• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

50th Anniversary Rewatch Thread

The three Arena episodes but what about any of the other shows with the crew fighting and being observed while the season two battle music goes wild about our ears? ;)
JB
 
Star Trek
"The Savage Curtain"
Originally aired March 7, 1969
Stardate 5906.4
H&I said:
Kirk and Spock meet Abraham Lincoln and Surak of Vulcan and must do battle with some of history's most terrible villains.

What was going on the week the episode aired.

Our final three episodes happen to fall in production order, for what it's worth.

I want to like this one for its bits of world building, like Surak and Kahless, but the premise of bringing together great historical figures seems wasted when they're rumbling with sticks and stones. Which ancient leader can wrassle better says nothing about good vs. evil...and it's a bit simplistic to so neatly divide the figures between the two values. Still, you gotta love Abe Lincoln vs. Kahless and Genghis Khan. Not that Kahless was very impressive here. I have to wonder if his gift for mimicry is an official part of Klingon lore.

Anyone else notice that slo-mo Lincoln reaction when Surak first cries out? That always stuck out at me.

Uhura's comments about stripping words of their power to offend remains a pertinent message today .
Indeed. People are more sensitive about words today than they ever have been.

Next week, the show's last new Friday night episode, after which we go on mini-hiatus until June:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I believe the real Lincoln was a great deal more racist than shown in that episode. His reason for ending slavery wasn't out of concern for the African-Americans that he despised almost as much as the southern slave owners did.

Going by Carl Sandburg's biography, he was very much for abolition, which after all is what started the war, the South's reaction to the election of an abolitionist... but he didn't see them as equals either. He was against intermarrying. His solution for slavery was to send them all overseas someplace. Sure, now, there's ample evidence of equality, but it was harder to tell when most were restricted from learning.
------------------
There was a meeting between him and freed black Union soldiers, where they overflowed with gratitude, and it really overwhelmed him, bringing tears to his eyes, Sandberg says.
 
In season one SPOILERS
The neighbour turns out to be a former mobster and tortures a soldier to find out why his sick wife was forcibly relocated to a military hospital. They argue about whether they should kill him but the 'hero' releases him. He later comes back and shoots not his torturer but the man's daughter, who was actually kind to him, thus proving he was a wrong un so torturing him was obviously justified with hindsight.

They then unleash a horde of zombies on the hospital so they can sneak in and release their family members while all the other patients end up dead and not a single character frets about the mass murders they've committed.
C'mon.
 
Okay...

HOW TO SPOILER CODE

  1. Write your $poilerific text
  2. Highlight the portion you want to hide
  3. Click the + icon in the toolbar at the top of the message window
  4. From the pulldown select Spoiler
  5. You will be prompted for the text to describe what you are spoiling
  6. Post your post
This wraps the text in SPOILER tags and hides the text until clicked on.
 
Going by Carl Sandburg's biography, he was very much for abolition, which after all is what started the war, the South's reaction to the election of an abolitionist... but he didn't see them as equals either. He was against intermarrying. His solution for slavery was to send them all overseas someplace. Sure, now, there's ample evidence of equality, but it was harder to tell when most were restricted from learning.

Lincoln was not an abolitionist as it would be understood in 1860, that is the position that slavery be eradicated in all US territory and the formerly enslaved be made equal in every way to any other citizen. This was too radical for most Americans, North or South, at the time. Certainly too radical for a presidential candidate. Lincoln believed that slavery had been built in to the Constitution and a president could not change that. He and his party were firm, though, in their position that slavery not be extended into any new territory. That was enough for the secessionists.

Lincoln's advocacy of colonization was a sort of middle-ground position, which he later admitted had practical problems. But there was strong and even violent opposition to the idea of free blacks in many northern states, and candidates proposing even incremental and gradual abolition of slavery had to have some idea of what to do with the formerly enslaved people. Full integration and equality was just a non-starter at that time, as awful as it sounds today.

There was a meeting between him and freed black Union soldiers, where they overflowed with gratitude, and it really overwhelmed him, bringing tears to his eyes, Sandberg says.

Yes, the war seems to have really changed Lincoln's opinions on race. The more he learned of African-American bravery and sacrifice in the war, the harder he found it to justify any notions of unequal treatment. Though his ideas on race seem quite unenlightened today, they were fairly progressive in his day. Maintaining a coalition to win the war was everything to him, and he was not always able to express publicly what he personally believed. It is clear, though, that he did not "despise" African-Americans. If we want an example of a president that did, we need look no further than Lincoln's successor Andrew Johnson. The contrast between him and Lincoln could not be more clear.
 
Star Trek
"The Savage Curtain"
Originally aired March 7, 1969
Stardate 5906.4


What was going on the week the episode aired.

