I think it was the version I saw was with the dog.Aliens is easiest to spot by the inclusion of the Ripley's daughter scene in the Special Edition. Alien 3, the Alien comes out of a dog in theatrical and an ox in the Assembly.
I think it was the version I saw was with the dog.Aliens is easiest to spot by the inclusion of the Ripley's daughter scene in the Special Edition. Alien 3, the Alien comes out of a dog in theatrical and an ox in the Assembly.
Except for the size of it when it's born. The dog-burster looks nearly as big as the dog as it came out of. Presumably a result of them not shelling out for a new puppet when the host was changed in re-shoots.a dog makes way more sense than an ox
Which all helps set up my stance, that a crossover or easter egg doesn't mean that two universes are actually set in the same one.
Personally, I've never enjoyed the idea of cramming Alien and Blade Runner into the same timeline, and thankfully Ridley and co. has yet to make it proper-official, beyond some vague imagery or small text on a DVD supplement.
Are there supposed to be other aliens in the Alien universe (not counting the Yautja/Predators) besides the Xenomorphs and Engineers? I had on Aliens when it was on FX today, and I never caught the conversation about the Arcturians before, but it sounded like they aren't human, and then the references to it being a "bug hunt" seemed to imply that they've gone on other missions where they were hunting down alien creatures like the Xenomorphs.
Could be, but the Arcturian thing sounds a lot more alien, with the way they talk about one being male.It's been awhile, but I remember it being derogatory, bug hunts being like a wild goose chase.
The internet is buzzing for about 10 days now when a fake poster for a Prey sequel went online. The tag said it would be said in WW2, but the poster obviously shows threnches of WW1.
Now, it's all fake and all, but it got me thinking....
Prey was a succes for the studios, well before the strikes hit. It even got a bluray release, quite a thing for a movie that was supposed to be streaming only. Yet we haven't heard anything more since about a possible sequel. You'd think that with the current climate of Hollywood draining any potential franchise dry, they'd be on that straight away, right?
The writers were on strike until a few weeks ago and the actors still are on strike. I don't think you'll hear much news about new projects like this until Hollywood manages to get the house in order again.
Again, the succes was proven way BEFORE the strikes.Most sequels these days are green lit before you can blink.
And there was a lot of discussion about the sequel before the strike, too. But there's also a reason Prey wound up as a streaming only movie in the first place. The franchise hasn't been in the strongest position lately. So I definitely think they would not want any fully official announcements until they've got a lot more than just 'we're making a sequel' to go on, which will require giving the writers time to work and possibly also ensuring that Amber Midthunder will definitely be available, which she can't negotiate during a strike, etc.
Whatever they do, it better be Prey of Tsushima.
That is a fair point ofcourse.
It's interesting that any sequel would involve Amber Midthunder. That would mean a direct sequel to Prey itself, while the franchise (except for AvP and AvPR) never involved direct sequels. Unless you only AvP and AvPR as sequels of events, since they don't share any characters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.