star Wars. I myself am still enduring the ongoing Star Wars social media brainwashing that tells me that 2003 Clone Wars, Droids and Ewok cartoons, and Ewok movies were never canon and trying to reconcile that with what I actually remember from 2003 and the 1980s/1990s.One thing I have found odd in the canon/continuity/whatever arguments is the hostility, smugness and snark between the “sides”.
seems typical for this kinda stuff. Yet still odd IMO.
I think it's because of how personal Star Trek feels to all of us. So, arguing about different points of continuity isn't just a debate, but a personal attack.
Irrational, but very human.
I agree. And it's so frustrating, but also a blind spot for me since the Treks I usually like are not always the most popular to discuss. And, for me anyway, I have to step back and remind myself that we all got here because of a passion and interest in Star Trek. So if we try to remember that human element and not assume the worst of our fellow fans then maybe it would go better. Also, hopefully less black and white thinking.true. it’s just the real or implied “whatever…idiot” responses that kinda throw me. Like who cares if someone listens to Kurtzman and co. when they say “prime timeline” or if someone yells from the top of their lungs “ITS ALL WRONG”.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.