Our final three episodes happen to fall in production order, for what it's worth.

I want to like this one for its bits of world building, like Surak and Kahless, but the premise of bringing together great historical figures seems wasted when they're rumbling with sticks and stones. Which ancient leader can wrassle better says nothing about good vs. evil...and it's a bit simplistic to so neatly divide the figures between the two values. Still, you gotta love Abe Lincoln vs. Kahless and Genghis Khan. Not that Kahless was very impressive here. I have to wonder if his gift for mimicry is an official part of Klingon lore.

Anyone else notice that slo-mo Lincoln reaction when Surak first cries out? That always stuck out at me.


Indeed. People are more sensitive about words today than they ever have been.

Next week, the show's last new Friday night episode, after which we go on mini-hiatus until June:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I guess you could argue that just as the Lincoln wasn't the real one but the one pictured in Kirk's mind, the Kahless wasn't the true one either but one also coming from the same source. So it's not surprising that he'd be less than flattering. Kahless talent for impersonation could be a common trait attributed by the humans of that time to all Klingons.
 
Like "The Omega Glory," the title "The Savage Curtain" doesn't make a whole lot of sense in terms of what's actually happening. It suggests something like "Theatrical Play about Savagery," or maybe on the other hand "The Savagely Staged Play," which isn't the same thing at all. The Excalbians aren't testing civilization vs savagery anyway, it's good vs evil, dude. :sigh: If it were to have meant "The Savagery That Occurs Behind the Curtain," then I presume we'd've had a totally different story.
"Curtain" in the title comes from Roddenberry's original concept and refers to the theater. Here's what he said in his pitch outline (May 9, 1968):

"More than simply amusement, this alien form of theatre is the way in which the inhabitants of this planet get their knowledge, study other forms of life, educate their young, and decide what is usable and what is false in 'alien' philosophies such as represented by the group of 'actors' now on stage. The enormously advanced technology of this planet is a direct result of the increased wisdom of this strange form of theatre gives. What better faster way is there to learn? (Note -- one can actually make a good case that theatre could be the most efficient form of education cultural intercourse possible.)"

Btw, "Yarnek" was "the Playwright" in the initial pitch.

There's a line in the Blish adaptation where Uhura says she finds her color more attractive than Kirk's or Lincoln's. Was that in the script?
Yes.
 
I guess you could argue that just as the Lincoln wasn't the real one but the one pictured in Kirk's mind, the Kahless wasn't the true one either but one also coming from the same source.

Slight flaw in the logic there is that if Kirk knew about Kahless the Impressionist, he wouldn't have so easily fallen for the ruse. ;)

This one's an episode of two halves, the first half with the mystery of Floating Space Abe and the Instantly Terraforming Planet starts of somewhat promising, it's not boring, it's got some nice bits of discussion on encountering new life forms and the logic of beaming down in an unknown and possibly trap like conditions, and then in the second half when the mystery is revealed and it turns into a stick throwing fight because some omnipotent rocks want a WWE fight to understand good and evil it falls completely apart.

It's nice how Kirk, Uhura and Lincoln talk about racism as being a thing of the past, but it would have been even nicer if then in the group of baddies the two not-white guys and a woman didn't just automatically follow the One White Guy as their default leader, but I guess a challenge for leadership is not something we could have expected from Kahless the Utterly Forgettable... :p

Apparently Mark Lenard was supposed to play Lincoln originally but couldn't due to scheduling conflicts.
It would have been even more confusing if he was to play Surak... :D
 
Slight flaw in the logic there is that if Kirk knew about Kahless the Impressionist, he wouldn't have so easily fallen for the ruse. ;)

This one's an episode of two halves, the first half with the mystery of Floating Space Abe and the Instantly Terraforming Planet starts of somewhat promising, it's not boring, it's got some nice bits of discussion on encountering new life forms and the logic of beaming down in an unknown and possibly trap like conditions, and then in the second half when the mystery is revealed and it turns into a stick throwing fight because some omnipotent rocks want a WWE fight to understand good and evil it falls completely apart.

It's nice how Kirk, Uhura and Lincoln talk about racism as being a thing of the past, but it would have been even nicer if then in the group of baddies the two not-white guys and a woman didn't just automatically follow the One White Guy as their default leader, but I guess a challenge for leadership is not something we could have expected from Kahless the Utterly Forgettable... :p

Apparently Mark Lenard was supposed to play Lincoln originally but couldn't due to scheduling conflicts.
It would have been even more confusing if he was to play Surak... :D
On a rewatch, I was surprised at how much of the episode takes place with Lincoln on the ship. That part of the episode is quite TNGesque.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top