• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers 31st/32nd Century Ships Revealed

Didn't they already fix this for the last couple of S2 episodes, only to revert back to five windows for S3?

The first fix probably involved Saru ordering the plating over of the outer windows, but Detmer crashed the ship into too many rocks on the way down to The Colony and, ah, the cover was blown.

The second fix just makes use of 32nd century TARDIS tech.

Timo Saloniemi
 
So far there’s no indication that 32nd century Starfleet uses Tardis tech. That was only shown in ENT.
 
So far there’s no indication that 32nd century Starfleet uses Tardis tech. That was only shown in ENT.

As i already said, i believe Book's ship is bigger on the inside than it appears on the outside. Especially if we look at the size of the interior seen in "That Hope Is You, Part 1" :whistle:
 
As i already said, i believe Book's ship is bigger on the inside than it appears on the outside. Especially if we look at the size of the interior seen in "That Hope Is You, Part 1" :whistle:

To be fair, that doesn't necessarily mean they're using TARDIS technology. It's very common for fictitious spaceships. The Millennium Falcon, for example. Hell, even though it's scaled up to a ridiculous size, it's still not possible to fit the Abramsverse Enterprise interiors into the ship we see...
 
Jolan tru!

Anyone seen Terra Firma 1? According to Memory Alpha, we learn the name of a new Starfleet ship. Do we get to see any new ships?
 
Using the long form of a name (or of a pen name) is something of a novelty here. Trek previously has not seen the need to distinguish between, say, the Louis and the Neil in naming the Armstrong, and that's a fairly generic surname for the primary audiences.

There's also the KSF Khi'eth, an apparently Kelpian vessel, and one we may very well get to see next week.

Timo Saloniemi
 
We got a registry number for the Khi'eth, too, but they didn't add one of the usual two-to-four-letter registry prefixes.
As for "KSF": Kaminar/Kelpien Space...? Neither "Frigate" nor "Ferry" seem proper to this.
 
..."Force"? That is, the prefix would refer to the organization and drop the redundant referencing of the ship herself.

Timo Saloniemi
 
We got a registry number for the Khi'eth, too, but they didn't add one of the usual two-to-four-letter registry prefixes.
As for "KSF": Kaminar/Kelpien Space...? Neither "Frigate" nor "Ferry" seem proper to this.
I hate when Trek does this. Why would alien registrys use English. Obviously the translator would change the letters and numbers to English but KSF is just too clean
 
I hate when Trek does this. Why would alien registrys use English. Obviously the translator would change the letters and numbers to English but KSF is just too clean

Why would the old Imperial Japanese Navy use "IJN" as their ship Prefix?

They obviously have their own Japanese Naming convention and Prefixes that are different.

But for the sake of conversing with those in their common language like English, IJN is the English equivalent.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Kelpians had their own Kelpian naming scheme and terms in their language and a English equivalent since they are part of the UFP.
 
We got a registry number for the Khi'eth, too, but they didn't add one of the usual two-to-four-letter registry prefixes.
As for "KSF": Kaminar/Kelpien Space...? Neither "Frigate" nor "Ferry" seem proper to this.
Fleet?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top